The “top photos of the week by AP photojournalists” give rise to emotions ranging from sorrow to compassion to rage to appreciation to awe. When I right-click to open an image in a new tab, then enlarge the resulting photo, I can see much more than I would if I had simply glanced at the picture as originally produced on the screen. For example, yesterday morning I opened and enlarged this image, which was captioned as follows: “Smoke and flames rise from an Israeli military strike on a building in the Zeitoun neighborhood of Gaza City, Feb. 6, 2026.” The original image offered an overview of a scene from war. The much larger one allows me to see more clearly what the original almost hid in the overview: airborne shrapnel caused by the attack; a collection of what looked like headstones in a cemetery; men reacting, the moment it happened, to the explosive bombardment; and posters with photos of men who, I presume, were buried beneath the headstones. Other photos included in the AP collection were emotionally moving, as well: a woman evacuating a wounded dog after a Russian aerial strike hit a stray dog shelter in Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine; a striking image from the Bad Bunny performance during the Super Bowl halftime show; and Turkana women getting water from a Kenyan well; among others. Photos, when studied carefully, have the capacity to open one’s mind to the experiences they capture—they are more than mere pictures, they engage viewers, thrusting them into the experience. The work of skilled and insightful photographers impresses me; both their technical skills and their ability to understand and capture the emotions of the experience astonish me.
+++
I see it all perfectly; there are two possible situations – one can either do this or that. My honest opinion and my friendly advice is this: do it or do not do it – you will regret both.
Soren Kierkegaard
+++
Speaking of photographs…I think we should consider them visual aids, like binoculars or eyeglasses, because they help us see more clearly. Photos eliminate the distractions of movement—the sometimes chaotic fog of images-in-motion that effectively hide or disguise much of what is in front of our eyes. Visual debris diverts our attention and effectively hides clarity behind a cluttered haze of kinetic distortion. Photographs, mimicking microscopes, allow us to peer intently at extreme close-ups of images that would be lost in a passing glance—or even a focused stare.
+++
During an interview by David Marchese, summarized in a recent edition of the New York Times, Michael Pollan said, “Consciousness has become our secular substitute for the soul…” That comment, in the context of a discussion involving awareness, artificial intelligence (AI), and what David Chalmers has called the “hard problem” of “how you get from matter to mind, how you cross that huge gulf from neurons to subjective experience,” intrigues me. The idea that consciousness or awareness might be available to AI is fascinating and frightening. Marchese introduced the article about the interview with the following: “For as long as I can remember, I’ve wrestled with my own thoughts and feelings about identity. Why am I, David, the person I am?” Except for the fact that I have never referred to myself as David, I could have spoken those sentences—asked that question. These matters bounce around in my head, attempting without success to understand what, exactly, constitutes a person’s identity. Thought-provoking questions— like why some of our human functions (e.g., moving my arms) require conscious awareness and why some (e.g., digestion and heart rate) don’t—could occupy my mind around the clock, if I let them. Such questions lead me to others…whether, for instance, there exists a clearly identifiable point at which consciousness and its absence intersect. The intensity of my fierce curiosity about such issues slams against an immovable wall after a while. The complexity of all the supportive and conflicting ideas that surround these questions suddenly becomes so tangled and convoluted that my energy is no longer sufficient to keep pursuing answers; I abandon the questions—exhausted and angry and convinced that my interest is pointless and the answers to the questions are either wrong or non-existent.
+++
My one regret in life is that I am not someone else.
Woody Allen
+++
Yesterday afternoon, my anger and its expression in my behavior left me feeling drained and regretful and ashamed for the first time in quite a while. A few simple and, in hindsight, understandable mistakes on an invoice given to me spurred an angry reaction from me. And that anger spurred the revival and intensification of unrelated anger that, in turn, led me to direct a loud, unpleasant outburst to a man who did not deserve such wrathful fury. The crowning “offense” was the man’s umpteenth time mispronouncing my name, even after he was corrected several times. Annoying to me, yes; but deserving of such public vilification, no. My reactions to those triggers were like those I used to have regularly. As I think about these things, it occurs to me that the sharp reduction in such outbursts may have paralleled the start of a prescription for anti-anxiety/anti-depression pharmaceuticals. I have not stopped, nor even paused, that prescription; there may be no connection at all. But, still, I wonder why the old reactive personality experienced such a volcanic eruption. It bears watching, which I shall. I owe the guy an apology.
+++
