Stars

Last night, as I sat on the deck looking upward, I counted a billion stars. I may have missed one or two, but I think that’s forgivable, considering the scope of the sky. Cool, clear nights are the best ones for star-gazing. They allow one to look upward and count in broad, sweeping strokes, a hundred million stars at a time. The blackness of space and the tiny pinpoints of dim, flickering light cannot be adequately reproduced by artists because the light in the night sky, and the sky itself, is too vague for the canvas.  The colors and texture one sees in the night sky are too imprecise to be matched by paints or pigments. And the human eye simply does not have the acuity to adequately capture the sky. We must rely on cameras and telescopes and other artificial means of enhancing what we see if we want a more precise image of our skyward glances. But when we do that, we change what we see into something different, though admittedly spectacular. So, in my view, the best way to understand the awe the night sky generates in us is to simply stare at the sky through our own inadequate eyes.

This morning, I took my cup of coffee out on the deck again and looked skyward. It’s still pitch black at five the morning, but I believe I saw even more stars, perhaps a hundred billion of them. The dim lights in the sky seemed just a bit more distinct, a tad brighter and more hopeful this morning. It’s considerably cooler this morning than it was last night; maybe that’s why the stars seems so much brighter. Or, perhaps, it’s because I had all night to consider the faint image last night’s viewing left in my brain and, when I looked up this morning, that slightly blurred image came into sharper focus.

Posted in Nature | Leave a comment

Another Day to Remember

Just like every year on this day, my mother’s birthday, I pause to reflect about her. She was a good woman, a good mother, and a good teacher. I owe my love of language and food to her. And, of course, I owe so much more to her; my existence, for one thing. Like last year, I give her the gift of this photo of yellow roses in her memory. I recently commented on a friend’s blog that I wish I’d taken more photos over the years. I have only a very few photos of my mother, but I remember her face without having photos to remind me.

Posted in Family | Leave a comment

Man of Many Faces

I’m playing with a smart phone app, Prisma. Here are various treatments of the same photo that I manipulated earlier (using MS Paint) to wash the background with a “psychedelic” memory; subsequent to the MS Paint manipulation, I used Prisma to radically alter the new image.The treatments say different things to me, as I’ve tried to explain with the captions.

Face of stone.

Face of stone.

There is a crack in everything.

There is a crack in everything.

Melting like butter.

Melting like butter.

Emerging from a deep pool.

Emerging from a deep pool.

I am chiseled steel.

I am chiseled steel.

mf6

Staring up from the bottom of the pool.

mf7

Awash in chalk and tempera.

mf8

A child of the corn.

mf9

Bold, brash, and bizarre.

mf10

When I was Jimi Hendrix.

mf11

A fine lead pencil portrays the breakable me.

mf12

Aging into pink lunacy.

mf13

If I were wet paper and your eyes were the sun.

mf14

The dark side of losing face.

mf15

Imagine a face without features; it’s easy if you try.

mf18

Just a fuzzy memory.

Posted in Art, Creativity | Leave a comment

All the Secrets

I was up by four again this morning. There’s something about four in the morning, isn’t there? Something about that hour calls me out of bed and tells me to reveal what’s on my mind. And I do. This morning, I made my coffee and added to the “drafts” I could, if I so chose, post on this blog one day. The number of available drafts now stands at sixty-six. And the number I’ve actually posted is 2,032. Closing in on 2,100 on this blog alone. But that number doesn’t include the things I’ve written and saved only on my computer; I haven’t counted those pieces I have opted not to store, even in draft form in an ostensibly inaccessible place, on the internet. Because we all know internet sites can be hacked. Private information can be made public. And there are just some secrets that should remain secret. Actually, all the secrets one holds close should remain secret. That word, “secret,” is so laden with undeserved intrigue. Sometimes, secrets are simply pieces of oneself one wishes to keep private.

Before I began writing this post, I scanned through a photo subdirectory on my computer. I looked at photos of people and places and objects that at one time sufficiently captured my attention to warrant recording those images. Most of those images still hold enough interest to justify keeping them; I may one day delete some of those image files, but for now, I want to keep them so I can see them again. I suppose it’s the same with some, perhaps most, of my writing. Whether I classify them as drafts or finished pieces, I want to keep them where I can read them or otherwise use them in the future.

Most of my draft blog posts will never be made public simply because they disclose thoughts I wanted to record only for myself, not for others who stumble upon my blog. But, then, that’s true even of the public posts. Yet most of the ones that reside behind the privacy curtain were never meant to be, and never will be, made public. I suppose I’m just used to using the convenient interface the blog provides for me. So, the question arises: why not just use Word for all drafts and, when they are suitable, simply copy and paste them to the blog for posting? I don’t know. This morning, before I began writing this post, I wrote two drafts on the blog and one longer piece in Word. One of the drafts here will most certainly not make it to the public part of the blog; the other might. But the piece I wrote in Word may or may not. I don’t know why I chose to hold that longer piece here. The pieces I wrote using the blog interface probably will migrate away from the blog and find their way onto my computer’s hard drive.

Last night, we had dinner with friends who had two out-of-town visitors. One of the visitors, a psychology professor, asked what I was doing in retirement. I told her I was involved in a number of things, but that the most captivating activity is my writing. I have been thinking of my response ever since. Is writing the most captivating thing I’m doing? If it is, why am I doing it in such a disjointed fashion? What’s keeping me from finishing pieces, from even wanting to finish pieces I start? I haven’t answered my questions entirely, but I think the most important reasons have to do with all the secrets that writing has the potential to reveal. All the secrets. Secrets one may not know even about oneself.

Posted in Writing | Leave a comment

Butterflies

Included among the visitors to our hummingbird feeders of late have been various wasps, ants, and of course hummingbirds. But, just recently, some quite beautiful butterflies have become frequent visitors. I see these butterflies all around the Village, but only recently have they designated our hummingbird feeders as butterfly food-service stations. Today, as I was examining one such visitor from a distance of just a few feet, I noticed the striking black/blue body and iridescent blue markings on the back of its wings. But I also noticed orange spots near the front and all along the underside of its wings. My knowledge of butterflies is on par with my knowledge of quantum mechanics, so I had no idea what I was looking at (beyond the obvious—a butterfly). On the chance that I might identify it simply by describing its most obvious (to me) characteristics, I implored Father Google to help me. Father Google obliged. The butterflies that so intrigue me are, if I correctly interpret my research findings, Red-spotted Purple butterflies. These creatures like forested areas and their range includes Arkansas. Much to my chagrin, I haven’t been able to take any pictures of the creatures.  But the photo below, which I’ve linked from the University of Wisconsin bioweb website (click on image to go to the site) is what I’ve been seeing around the Village and on my hummingbird feeders.

