A Feast for September 7

Last night, my wife and I had dinner with friends. The woman made feijoada, a Brazilian black bean, pork, and sausage stew her husband had requested. Years ago, he had spent some time in Brazil and discovered his affinity for the stuff. Knowing our passion for foods from other lands and our adventurous culinary natures, she invited us to be guinea pigs to try the recipe she used. The feijoada was wonderful, as expected. We’ve had it before. My wife reminded me that the first time we ate feijoada was in Portugal. I thought it was a Brazilian original, but this morning’s research informed me otherwise. Portuguese feijoada à Transmontana is the traditional and original feijoada , according to Father Google and his minions. We later ate feijoada  in a tiny Brazilian restaurant in Richardson, Texas. This morning’s internet exploration revealed a Brazilian restaurant at/near the location I remembered, however the name is different; this one is called Blue Charcoal but I think it had a different name when we ate there years ago and were treated to a wonderful explanation of Brazilian foods.

Before my exploration this morning into the genesis of the dish, I learned a bit more of Brazilian cuisine and culture. Yesterday, as I whiled away a rainy, cold afternoon, I read about other Brazilian dishes. I learned about acarajé (Brazilian black-eyed pea fritters stuffed with shrimp). I read about and longed for vatapá de peixe e camarao (a favorite Brazilian fish and shrimp stew). My mouth watered as I read recipes for shrimp moqueca, a traditional dish in Afro-Brazilian culture in the Brazilian state of Bahia. I looked at mouth-watering pictures of pão de queijo, little cheese-stuffed pastry snacks that I believe would make an excellent breakfast. And I discovered that farofa, which consists of fried manioc flour, is sprinkled over many dishes, especially those involving rice, to enhance flavor and texture. If I’m not mistaken, the accompaniment to last night’s feijoada  included farofa.

But if you’ve read this far, and if you noticed the title of this post, you may be wondering about the significance of September 7. That is the day Brazilians celebrate their independence from Portugal (Dia da Independência). I know this because I was looking for a proper celebratory excuse. Just as we use Cinco de Mayo as an excuse to have a Mexican food party, I’d like to use  Sete de Setembro as an excuse to have a Brazilian food party. I would have used dia da Tiradentes, the day commemorating the execution of Joaquim Jose da Silva Xavier, a Brazilian revolutionary and founder of the Inconfidência Mineira movement; but, that event is celebrated in April, too close to Cinco de Mayo. Almost one hundred years after he was hanged in 1789, Brazil did, indeed, win independence from Portugal in 1882. Incidentally, Tiradentes was the nickname given to the honored hero, who was a dentist; tiradentes means “tooth puller” in Portuguese.

And before I go, just a tad more information about Brazil. Until the end of August, Dilma Vana Rousseff served as president of Brazil. But, as you probably read, she was impeached and removed from office. Her vice president, Michel Temer, was named president after her removal. He had been serving as acting president since May, when Rousseff was suspended from office for her impeachment trial. Before September 7, I’ll want my guests (if I actually throw the party) to learn as much as they can about Brazil, its history, and its current state of affairs so the food-fest will be about more than satisfying our hunger for Brazilian food.

Posted in Food, History | Leave a comment

Absolution

Regret arises as readily from actions not taken as from mistakes made. The life unlived, due to efforts unmade, takes as much of a toll on one’s psyche as choosing the path of least resistance with a vengeance. Regret becomes a torment with no remedy if we permit ourselves to dwell on opportunities not taken, decisions not made, and risks avoided. The challenge is to forgive ourselves for being who we are. The absolution is more difficult than the punishment.

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

Generations Hence

Sprained egos drag themselves over self-made walls,
edging ever closer to places where fences
never kept courage at bay, but tried.
Certainty, in dire need of atonement,
spills into pools of doubt, as time erodes
the barricades built of false bravado,
unearned pride, and fear sired by ignorance.

Hope, unchecked by brutal experience and anguish,
steers even the most hopeless of the throngs
toward possibilities and wishes, dream and visions
that might, generations hence, be recognized and
realized in a time gentler than the fury of today.
Tenure and age teach us lessons that require a lifetime
to learn, lessons that pay dividends only to the future.

There’s a reconciliation coming, a meeting of the minds between
rage and revolt, fury and forgiveness, inadequacy and indulgence,
power and submission. There’s a time coming, a time beyond
partisan healing, a time of reckless compassion, intent not
on repair but on rebirth, a time in which understanding
conquers judgement and acceptance overtakes pronouncements.
Generations hence, solutions will prevail. Generations hence.