Photo linked from University of Wisconsin bioweb page/

Photo linked from University of Wisconsin bioweb page/

Posted in Nature | Leave a comment

Her Father’s Demons

“They’re stunted little men who live in those hills,” he said, pointing to the houses across the street. “They’re tiny, like elves, but these bastards have sharp teeth. And their claws! Goddamn, they’re monstrous beasts!”

Calista Glazier winced as she listened to her father describe the little men he claimed he saw outside the window a few hours earlier when she was still asleep on the couch in the living room.

“Are you sure it wasn’t a dream, Daddy? I’ve never seen anything like that.”

Steadfast Glazier glared at his daughter. “Hell no, it wasn’t a dream! I don’t sleep no more. Stay awake sunrise to sunrise so’s no time to dream. And t’weren’t the first time I seen ’em. They come out around two in the morning. I see ’em under the street light when they come outta their caves, swarming like bats, there’s so many of ’em.”

Calista couldn’t believe what she was hearing come from her father’s lips.

“How can you tell they have sharp teeth and claws, Daddy? Seems like it would be pretty dim, even with the street light.”

“I know what I see! And, besides, a couple nights ago I seen what they did to some stray cats and dogs. Sliced ’em and diced ’em with their claws and bit through ’em with those teeth like they’re bitin’ though butter. And then they licked up the spilt blood like they was lappin’ up milk.”

As Calista listened to her father talk, she knew something dreadful was wrong. His grammar, his pronunciation, even the pitch of his voice did not belong to the father she knew. Steadfast Glazier was an educated man. He had been a senior executive with a major national insurance company. He did not speak like an uneducated hillbilly, nor would he conjure demonic dwarfs who ate neighborhood pets.

The day before, Calista Glazier drove from Denison, Texas to her father’s home in Struggles, Arkansas, at the behest of her sister, Sugar Sharkle. Sugar was closer in distance to their father, but she always turned to her older sister in matters too troublesome to face on her own, and this was one such matter. Calista arrived in time to prepare dinner for the two of them. Pork chops, creamed corn from a can, and spinach from the freezer.

Calista noticed nothing unusual about her father’s behavior that evening. The conversation was casual and unhurried.

“So, honey, tell me how the candle business is doing.”

“It’s humming along, Daddy, and growing fast, but not too fast. I think shutting down the brick and mortar store was the best decision I’ve made since I started the business. Sales for the online store are triple what I was doing at the shop and I don’t have to worry about paying attention to people who are just window shopping. Scented candles and soaps sell best. I spend every other day making the soap and candles. When I’m not making them, I’m shipping orders. And I take Saturday’s off. And when I feel overwhelmed, I just take a day off, a day trip like this one to see you.”

“That’s good. You need to give yourself time to relax. How many hours a day do you spent working?”

Calista cocked her head smiled at her father. “Don’t worry, Daddy, I’m not overdoing it. I hardly ever work more than eight or ten hours.”

“I have to worry. You got your work ethic from your mother and me. And we spent too damn much time working and not enough with you and Sugar.”

“Oh, Daddy, you spent plenty of time with us. We turned out just fine, didn’t we?”

“Well, you turned out fine. But Sugar married Leroy.” His face hardened as he mentioned Leroy’s name.

Calista’s smile morphed into an expression of concern.

“Aw, Daddy, Leroy’s not a bad guy. He’s just not as sharp as you are. You wanted Sugar to marry a doctor or a lawyer.”

“A doctor, maybe. But not a  lawyer! I have my principles!” Steadfast’s smile returned.

And so the evening went. During three hours of conversation, Calista neither saw nor heard anything of concern in her father’s behavior. She wondered whether her sister had exaggerated about their father’s “trips to the loony bin,” as Sugar called them.

When Calista witnessed her father’s bizarre behavior the next morning, though, she knew Sugar had reason to be concerned.

“Daddy, when did you start seeing these men?”

Steadfast Glazier’s gaze dropped to the floor, then back to Calista. “What? What men?”

“You were just saying…” Calista stopped as she noticed the blazing coals of anger in his eyes had turned soft and quizzical, the anger in his face melted into confusion.

“Oh, never mind, Daddy. Are you ready for breakfast?”

“Just coffee for me, honey.  But the fridge is stocked for a breakfast banquet. I have bacon, eggs, frozen hash browns, sausage…”

Steadfast Glazier’s daughter interrupted. “No, I’m good with just coffee, too.”

Calista knew she had to do something, but she didn’t know what.

[Yes, there should be more. I know that. Of course I know that. What, do you think I’m stupid? I just get bored with this. I want to do a pancreas transplant on an unsuspecting presidential candidate, instead. Or, maybe, I could perform cataract surgery on myself in front of a steamy mirror.]

Posted in Fiction, Writing | 5 Comments

The Cleansing

Certain words convey meanings that dictionary definitions do not adequately express. One such word , in my humble opinion, is “boisterous.”

A group of pre-school children might be called boisterous. But the word is inappropriate to describe a gang of violent narco-traffickers in the throes of cleansing a neighborhood of members of an opposing cartel. But why? Both groups are “rough and noisy;” both groups are “clamorous.” Both are “unrestrained.” What is it about “boisterous” that describes one but not the other?

Now, let’s apply another word to the same two groups: “violent.” I do not object to applying the term to our narco-traffickers. These guys can, indeed, be said to be “acting with or characterized by uncontrolled, strong, rough force.” Well, the same can be said about the children, right? So, why is “violent” an apt word to describe the apes with the guns but not the apes on the jungle gyms?

Here’s my assessment. Some adjectives imply behavioral motives. “Imply” may not be the best word here; perhaps “carry” is a better term. Or maybe not. Regardless, I think some adjectives are thicker and heavier than the letters that comprise them. We learn to weigh them and take their measure without realizing the lesson we are learning. Another term for such an outcome is “brain-washing,” the generally accepted definition of which is: “a method for systematically changing attitudes or altering beliefs, originated in totalitarian countries, especially through the use of torture, drugs, or psychological-stress techniques.”

Perhaps by now you’ve begun to see where I’m going with this. If not, let me lay it out. Language can be used, whether subtly or forthrightly, as a tool to manipulate attitudes and beliefs. In this ugly political season, I think our future hinges on our collective ability to recognize and counter such manipulation. Incidentally, one antonym of “subtle” is “stupid.”

Posted in Language, Philosophy, Politics | Leave a comment

She Didn’t Even Know

She didn’t even know she kissed him. She didn’t realize her smiles—and the way she shrugged and laughed—were kisses just as surely as if their mouths met. Each breath she took, every turn of her head to look in his direction, each protracted slow-motion glance was a disclosure of desire. His. And when she squeezed his shoulder, he almost kissed her. But he knew better. Maybe she wasn’t sending the signals he received. But, if she was…? Would his failure to respond be a mistake? Would she interpret it as a rejection?

She was only thirty-one.  But she was worldly. She had seen and done things he hadn’t dreamed of. After he heard her stories, though, he wanted to see and do those things with her. The problem, though, was that she was oblivious to his teenage crush; a crush that had grown far beyond the desires of youth, blossoming into the wanton lust of adulthood. He was twenty-seven. Who knows? They had questions. They had desires hidden behind those emotional walls.

Those two…are pliable. If the wind blows just a little stronger, it might shape them the way a sculptor molds wet clay. We can only watch and hold our breath, wondering what will happen next.

I’m sorry, we haven’t even been properly introduced, yet I’m running on about the potential of their relationship as if you and I knew one another well. I’m Belenus, god of the sun and patron of the city of Aquileia. And you are…? Of, of course! Brigid! I should have known! I see poetry in your face and the fire of the forge in your eyes! I feel a little silly talking about sculpting their relationship out of clay, knowing your background in the arts.  But, now, since we’re talking, what do you think about them? What is their future? What is their past? What, really, is their story?

If you must know, Brigid did not answer. She simply smiled and glanced in their direction. The look on her face told the story a thousand times.

Posted in Writing | 1 Comment

Three Perspectives

Have you ever been stood up for a date that wasn’t yet scheduled? A suggestion of “let’s plan to get together,” followed by protracted silence? Yeah, if you look carefully at the precursor conversations and conduct an honest assessment of the situation, you’ll find that you’ve been had. Played like a cheap violin. Your emotions, molded as easily as clay, conformed to someone else’s desired shapes, where they began to harden. And, now, they are brittle, as breakable as fragile thin glass.

Have you ever said to someone, “let’s plan to get together,” without really meaning it? It was easier than telling the truth, that the person to whom you’re speaking either bores or annoys you or…simply doesn’t interest you. Well, your mistake was in setting unrealistic expectations; giving the impression that a relationship might be in the offing. You inadvertently took the person’s emotions into your hands and, through your silence, appear ready to dash them against the rocks.

Have you ever witnessed a misunderstanding between two people evolve before your eyes? One of the two has an obvious interest in the other; the interest isn’t reciprocal, but the object of interest is kind in a noncommittal sort of way. You watched expectations of the one blossom as the other concluded the casual brush-off succeeded. As a witness, you didn’t expect to be called upon as arbiter of truth and emotional validation, but that’s what will happen. You were drawn in to an emotional battle which both sides lost; and the war correspondent was taken prisoner.

Posted in Writing | Leave a comment

My Sovereign Sky

When I am alone with the sky, when I look up toward the stars  or the clouds and abandon awareness of earth and its inhabitants, the firmament is mine. Or perhaps I am its sole subject, beholden only to its sovereignty. We have a symbiotic relationship, the sky and I. We feed each other’s sense of wonder at the fragility and supremacy of the other, marveling at how such magnificence can exist so close to the edge of irrelevance and obscurity.

For each thought, there is an opposite—an absence of that thought. Together, the thought and its absence are invisible, unthinkable, empty. Without the absence of thought, there can be no opposite, so no thought to counter its absence. You cannot see that emptiness, nor can you even think of it, because it is not there. Surely you can understand that, can’t you? Or is that understanding a private one, a logic shared only between my sovereign sky and me?

For every inflation, there is an equal and opposite deflation, for every truth, there is an equal and opposite lie, for every tree taking space in the air, there is space in the air searching for the absence of a tree. My logic is irrefutable, though possibly inscrutable, except in my eyes and in the absence of eyes of my sovereign sky. Because the sky has no eyes. Yet the sky and I play with one another the way puppies run in their sleep, chasing dreams invisible to you and me but vivid to the puppies.

You and I may share the same sky, but I cannot share my sovereign sky with anyone because it’s not mine to share. My sovereign sky is as real as my imagination, but as imaginary as your sky is to me. I cannot see through your eyes and you cannot see through mine, except to the extent that I permit, through my words, and you permit through yours. But what if our words meant different things to one another? What if the word “goat” conjures in your eyes an image of an animal that, to me, corresponds to an image of  the word “dog,” that in my mind’s eye conjures an image of what the word “kangaroo” means to you? That’s why I cannot share my sovereign sky with you. And it’s not mine to share.

There’s a memory in your head, a memory of looking at clouds in the sky and imagining what those clouds were. You saw dogs, cats, an old man’s face, a car transforming into a bicycle. I saw the same sky, but I didn’t see your dogs, cats, old men, cars, and bicycles. My sovereign sky held its own menagerie. It still does.

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

Affront

“It was as if I saw it happen in slow m-m-m-motion.” Recuerda Villa, her eyes wide, recalled what she had witnessed.

What she had seen, though Recuerda wasn’t close enough to see it quite so clearly, was this. Jolene’s right arm, hanging motionless at her side, rose up and forward, then left across her chest and slightly back toward her body. Her right hand stopped just short of her left ear, then her arm sprung like a coiled snake, the back of her fist smashing into Lavender’s left cheek with an audible “crack!” Lavender’s eyes snapped shut and her head jerked back with the force of impact. She stumbled backward four steps until the back of her knees hit the low table next to the deck railing. Her knees buckled, and the force of movement thrust her downward until her back was parallel with the deck. Momentum thrust her across  and over the railing. She tumbled upside down toward the ground below.

Recuerda Villa, sunbathing on her dock a few houses away, saw the event, she told police. “It looked like the women were fighting, but I’m not sure. Women don’t fight here, not in Hot Springs Village.”

Maybe not. But, as the police would uncover during the investigation, the brief interchange between Jolene Shaw and Lavender Boudreaux certainly had all the trappings of a fight. A fight to the death. Lavender’s death.

Several people were much closer to the scene. Among them were ten women just inside inside Jolene’s house. A couple of them reported they thought they heard a scream, but didn’t think much of it. After all, one of them said, “It’s not unusual to hear someone in a gaggle of tipsy knitters shriek with laughter at a tawdry joke.”

 

[No idea where this is going. I’m not much of a mystery writer, but this vignette seems to “have all the trappings” of a mystery. At least some of the trappings.]

Posted in Fiction, Writing | Leave a comment

Discretion

Knob Creek Rye Whiskey. That’s the choice I made when deciding which of the six whiskies I should buy from those I’d tasted  yesterday afternoon at Colonial Liquors in Little Rock. I could have chosen any of the other four I liked, but selected Knob Creek Rye almost at random. The only tasted whiskey with which I was unimpressed was Knob Creek Smoked Maple Whiskey; while some whiskey afficionados might be impressed by its overwhelming maple aroma and sweet maple flavor, I wasn’t. Then, I’m no whiskey afficionado; I just like certain whiskies. If truth be told, I probably like most whiskies.

I would have been perfectly happy to go home with a bottle of the Basil Hayden’s I tasted, or a bottle of Maker’s 46, or a bottle of Maker’s Mark Cask Strength, or a bottle of Booker’s. But the more appealing price of the Knob Creek Rye and the slightly peppery finish won me over; at $30 (with a $10 discount), it wasn’t cheap, but it wasn’t a $50 bottle, either. I learned something about whiskey yesterday that I did not know before. It actually tastes better (to me, anyway) with a bit of ice in it. I had always thought melting ice would dilute the flavor and, in fact, I guess it does. But, as one of the young women offering the samples explained, a little ice “opens up” the flavor of the whiskey and makes it “brighter.” I tried one of the whiskies without ice and another sample with it; the one with ice did, indeed, “open up” and tasted “brighter.”