Posted in Poetry, Writing | Leave a comment

The Dictionary of Peace

Sanguine. How often do you hear people use that word in conversation? Yeah, I don’t hear it often, either. But I wish we would. Would that a larger proportion of the population sought out more expansive vocabularies. Would that more people attached value to knowledge and its quest. Lately, as we hear a man who has been elected president speak at a level of vocabulary suited to conversation with third-graders (save for the expletives), it seems the level of intelligence of the population at large is dipping into the single digits. Language, through the extent of vocabulary, offers a good measure of intelligence. Not that mathematics does not; comprehension of mathematics, too, provides a gauge of intellect. But the extent of one’s grasp of his mother tongue parallels, I think, the extent of one’s understanding of the world in which one lives. The correlation is imperfect; I know of plenty of people whose vocabularies far exceed mine who are deviant monsters, suitable targets for public service euthanasia. But, as a general rule, the larger the vocabulary, the more knowledgeable the person. I suppose that statement proves my bias. Many people who are unfortunate enough to live in poverty have not had the same good fortune as I to pursue education; that does not equate to a lack of intellect but, rather, a lack of opportunity. So, I may be arguing against myself as I think this through. But I think the expanse of one’s language does mirror the expanse of one’s intellectual capacity. That’s true, in my mind, regardless of whether the limits on language were imposed by circumstances or by the capacities of one’s brain.

This little conversation with myself awakens me to an uncomfortable realization that I may, indeed, unintentionally equate poverty with ignorance. That’s not where I intended to go with this. And it’s not what I believe; at least it’s not what I think I believe. Poverty is not a symptom of inferior intellect or knowledge; it is the outcome of systemic deficiencies. Sometimes, those deficiencies might be exacerbated by inferior intellect, but even people whose intellectual wherewithal surpasses the rest of us can be beaten by “the system.” And, back to my mention of the soon-to-be Cheetoh in Chief, deficient language skills (or, at least, deficient usage) does not necessarily parallel poverty; in some cases, speaking and behaving like a third grader with under-developed empathy and compassion goes hand in glove with obscene wealth.

My conversation this morning troubles me. I wish I were more of a tea drinker; I understand sitting quietly and drinking tea tends to bring peace to one’s perspective. I am drinking coffee and feeling an unquenchable desire to operate a guillotine. Perhaps I better go read “The Dictionary of Peace.”  Is there such a book?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ensteubulous Thursday

Soft, early morning light filtered through the windows when I woke up this morning, a highly unusual circumstance for someone who’s up well before dawn almost every day. Why I slept in is beyond me. But sleep in I did. The clock said the time was ten minutes after six. I believed it; the light told me the clock did not lie. What does one do when confronted with oversleeping? There is only one satisfactory answer: one makes miso soup. Fortunately, I picked up a package of firm tofu a few days ago and I keep miso paste in the refrigerator for just such an emergency, along with green onions, so I was ready. Except that I had no wakame (seaweed). But one soldiers on, even in the face of such fierce adversity, so I made the miso soup without the wakame. When my wife awoke shortly after seven, the aroma of freshly made miso soup greeted her (as did I) as she stepped out of the bedroom into the living room/kitchen/dining room special combo space. I ladled miso soup into two bowls and placed a plate containing mandarin orange slices and radishes on the table between us. We enjoyed the Japanese-inspired breakfast, then went about our day. Then, just moments ago, I discovered that I had left the sliced green onions in the refrigerator. Horrors! We had eaten miso soup that lacked not only wakame, but green onions! The complexion of the day suddenly shifted from bright and ensteubulous (that’s my neologism currently in vogue) to dim and starchatic (another one, just not as commonly used in written banter). But, just in the nick of time, as my mood plunged from glorious to gloomy, I snatched my brain back from the edge of the abyss, reminding myself that sunny Thursdays never tolerate glumness. So, the day’s complexion has returned to ensteubulous. I now return to my regularly scheduled programming.

Posted in Food, Language | 1 Comment

Toilets and the F Word

Who doesn’t get excited about shopping for toilets? I mean, what could be more riveting than talking about flush capacity, gallons per flush, blah, blah, blah? I want to remodel the bathroom. My wife simply wants to replace the toilet.  Okay. It needs replacing. The crack in the porcelain is bothersome; worst case, it could be a really shitty problem. Forgive my language and punstership. But if we’re going to replace one, why not replace both of the toilets in the main part of the house (the one in the work room behind the garage can remain)? Yeah, okay. But what kind do we want? Single flush? Double flush? One-piece? Two-piece? National brand?  Cheaper cousin?