What does one do after tasting six whiskies and two beers (the names of neither of which stuck with me)? Well, one goes outside, crosses a few feet of asphalt, and buys some tacos from the Taqueria Jalisco San Juan taco truck stationed permanently in the parking lot, of course. Two tacos de lengua and one taco al pastor later (which we ate at a little table under a canopy next to the truck), I was ready to head home with my friend, who had only two tacos. I will admit that I probably like the food just a little more than I otherwise would simply because it’s made in and served from a taco truck; something about taco trucks appeals to me. But, bias aside, I really enjoy their tacos. They are not the best I’ve ever had, by any means, but they satisfy my taco cravings and that’s what counts. The downside to some taco trucks, and that includes this one, is that some taco trucks do not make available multiple squeeze bottles of various types of salsa. I prefer the fiery (as in quite spicy) fire-roasted tomato and tomatillo based salsas like those I used to get at the original Taqueria Paloma in Plano, Texas. While ordering there was sometimes a bit of a challenge because my Spanish is old and rusty and their counter help wasn’t entirely fluent in English, the food was out of this world good. When I ate there, I felt as if I’d been transported to a little stand in Mexico, where the cooks had the right ingredients, the right knowledge, and the right skills to produce taco perfection. Taqueria Jalisco San Juan doesn’t transport me that way, but you do what you gotta do when taco cravings strike, don’t you?

I checked my calendar for today and tomorrow and discovered, quite happily, that there’s nothing there that requires me to adhere to a schedule of any kind. That may change, but at this hour it appears I’m free as a bird. I recognize I should use these free hours and days to do prep work for painting the living room and, then, do the actual painting. And I might. But I also recognize that I have until October 11 to get the job done before new furniture delivery (the date delayed from September 27 at our request). So, maybe I’ll be lazy today and/or tomorrow. Maybe I’ll pretend I’m retired and have nothing tugging at my time.

I am so incredibly fortunate to be able to write what I’ve just written. The whole thing, not just the preceding paragraph. To have discretion is an incredible gift that one should not take lightly.

Posted in Booze, Food | Leave a comment

Physical and Mental

Today, I’m using this blog as a journal. On my agenda this morning is a visit to my doctor for my annual physical, then a visit to Little Rock this afternoon with a friend. The first activity is routine. The physical began with yesterday morning’s trek to the doctor’s office for a blood draw for lab work. The technician stabbed my left arm and withdrew three vials of blood which I assume has, by now, been subjected to testing, measurement, evaluation, and reporting. I will learn the results of those assessments when I visit today, assuming the work has, in fact, been done.

The afternoon visit was prompted by an item my wife noticed in a liquor store brochure, announcing the store’s planned tasting of three very high-end and expensive bourbons. Inasmuch as I tend not to buy very high-end and expensive bourbons, attending this tasting may be one of the only opportunities I’ll have to sample them. So, I asked a friend if he’d like to join me (my wife opted out, in favor of an unrelated wine tasting this evening.). I was not invited to the wine tasting, so I’ll stay home and pout.

It’s just three hours until my annual physical begins. Last year, I asserted to my doctor that I’d be slimmer, lighter, and more muscular when I see him for this year’s physical. I lied. It was an unintentional lie. I had planned on accomplishing the aim of being slimmer, lighter, and more muscular. But results follow action. Different results follow inaction. The inaction, then, can be blamed for my failure to achieve the desired results. See what I just did? I blamed inaction, not myself, for the deficiency. That is a convenient, but deplorable, way to avoid taking responsibility for ones own decisions, lack of discipline, and outright laziness. The first step is solving  problem is admitting to the problem. I’ve taken that step multiple times, so I should have traveled quite the distance by now.

Actually, I am a little slimmer, a little lighter, and arguably a shade more muscular than last year. So the lie isn’t as brazen as I made it out to be in the first paragraph. My modest improvement, though, does not meet the standard I set for myself. I’m working on meeting that standard.

Earlier this week, during my sculpture class, I inquired as to whether anyone knew of a good ceramics kiln for sale. No one did. But I’m exploring, again. I’d like to be able to do both bisque firing and glaze firing right here at my house, instead of driving all the way to the National Park College campus. I’m still not absolutely certain I want to spend the money necessary to have a kiln, because I’m not sure my hobby and my low-level skill warrants such an investment. Wait, I referred to it as an investment. Let me be clear, it’s not an investment; it’s an expense. But it’s worth exploring, nonetheless. Or, at least, I think it is.

Now, let’s see if I can turn this little journal on its head and write a bit more creatively.

When I awoke this morning a few minutes before four, I crept out of the bedroom in silence, doing my best not to disturb my sleeping wife.  Bright light from the full moon through the wall of windows on one side and the artificial light of a street lamp entering the half-moon window above the front entryway on the other bathed the living room. Outside the wall of windows, the deck and chairs and table looked as if a spotlight shone on them. Beyond them, the empty air was black, except for trees in the distance, visible as dim echoes of night. Dozens of bright stars dotted the patch of clear sky I could see when I walked outside. But the moon’s light washed away the light of millions more, stars I sometimes can  see when the moon in is hiding.  The air outside was slightly cool but heavy, as if struggling to shed moisture without the benefit of rain. The noises of cicadas and crickets and frogs were not as pronounced as they are some nights and early mornings, but their sounds most assuredly announced the presence of the creatures in the forest of trees surrounding the house.

Some mornings, and this is one of them, my creative juices want to be let out of their pouches but they’re not strong enough to break through the impermeable fabric that’s holding them. I’ve learned that I must accept their weakness at such times and satisfy myself to drink coffee and expose myself to the world around me through the internet, which is what I will now do.

Posted in Health, Just Thinking, Nature, Noise, Ruminations, Sound | Leave a comment

More Than I Ever Knew

This evening, I watched a news broadcast. Something was said in the broadcast, I don’t remember quite what, that triggered vague memories of a number of news items in days and months and years past. These news items involved people who had “given everything they had” to accomplish specific goals in life. Though the majority of news items involved scientific and medical breakthroughs, some involved sports figures achieving their dreams by accomplishing things no other human had ever done.

When these things cross my mind, I naturally (is it natural?) try to recall instances in which I “gave everything I had” to achieve something vitally important to me. That attempt at memory comes up empty; I don’t recall ever having given “everything I had,” that is, everything I was capable of giving, to accomplish something. Maybe that something I wanted simply fell in my lap before I was challenged to give all; or maybe I came to the conclusion that mine was an impossible objective, beyond my grasp. Whatever the reason, I don’t seem to know of a single circumstance in which I feel that I was willing to give my all to accomplish something.