We have reached a temporary compromise. Double flush (said to be noisy) off-brand (but probably okay) that a company in Hot Springs sells and will install (and take away the old ones). We’ll call tomorrow. But I want to remodel the master bath. I mean, new shower, new flooring, new tile, new mirrors, the works. I may have to marry again for that to happen. Or she may have to use my insurance money to do the same.

I’d do it myself if I could get my wife out of the house for the twenty weeks it would take me to do the job to my satisfaction. But she is a homebody.

Damn is too weak a word for what I feel like screaming now. My word begins with an F and ends with something else.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Crossing My Own Borders

Just moments ago, I wrote an email to a friend that included a comment about tamales. I said “…my tamales do not compare to those made by little old Mexican grandmothers whose recipes for pork and jalapeño tamales involve lard and magic.” I think, with that comment, I hit on a truth many people do not fully understand. The finest Christmas Eve tamales do, indeed, require equal measures of lard and magic, woven together during tamaladas, (tamale-making parties).  As I contemplate the rich Mexican and Mexican-American cultures that gave rise to tamaladas and Christmas Eve tamales, I realize I am part of Mexican-American culture, despite not being Mexican-American. In spite of my English ancestry, I think I embrace Mexican and Mexican-American culture as fully as, if not more fully than, my own. I grew up eating arroz con camarones, arroz con pollo, calabacitas, tamales, chiles rellenos, and a variety of other foods either inspired or created by people of Mexican ancestry. But it’s not just the food. I love the traditions, even the ones that rest on religious foundations, like Dia de los Muertos. The fierce attachment to family that I see in Mexican culture appeals to me, too. And the generosity and kindness that seems firmly rooted in Mexican culture draws me in. I realize, of course, that generalizations and stereotypes have plenty of exceptions, but in a broad sense I think Mexican culture is gentler and more willing to embrace diversity in almost every area than is the culture of the U.S.

I’ve written before, possibly many times, about the connection I feel with the U.S./Mexico border. Though I understand some possibilities that might explain that connection, I do not claim to know, with any certainty, the genesis of my affinity. This morning, as I sat contemplating my appreciation for Mexican and Mexican-American cultures, I searched my blog to see how many posts here include the term “Mexican.” I was surprised that nearly three percent (2.7449%, actually) of my posts include that word; 58 of 2113 posts. That must reveal something. I just don’t know precisely what. And what is the meaning of the fact that 1.8% of my posts contain the word “Indian?” I don’t know that, either.

On Christmas day three years ago (and probably before and since), I wrote about Mexican-Indian fusion. I even proffered names of a storefront chaat-taqueria I might open one day. Here are two of them:

  • Taqueria Mumbai
  • Chana Tijuana

I think food drives my brain. And this tells me I must include foods, favorite foods, in my writing if I am ever to be successful as a writer. So, I taught myself something this morning.

Posted in Food, Mexico, Philosophy, Writing | 2 Comments

A Shattering Announcement

We’ve always been told that the sun would continue to burn properly for another five billion years before it swells to a red giant, so Earth wouldn’t turn to a cinder for almost that long. Yesterday afternoon’s news, announcing that Mercury’s and Mars’ orbits have shifted radically and the chances are eight in ten the planets will collide with Earth within the next three years, changed all that. The news, predictably, caused global panic. I find it more than a little amusing that there’s been a run on milk and bread in almost every city worldwide in the last eighteen hours, as if milk and bread will somehow soften the blow of the end of the world as we know it. I’ve wondered how humankind might react to news of its impending annihilation. Now I know. We stock up on staples.

Stock markets hate uncertainty and, even with eight in ten odds, the stock market considered the news uncertain. So, naturally, stocks tanked. That’s an understatement. A drop of eighteen thousand points from the Dow’s high of just over nineteen thousand is more than tanking. Some big corporations reacted yesterday and today as if the astrophysicists had said the odds are one hundred percent. The CEO of General Motors, for example, responded “What’s the point?” when asked why he announced his decision this morning to shut all manufacturing plants and, then, with little fanfare, just walked off the job. But others see opportunity in the likely destruction of our planet. Diego Macintosh, the founder of SpaceMantra, offered an escape; the first seventy people who each can deliver 250 million dollars to his door are assured a seat on his space exploration craft, set to take off next March. I guess he figures with seventeen billion, five hundred million dollars in hand, he can enjoy his remaining time on Earth. These reactions demonstrate just how fast news travels. But not everyone got the news so quickly.

This morning, I called a friend who lives in a small town in far north British Columbia. She’s not much of a fan of television news and newspapers and she rarely goes online. Her initial reaction was that I was just pulling her leg. Only after I convinced her to turn on the television did she begin to comprehend the gravity of what I’d been telling her. And then she said, “Well, if there’s nothing to be done, there’s nothing to be done. I’ve always said it’s a waste of time to worry about things over which you have no control. So, who do you think will win the World Series next year? Any predictions?”

Posted in Absurdist Fantasy | Leave a comment

Decency

“Find your passion and you’ll never work a day in your life.” It’s such a pithy, positive, hopeful statement! I’ve been searching for my passion for my entire life and I still haven’t found it. I’ve found interests. I’ve found intriguing pastimes. I’ve found hobbies and appealing distractions. But I haven’t found my passion. Food is the closest thing to it, I think. But that’s not it. I tire of recipes and cooking just as quickly as I tire of reading and writing and hiking and walking and engaging in interesting philosophical conversations. I’ve come to the conclusion that, at least for some of us, “find your passion and you’ll never work a day in your life” is an aphorism based in wishful thinking. I so wish I could find that passion. Something so consuming that I would be compelled to get up every morning and pursue it. But I haven’t found it. And that bothers me.

At various points in my life, I thought the passion had to be something that made the world a better place. I wanted to be consumed by something important, valuable, interesting, intriguing. I wanted to think that what I do each day matters. I admire people who know exactly what their contributions are to making a better world are and who, in that knowledge, follow their passion. I’m not one of them. I just stumble along, searching for something that matters and that commands my undying interest. So far, that dual-purpose something has remained hidden.

Lately, I’ve come to the conclusion that one’s passion need not be an undertaking that changes the world. Even something trivial to the world but all-consuming to oneself would be fine. Something about which one is so passionate that it’s like breathing; one couldn’t even fathom living one’s life each day without doing it. It could be golf or painting (but it’s neither for me). That single-purpose something continues to elude me.

I realize my desire for finding my passion is selfish, egotistical, and utterly unimportant in a world in which so many people are looking for more important things than self-fulfillment, things like adequate food and clean water and protection from war. Maybe seeking (and finding) one’s passion offers protection against the realization that the world is a brutal place. That leads me to another question: why is it that self-sacrifice in the name of decency is so revered? I think it’s because decency often seems in such short supply, yet we all yearn for it. Maybe that’s the passion I’m after. Decency.

“He retired from a career in indecency to pursue a decent retirement. ” Still, where is that elusive passion?

Posted in Philosophy | 2 Comments

Place to Place

I’m imagining what I might experience this morning if I had awakened outside Albuquerque, New Mexico instead of in the Ouachita Mountains of Arkansas. My recollection of the topography of Albuquerque may be off, so if this description doesn’t make sense in the real world, I’ll chalk it up to poor memory.

A thin thatch of silver and white clouds with the depth and texture of gauze stretches high across the sky. Sunlight shines through them as if shining through a film so translucent as to be nearly transparent. The ghost of the crescent moon, too, peeks through while the brightest stars give way to daylight, one by one, as the day begins. To the east, the western slope of the Sandia Mountains remains in near-darkness, while the sun makes its way over the horizon. To the west the valley floor brightens. Something about the morning seems taut and ready to lunge forward, as if the early morning hours were caught on a piece of metal snagged on the ridge of the mountains; once the temperature warms sufficiently, the mountain will lose its grip and the day will spring on me like a leopard.

Maybe that’s how it would go. But here in the Ouachitas, the day has been creeping along in a thick fog, hiding the sun and moon and stars behind a blanket. Even the wind can’t get through the morass of wet air. The leaves on the trees outside my window remain motionless, as if they had been painted on a canvas. The forest floor, awash in rust colored leaves, pouts. I feel this day moving along in a wave of cooling wax, a lethargic river wanting nothing more than to puddle and end its ceaseless trip to the sea.