Should I feel alone in the world for that? Am I, alone, the only one whose mediocrity is fueled by an unwillingness or inability to “give it all” toward a goal? Or am I normal? Are the abnormal ones the people who are so utterly committed to an objective that they will literally go beyond their own capacities in order to reach it?

I wish I had been willing to “give my all” to something. I don’t know what; just something. Something meaningful, impactful, important; something beyond myself, my family, my human race, my planet; something that transcends everything we humans realize is important. Geez, that’s some grandiose thinking. Perhaps I ought to be satisfied to give everything I have for the benefit of something or someone dear to me, rather than to accomplish something. Yes, that’s more like it.

Yet my mind rushes to the words of Shakespeare, words that echo in my brain a lot of late, from Julius Caesar: The evil that men do lives after them; the good is oft interred with their bones.

Superficial. That’s the word that is far too close to descriptive of me. I explore a thousand avenues, but never walk even one in its entirety. I know very little about very much. That may be explainable, but not forgiven. One mustn’t spend 62 years scratching the surface of everything within reach, never delving below for fear of drowning in the ineptitude to “get” what’s a few micrometers below. Lest the reader think I am singling myself out as a unique outcast, seeking a soothing, “there, there,” that’s not the case. I’m not seeking pity and I don’t feel particularly alone in my mediocrity and my unwillingness to struggle to accomplish objectives that perhaps seem impossible. I am unhappy with the state of things, to be sure, but I don’t pity myself for having made an unintentional contribution to the world today by failing to give more of myself to make the world a better place. That’s a long sentence. Yes, I know; it deserves its length, because the subject is of sufficient import to warrant more words and less worry.

Some evenings, and some mornings, I get the impression I am writing frenetically simply because I know I don’t have much time to unload all the thoughts in my brain. A successful unloading process, including some form of sorting and elimination of redundancies, would take a supercomputer a thousand years. I’m raging against the machine (if you get that, good, if not, don’t worry).

This post started in a very different place than the one in which it will finish. So did the writer. My mind scurries through nooks and crannies and rat-holes looking for crumbs of thought that I might snatch and call my own, though I know they belong to someone else, though I know not who. Darkness is beginning to have its way with the earth, so the dim light contributing to my happy mood is disappearing fast.

I know one thing with certainty. One person I wish would read my blog from time to time will not, cannot. That person doesn’t even know it exists. And I can’t call attention to it. Such are the mistakes we make when we think we know whether this dimension starts and ends and another ends and commences. It’s all magic, in one form or another. And the magic is more than I ever knew. Far, far, far more.

Posted in Just Thinking | 1 Comment

That Little Piece of Serenity

That little piece of serenity you think you hide
from view in the privacy of your own brain,
that little kingdom over which you believe
only you hold everlasting dominion,
broadcasts through your eyes, its secret
spilling into the air, like milk from a
bottle overturned on the counter
floods the floor below, revealing the
mess behind those windows to your soul
as sure as the curds on the slippery tile
reveal the mayhem you’ve made in the kitchen.

Posted in Poetry, Writing | Leave a comment

Devian

Four in the morning is the time of day when one is free to think unthinkable thoughts. It is a time of day at which sadness and loathing intersect with fear and rage. Depression and a multitude of other forms of mental anguish spring from the unsavory freedoms of four in the morning. Hatred. Crippling self-doubts. Fear of rejection. So it is not surprising that the seeds of Devian Qualls’ reprehensible plan sprouted just after four in the morning that November day in Devian’s musty house. Devian Qualls—a man cursed with a round, rubbery, paste-white face, thick neck to match thick glasses, and two hundred pounds more than his skeleton was meant to carry—intersected with four in the morning in a most unpleasant way.

Fog turned to icy drizzle and then to sleet shortly after Devian awoke. He traipsed back and forth in front of the French doors from the living room to the kitchen, stopping occasionally to stare out into the blackness of the morning. His thick nostrils flared as the pace of his pounding march from one side of the room to the other quickened with each circuit.

“Damn sleet! I’ve either got to go soon or I’ll be iced in here for god knows how long!”

He was the only one who heard his voice. His wife of nineteen years, Charmaine Qualls, had moved out three weeks earlier and, by the time Devian was cursing the ice gods, she probably was busily planning to change her last name to that of her wealthy suitor.

Devian slowed his pacing, then shuffled to his desk and sat, drinking strong coffee and staring at the empty computer screen. The chair moaned at every movement of his three hundred and thirty pound frame. He placed his sausage fingers on the keyboard and typed a few words:

‘I have done some things that were wrong, but not because I am a bad man’

He deleted the incomplete thought and began anew:

‘My multiple attempts to engage in extramarital affairs must have been prompted by’

He flipped that paragraph away, too, switching the object of his typery to his wife:

‘After trying so many times to have relationships with other women, Charmaine’s infidelity really caught me off guard’

Again, the words disappeared with a click of the mouse button. After several attempts to begin the story of his failed infidelity, and his surprise at learning of his wife’s success at the adulterous endeavor,  he withdrew his plump hands from the keyboard.

What if, he wondered to himself, the objects of his inappropriate carnal desires, each of whom had rejected his overtures, had instead been receptive? What if he had successfully engaged a dozen women in extramarital affairs? And what if he could rub his soon-to-be-ex-wife’s nose in those trysts? The seeds of his appalling plan began to take root.

“All right, then, I can pursue a lot of justice with this,” he said aloud, smiling at the empty empty grey computer screen bathing him in ghostly light.

“I’ll get those bitches. I know they had affairs. I just know they did. I wasn’t born yesterday. Sure they had them. They just didn’t have ’em with me. But I’ll make it look to their husbands like they did. And I’ll make it look to Charmaine like she bailed on somebody every other woman who set eyes on him wanted. That’ll kill her!”

Discomfort and solitude , coupled with simmering rage and a sociopathic lack of morals and empathy morphed into ugly desiderata that day.

[Yeah, yeah, yeah. My foreshadowing here told the entire story. The unfortunate thing is this: it’s implausible, uninteresting, and predictable. Or maybe not. But to my ADHD mind, it’s old news and unworthy of more fingerwork. But I’m posting it anyway, just because I might one day want to come back and borrow from it. I really need to get to know all these people I write about, though. Once we become close, I’m sure their stories will ooze out of me like blood leaking from a loosely wrapped bandage.] 😉

Posted in Fiction, Writing | 2 Comments

A Lock I Must Crack on My Own

I spent two or three hours last night, glued to the television set, watching programs about cooking, eating, and smoking food. It’s rare that I spend that much time in front of the television, but last night I was in the mood to be entertained or, perhaps more precisely, lulled away from the world around me into a sense of detachment and comfort. The latter seems more likely.  Whatever the reason, the fifty-five inch babysitter did an admirable job of substituting for Xanax; I forgot the fact that our world teeters on the edge of a precipice over which, sooner rather than later, the earth is apt to plummet into a conflagration that ultimately will rid the planet of the scourge of humankind.