Posted in Writing | Leave a comment

Pithless Observation

Using rational arguments to counter positions based solely on emotion is possible, but the undertaking is fraught with frustration, like eating thin chicken broth with a salad fork. Both require discipline, time, and acceptance of almost imperceptible progress. But attacking the chicken broth in said manner carries the benefit of weight loss, while rational arguments generally bring no such satisfaction.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Giving Thanks, Even Now

Last year, on Thanksgiving day, the subject of a rant on this blog was the minimum wage. It was the second of two, in which I presented arguments—both pro and con—about increasing the minimum wage. My intent in writing the two pieces was to remove emotion from the arguments and rely, instead, entirely on economic principles. This morning, in reading the two pieces (November 25 in opposition to increasing the minimum wage and November 26 in favor of it), it occurred to me that the effort to extract emotion from the argument was a fool’s errand. Economics is one of the social sciences; emotion, therefore, is endemic to the discipline. And, in fact, my emotion won out over my attempt at dispassionate argument against raising the minimum wage. The lesson, for me, is this: compassion will ultimately win in a battle with greed, even greed cleverly disguised as rationality and science. I hope the lesson is based firmly in reality. Happy Thanksgiving. Even in times of uncertainty and fear, I have a lot for which to be thankful. I hope anyone reading this post does, as well.

Posted in Thanksgiving | Leave a comment

Mist Opportunities

Stubble. When I think of that word, in my mind’s eye I see several days’ growth of beard. But the definition that conjures that vision is tertiary, according to the dictionary I just examined. The two definitions with primacy over mine refer to stumps of grain and other stalks left in the field after crops are cut. Why did I look up stubble? Because the word is similar in size and sound to stifle, which I had explored moments earlier. And I explored that word because of its presence in the dictionary definition of smother, which prompted me to go to the dictionary in the first place. The definition of smother, by the way, in the context of steaks and mushrooms, is the tertiary definition of the word: “to cover closely or thickly; envelop.” And, so, there’s a relationship between stubble and smother; the primary definitions I associate with them are ranked as number three in the dictionary. Buried somewhere in these concepts I’m exploring are the seeds of psychosis, aren’t there?

On a whim, after I wrote the words, I searched for “seeds of psychosis” a moment ago and found several articles that incorporate the phrase. Searching for the Seeds of Psychosis was published online on May 1, 2016 in the American Journal of Psychiatry. The Biology of Schizophrenia: The Seeds of Psychosis was published (online) in 2001. Teen Angst May Sow Seeds of Psychosis was published in May 2008.

So, I think some connection must exist between psychosis and alliteration. Stubble. Stifle. Smother. Sow. Searching. Seeds. Schizophrenia. Psychosis. Yes. Moreover, those words begin with sounds that, in the alphabet, precede the letter ‘t’ and follow ‘r,’ don’t they? Clearly this is no accident. This offers solid, irrefutable evidence of a master plan, a Machiavelian plot. All of us, and all of the letters in our alphabets and the sounds emanating from our mouths, are just pawns in a celestial word game. If there’s a flaw in my logic, I don’t see it, because I must be sinking beneath a serous sea of sanity, ceding sway to psychotic swill.

And THAT is how I waste a perfectly good opportunity to write something of merit, choosing instead to write utter drivel lacking any redeeming value. Sometimes, I just gotta do what I gotta do.

Posted in Attempted Humor, Just Thinking | Leave a comment

Oh, Canada, Just Let Me Ramble

I sat in front of the television a while ago, watching a drama series about intrigue and politics in U.S. government. Sipping on a Canadian whiskey and munching on my post-dinner snack of Canadian wild-caught herring in wine sauce, I wondered why I had not been born in Canada. Why, I wondered, did my Canadian sensibilities spring forth in far south Texas, only to be imprisoned in a whirlpool that took me far, far away from a society I know, and knew, was good and proper? Why did I drift northward, living near the Canadian border at one point, only to boomerang south and end up in a state that voted overwhelmingly for Trump?

The answers to those questions reside in fear and reluctance to take risks. Just as I could have moved to Mexico, I could have moved to Canada. Or I could have taken the job of inspector/investigator with the Department of Agriculture when it was offered to me all those many years ago. My life might have been—almost certainly would have been—radically different had I opted to join that investigative team. But I was afraid I might have been assigned to New York City on a salary of $673 per month; I was afraid I would have been forced to live in a one-room apartment with eleven other young men just to be able to pay rent. But it would have been short-term; I would have survived. But I was afraid. Afraid of the idea that I might be expected to carry a gun; I took that as a symbol the job carried greater risks than I was willing to accept.