That impending annihilation of humankind notwithstanding, I found myself mesmerized by: 1) a program in which Sara Moulton taught me that I have always wanted to make and eat pasta with pesto, string beans, and potatoes; 2) another program in which Steven Raichlen successfully triggered my desire to own and use a “personal smoker,” which is a device I do not need and would be embarrassed to own because it is so utterly unnecessary to humanity and so decadent that it’s shocking to even know it exists (but incredibly alluring and sexy in the extreme–making me think I  could be a sought-after smoking stud if I owned one); and 3) a program that made me want to discard my life and history as it has existed heretofore and move to a remote Mexican village, where I would be taught how to grow all my food—including goats, sheep, chickens, fish, leafy and fruit-bearing vegetables of all kinds, herbs, root vegetables, and cactus—that would satisfy my every nutritional and sustenance need, not to mention my need for meaningful work.

It may be as obvious to you as it is to me that those two or three hours of watching television, regardless of the instructional or educational value, were unhealthy and, potentially, dangerous. I easily skipped over reality shows and crime drama swill, but then it occurred to me I had actually been watching reality shows. I bought into the “you can make this, too” message of cooks and chefs. The same message is delivered by Dance with the Stars and American Idol (does it still exist?) and other such swill that I believe, with all my heart, is soul-deadening stuff that erases the knowledge education imparts.

I’m writing this tongue in cheek, but it’s a serious subject. We’re allowing ourselves to be dumbed-down and severely limited in our aspirations by television and Trump and the Republican Party. And the Democratic Party. And politicians in general. Did you see the interview fiasco with Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson? I attribute his gaffe to a simple brain freeze or misconnection that we all have from time to time; but one wishes presidential candidates would not exhibit such fallibility so publicly. Honestly, I wish a hybrid party would form, in which the best fiscal conservative ideas, the most humane progressive ideas, and the most diverse and practical ideas from the various other factions, to bring some sanity and unity back to this country.

Blacks view every action of every police department and every justice agency as racist, with or without evidence or cause. Do you blame them? The whole bloody system has been rigged against them from the beginning and White America seems unwilling to acknowledge and correct the systemic problems that allow racism to continue, hidden (except to its victims) behind a veil of “we fixed the problem in the sixties.” Yeah, and Whites view Blacks’ rage against the system as some form of psychosis or simply sour grapes. What the hell? Can we not put ourselves in their shoes and try to understand that bigotry builds defensive walls inside a person? Can we not forgive what may (or may not) be an “over-reaction” to century after century of oppression that, today, seems destined to continue to be ingrained in society until the end of time? Cripes!

All right. I admit it. I got a little off track. Okay, I drove off the Pacific Coast Highway and made my way into a borough of Manhattan.  So shoot me. No. I didn’t mean that. Erase that thought.

Back to my television viewing habits. I’ve grown unhappy with broadcast television (and I include cable and satellite television in that). And I’m finding less and less I want to view on Netflix, etc. Maybe it’s that I lack the patience to wade through the crap I see, hoping to find some nugget of value and interest. That’s probably it. There’s value there, but it’s hidden under vast piles of ugly, unpleasant, post-digested swill. And I have no patience for sorting through the swill. Hence, my lower-than-average television watching. I spend too damn much time on the computer, though. And not enough time reading books. I would like to read more, but my damn eyes continue to be uncooperative. I’ve thought about books on tape, but I guess I don’t want to admit ocular defeat. I am open to eye transplants from young, eagle-eyed donors; send them my way.

Ach. I write and write and write and never say a damn thing. There are ideas hiding inside me that I ought to expose. But I just can’t seem to release them from their self-imposed prison. That’s not something anyone else can help with; that’s a lock I must crack on my own.

All right, then. I guess it’s time for coffee to calm these frazzled, sleep-deprived nerves. I should go outside and see if the hummingbirds are swarming, demanding to know why their nectar bottles are not yet hanging. Or, perhaps, the raccoons are assembling in angry mobs, ready to pounce on the bastard who absconded with the hummingbird nectar, AKA raccoon joy juice. Maybe I can write children’s books. I’d just need the right children and the right parents who are willing to expose their kids to a very adult version of cynicism. Yeah, that’s it.

It’s early in the morning and I need hugs and kisses to start my day off right. Coffee, alone, is an inadequate substitute for love.

Posted in Television, Writing | Leave a comment

Losing Morfar

Once upon a time, an old Norwegian fisherman took his granddaughter out in his fishing boat. His boat was not the pleasure craft one sees so often today among men who call themselves fisherman. Rather, it was an old workhorse of a boat, a no-nonsense assemblage of nets crusted with salt amid ropes carefully coiled in their proper places on the deck.

Only an hour into the trip, the girl had become impatient with the cruise and began to complain.

“Morfar, let’s go back home. I’m bored. There’s nothing to do here but look at the water.”

The old man, his gentle eyes resting on the girl’s beautiful blonde hair, replied in soft words meant to sooth and calm her growing discontent.

“Datterdatter, the water gives you the life you live. The sea’s bounty is lifeblood for your mother and me and, now, you. There are far worse things to do than look at the water. But, don’t worry, soon there will be more to do than look at the water. Soon, we’ll begin casting nets and, if fortune is our friend, pull them in, laden with fish.”

“Well, I am not interested in fishing, Morfar, so let’s go back home. I have more interesting things to do than catch fish.”

“Ah, we will go back home in good time. First, I will show you how I catch fish. Next, I will show you how I sell some of the fish I catch to put pickles and vegetables on our table. Finally, when we are back on shore, I will show you how I smoke fish to make the meals we eat.”

[This began as a children’s story. What? John writing a children’s story? Yeah, but you see he gave up midstream. I’m not so good at allegory. I may finish this some day, well before I become a Norwegian grandfather.]

 

Posted in Fiction, Writing | Leave a comment

Alacrán

alacran-2I know just a little about scorpions (alacránes in Spanish) thanks in part to my chance encounter with a mother scorpion and her brood of about a dozen babies upon arriving at a bed & breakfast in a village in Mexico a number of years ago. The B&B, operated by a former nun who I gather had seen the error of her ways, was home for just a night or two in advance of my brother’s return home, where he and his wife would thereafter serve as hosts. The scorpion and her clinging children had been captured by the B&B owner’s housekeeper, who had placed them in a glass jar to delight arriving guests. News that one’s lodging might be awash in scorpions does not guarantee a good night’s sleep. It does, however, offer an incentive to seek information about scorpions.

Baby scorpions are born alive, not hatched from eggs, the way insects make their way into the world. When they are born, the brood of scorpions (which can number one hundred) crawl upon their mothers’ backs and ride for up to three weeks until their soft exoskeleton stiffens and hardens. At that point, if they’ve survived that long, they are ready to grow into the fearsome beasts worthy of symbolic tattoos drawn and inked in their honor.

Speaking of tattoos, if I were to get one, I think I might want one of a scorpion, if for no other reason that the scorpion’s extensive symbolism (according to websites upon which I stumbled this morning while reacquainting myself with scorpion lore):

  • Power
  • Energy
  • Stealth
  • Warning
  • Mystery
  • Healing
  • Strategy
  • Survival
  • Protection
  • Rebellion
  • Attachment
  • Aggression
  • Retaliation
  • Transition
  • Calculated
  • Mysticism
  • Resilience
  • Guardianship
  • Self-defense
  • Altered perception
  • Sex
  • Control
  • Transition
  • Death/Dying
  • Passion
  • Treachery
  • Protection
  • Defensiveness
  • Solitary/Being Alone

The one symbolic element that drew my attention more than the others, aside from sex, is treachery, as in “old age and treachery always triumph over youth and skill” or “old age and treachery will always overcome youth and exuberance.” Those themes, or variations thereof, have appealed to me for many years. What does that tell you?

But back to scorpions and the reason they are on my mind this Saturday morning. I’ve been capturing them in record numbers on the glue boards I leave inside both sides of my garage door. This morning, I went into the garage where I found two very large scorpions, one attached to each of the two glue boards.  Seeing the two sentries guarding, albeit involuntarily, the entry to the grand hall that is my garage triggered my interest in recollecting and learning more about the beasts.  Aside from learning of the arachnid’s symbolism as imagined by some humans, I learned that between 1750 and 2000 species of scorpions have been identified, only twenty-five to forty of which are known to have venom capable of killing humans. For species in the U.S., treatment for scorpion stings is usually not necessary except for children, the old, and the infirm. But stings can be godawful painful, from what I’ve read.

As I read about scorpions this morning, what fascinated me as much as anything was the sheer number of species. One thousand seven hundred and fifty to two thousand. What?! That’s incredible! But that’s nothing, really. I did a bit more research about the breadth of and depth of distinctive species of various creatures.  What I learned was that an estimated 35,000 to 40,000 species of  spiders (labeled air-breathing arthropods by some clever science writer) exist, about 3,000 species of which are found in North America.

All right. I’ve done my science research for the day. Now, it’s time to focus on where I’ll place the tattoo I might one day get. And which image of alacrán I’ll want inked into my flesh.

Posted in Just Thinking | Leave a comment

Struggle Against the Wind

I struggle against the wind on the
desolate beach, wet sand caressing
my feet, as slivers of broken silica,
progeny of crystalline boulders
a million years old, compete with
water and seashells for their
place on the planet, offering
my bare toes a place to endure
the waves’ battle with the shore.

Away from the water, bone dry sand
from shifting dunes takes angry flight,
driven by a monstrous gale, bathing
the sky in suffocating beige sheets that
flood my raw cheeks with waves of stinging
rebukes for my choice to walk alone,
to face a hurricane of my own making,
an emotional storm spawned by my reaction
to words that wounded my misplaced pride.

As I make my way in self-imposed solitude,
the water in the turbulent grey clouds above,
too heavy with sorrow for the air to hold,
flushes sand from the roiling sky in sheets of
rain that wash the anger from my face,
replacing it with torrential waves of regret
well-suited to the squalls that spawned
this solitary struggle against the wind.

Posted in Poetry, Writing | 2 Comments

Unity is an Appealing Objective

People who attend the church (I really wish there was another name for it; I have issues with calling it a church) that I’ve been visiting periodically tell me they, and the church, are viewed in deeply unfavorable ways by some of the more “mainstream” churches in the area. They are disappointed in others’ perception of them and the church, but they don’t seem to return the contempt. Rather, they seem to hope that, over time, others who misunderstand and mislabel Unitarian Universalism (UU) will grow to understand that its approach is not one that deserves to be reviled. Were I more invested in the church, I would be livid at being branded in such ways. But I’m not, and members of the church certainly are more patient and understanding than I, anyway.

Despite the fact that Unitarian Universalists tend to be progressive, open, and willing to accept the rights of individuals to hold whatever belief they wish, some religious sects (forgive me while I label them fringe cults) view them as the devil’s spawn. Excuse me? What the devil did I just say? But it’s true, apparently. I read online a Baptist minister’s attack on Unitarians; he wrote a scathing letter to the editor of some tiny backwoods town in Kentucky, labeling Unitarians as something akin to Satan in shorts. It was an appalling diatribe and especially ironic coming from a man steeped in the “gentle faith.”

I find it especially annoying to read vitriolic attacks on UU, its adherents, and friends from people who do not have the faintest idea of the way in which the organization operates, nor what its members believe or do not believe. I see similar attacks on Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists; you name it. At any rate, the church I occasionally attend welcomes people of all, or no, faiths; Christians, Jews, Muslims, Atheists, Agnostics, Pagans—you name it—every is welcome.

The way in which that can occur in a church is that UU does not promote nor enforce a creed. Rather, it says, quite plainly (from its website): “Unitarian Universalism is a non-creedal faith. Accordingly, individual members of our UUVC congregation are free to search for truth on many paths. While our congregation upholds shared principles individual Unitarian Universalists may discern their own beliefs about spiritual, ethical, and theological issues.”

That structural dimension of UU is what allows Baptists and Methodists and Catholics and Atheists and Pagans to fit in comfortably, provided they can understand the way in which the members of the congregation view one another and the world around them. Before each weekly program, the people assembled in this little church are asked to affirm a covenant between one another, as follows:

Love is the doctrine of this church,
And the quest of truth its sacrament,
And service its prayer.
To dwell together in peace,
To seek knowledge in freedom,
To serve humankind in fellowship;
To the end that all souls shall grow
Into harmony with the good.
Thus do we covenant with one another.

That does not infringe on anyone’s rights to believe whatever they wish about a divine being, or the lack thereof. I suppose the church’s insistence that everyone has the freedom to think and not be bound by religious dogma is the thing that sticks in some craws. I view it as a highly evolved attitude; others view it, apparently, as sacrilege or worse. Each month, as I attend (or don’t), and find that the congregation has adopted another charity to which members are encouraged to consider supporting (and which the church does), I am impressed with the humanity of the people who support and lead the church. In the past few months, some of the “causes” the church has supported include:

  • Green Leadership
  • Oaklawn Migant Workers
  • Fair Trade
  • Bridges Out of Poverty
  • The Caring Place
  • Garland County Imagination Library
  • Arkansas Red Cross
  • Arkansas Hospice
  • Jackson House
  • Computers 4 Kids
  • Ouachita Childrens Center

I don’t know; how can an organization that supports, and encourages its members to support, humanitarian causes like these be subject to labeling as an anti-Christian or anti-religion group?

The UU church does all the things more “traditional” churches have long done (and for which I applaud those more traditional churches), but without demanding a theology that conflicts with my view of the world and that does not demand my acceptance of a history (across many religions and sects) of violence and societal discord.

Am I writing this to encourage you (or anyone) to join the Unitarian Universalist church? No. I am not even a member; I attend as a guest or a friend and have no plans to (and seriously doubt I ever will) join. I’m writing this to get an irritant off my chest. And to introduce a “religion” (again, I don’t much like the word in this context) that I find appealing and very compassionate and human. I’m not a religious joiner. If I were, maybe I’d join UU. It’s probably the only one I’d ever consider joining.

Posted in Church, Just Thinking, Religion | Leave a comment

Man of Leisure

Last night, as I watched a bit of Jimmy Fallon’s The Tonight Show, an image from a show guest’s childhood—an image in which the guest was wearing a leisure suit—resurrected in me a long-lost memory. I once owned a leisure suit; maybe more than one. I remember one quite clearly, though. It was sky blue. I wore it to work, more than once, when I got my first professional job after finishing my undergraduate degree. I think I had a light green one, as well; it would have been an odd hue somewhere between pale avocado and smoky sage. Though I was just an intern, not a long-term employee, I had to dress professionally. And a sky blue leisure suit fit the bill. Back then, in 1975 and 1976, leisure suits were fashionable. By the early 1980s, they were passé in the extreme.

Though I loathed, then and now, the garish muted wash colors, along with the odd, crepe-like fabric of the leisure suit(s) I wore, I rather liked the concept; I did not like the execution. I still like the concept. If an updated leisure suit were introduced today, I might wear one. I like the idea of comfortable, sophisticated semi-casual business (and social) wear. I did not like the weird fabrics and offensively strange colors of the suits I recall from my post-graduate youth. But I could readily give my support to a reimagined, modern, nicely tailored leisure suit. I can’t quite adequately express this next thought, but the style of leisure suit I envision would fit nicely—in material, color, and style—with the Frank Lloyd Wright Usonian style of architecture. Though I can’t describe it, I would know such a suit if I saw it. I suspect it would be a medium charcoal grey, perhaps a muted pattern seersucker or other breathable, cooling fabric. Something refined, understated, and comfortably casual. In my regime as unquestioned ruler of this world and all others, I would decree neckties an abomination unto humanity and its relatives. No one would wear ties, upon pain of being force-fed fast-food fish sticks for the rest of their natural lives (which, of course, would be dramatically shortened by the consumption of fast-food fish sticks).

Odd, isn’t it, how old memories buried under the detritus of time and experience can suddenly pop fully-formed in one’s head? And it’s equally strange that such recollections can prompt a creative re-imagining of something so mundane as leisure wear. I doubt I am in danger of becoming a fashion designer.

 

Posted in Fashion, Memories | Leave a comment

Fruitless Pursuit

I awoke at just after 3 this morning with the expectation that I would conquer the world before daylight. This did not occur.

I attempted my conquest only to be repelled by rational thought and struck by the reality that the world cannot be conquered by a mere man. Consequently, I vowed to overcome my ‘mereness’ before my next vain attempt. In the interim, I will live in relative peace and obscurity as a watcher. A watcher is one who, as you might have guessed, watches, which in turn tells time. The time is now 7:00 a.m. and the day is Wednesday, which translates into this: I must prepare for school. School, for me, involves playing with mud, with the objective of making masks. I will depart before too much more time passes for the sculpture studio where I practice my playtime. Until then, I will continue to drink my black coffee and ponder the imponderables. Have you ever spent time pondering the imponderables? You know, those things that cannot be fully understood or measured? Such an endeavor requires significant expenditures of mental energy that could otherwise be spent on productive thought. Productive thought; that’s an interesting word pair. Productive thought, it seems to me, would be thought that creates some tangible outcome. If that’s correct, and it is, the first word is redundant; all thought creates some tangible outcome. Although, the tangibility of that outcome might be open to debate. And, by the way, how can the first word in a phrase be redundant? You’d think the second word would carry the redundancy, wouldn’t you? Of course you would. But you, like me, understand the imponderability of primary versus secondary redundancy. Now that has been said and settled, I shall leave this jumble of letters and words to engage in some other fruitless pursuit.

Oh, by the way, I just realized this is post number 2,010 since I started this blog. I missed a major milestone by ten posts. I have 990 more to go before the next major milestone. And 490 to go before the next minor milestone. I wonder what adjective might describe milestones that are even less important than minor ones?

Posted in Absurdist Fantasy, Art, Sculpture | Leave a comment

Insight

 

I remind myself frequently, if not always intentionally, that I do not know the struggles others face. I am not privy to the personal challenges, the emotional tribulations, or the overwhelming depressions that might explain the behavior of other people. I know the private churning within me that I allow to bring out the worst in me; but I don’t see inside other people the way I see inside myself.

I realize my outward expression of internal angst can be unpleasant; not just for me, but for those who interact with me. And so, too, I suspect it is with the behavior of other people who, from time to time, I encounter. Behavior in others that seems irrational or unnecessarily confrontational can annoy me. But when I fight the inclination to condemn the person for the behavior, I get a glimpse at the person I would rather be than the person I usually am.

Posted in Just Thinking | Leave a comment

Shades of Gray

I woke up to face a reality I did not expect to endure. It’s a reality that never occurred to me, really. A reality that suggests I may be out of touch with reality in some fundamental ways; ways that suggest I live a life detached from the cruel foundation of the lives of so many others. Let me explain.

A young woman I know announced to the world this morning, via Facebook, that her relationship with a college at which she had been teaching for five years is ending. I know nothing more than that; but as I try to read between the lines, I think I read that it’s not her choice. It’s not something she decided to do. With my limited knowledge of her circumstances, I think her departure is apt to be a painful dislocation. I suspect she has very limited resources, very limited income; the termination of her employment with the college could be catastrophic for her. Again, I don’t know the details; it’s possible she is leaving to accept another opportunity that will put her on solid financial footing. But I suspect not. If my suspicions are correct, she is a step closer to financial ruin.

I am just an acquaintance. I am not a close friend. What can I do? What should I do? What is the appropriate role of an acquaintance who may be witnessing the financial collapse of another person’s life? If I were a man of means, I might offer financial aid. But I’m not a man of means. Yet I am in far better shape, financially, than she is. At what point does one opt to suffer a little to alleviate the suffering of someone else?

Would I think I have an obligation if I thought she were a friend and not simply an acquaintance? At what point does an acquaintance become a friend? Where is the dividing line between compassion and obligation? Where does one draw the line between wishing one could help and feeling compelled to do so?

I suppose the first step to answering all of my questions would be to get more facts. But it’s hard to ask someone—a mere acquaintance—if she needs help. And it’s inadvisable, I think, to ask the question about whether help is needed unless the follow-up is, unquestionably, an offer to provide it.

Shades of gray. Too damn many shades of gray.

Posted in Compassion, Emotion, Friendship | Leave a comment