I find it odd that the vast majority of U.S. citizens do not know the name of the Prime Minister of Canada or the President of Mexico. (Justin Trudeau and Enrique Peña Nieto, respectively, by the way). We live in a bubble, a bubble that chokes our understanding of the relevance and beauty of the diversity of not only the physical characteristics of our planet but the social and political landscape, as well. We seem unable or unwilling to care; unwilling to invest sufficient time to learn about even our closest neighbors.

At what stage in one’s life does a person cross the point beyond which he decides rebelling against his own fears would be pointless? “It’s too late to live a different life; there’s too little of this one left for it to matter.” Even that assertion suggests fear has attached to his DNA.

I think I know why so few people enjoy reading my blog. It’s because I write such depressing stuff. People can stomach only so much of a depressive atmosphere before they begin to seek escape to clear air and oxygen. But that’s all right, too. I can’t let others’ need for oxygen sully my need for truth and exploration that uncovers methane and hydrogen sulfide and carbon monoxide.

But back to my Canadian lifestyle. I feel an affinity to Canadian whiskey and pickled herring. I relish hearing Canadians say “eh” and “aboot.” While I haven’t yet developed a natural attraction to poutine, I feel confident in my ability to acquire a taste for it. I suspect I could become enchanted with donair, the official food of Halifax, Nova Scotia.

I wish I knew people in Canada who might genuinely want me to visit them and would invite me to do so.  I have a sense that I would be able to relax in Canada in a way I’m unable to relax in Arkansas.

[Dammit. I wrote several more paragraphs that were, in my view, beautiful tributes to Canada and, especially, Nova Scotia. And the real heart of the piece, a poignant summation, would have broken hearts. But it was taken by WordPress as it skipped ten beats. Dammit to hell!]

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Adaptations

js_interview_at_nace_1979It’s just after three in the morning and I can’t seem to sleep. Maybe it’s because I seem to have lost a crown on my root-canal tooth. What does one do in such a situation? What else but look at old photos.

This is a Polaroid of me taken by my interviewer, Dale Miller, during an interview for the job of Assistant Technical Activities Director at NACE International, then known as the National Association of Corrosion Engineers.  Despite my obvious babyhood, I got the job. A year later, I was promoted to Technical Activities Director. Then, three years after that, the Executive Director (T.J. Hull) promoted me, again, to Associate Executive Director responsible for the Operations Division (membership, technical activities, meetings, and certification departments). Those were heady days. I thought I was something special, until I came to the conclusion I got the job and the promotions because I was willing to work for a lot less money than people who had equal or even inferior qualifications. I never did quite learn the lesson that realization should have taught, though. Actually, my willingness to live in relative poverty wasn’t the only reason I got the job and the promotions; I worked hard and did a good job. That was my first job in association management. Subsequently, I moved to Chicago to join my wife after she got a job there. This first association job evolved into a career and, eventually, led me to form the business from which I retired early at age 58. I got used to poverty early, so I can adapt to it late. Well, not poverty but certainly not wealth. And I no longer look twenty years younger than my chronological age. We adapt.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Taking Back What We’ve Lost

Earlier today, I attended the Thanksgiving service at the Hot Springs Unitarian Universalist Church, along with my wife. Usually, we do not attend on Sunday when the “church service” is on the schedule. Instead, we attend when “insight” programs (interesting explorations of ideas, typically delivered by someone who’s knowledgeable in the subject under discussion) are scheduled. The services resemble church too much for me; I think my wife feels the same. But, today, because we wanted to support the organization for its annual Thanksgiving program, we decided to attend. My wife made a green bean casserole for the lunch that followed the service.

As we expected, the service reminded me of the unease I felt as a child when I attended church. But there were some interesting elements that made me glad we attended.  For one, the minister read (as a poem) the lyrics to Leonard Cohen’s Anthem, a piece of music I have loved since the first time I heard it (though I must say I think it’s much better and more moving as music, than as poetry). Another reason I was glad we attended was that the service addressed the angst most of the people I know feel at this moment, after the horrifying surprise of Trump’s election. Something the minister said resonated with me; he suggested the members of the congregation should acknowledge and share their vulnerabilities in connection with the election with their friends and neighbors. That, he suggested, could begin the process of enabling us to take hold of the powers we have to connect with others and, ultimately, regain our power to control our own destinies. At least that’s my take on his message. I’m not the guy’s greatest fan by a significant margin, but a few of his comments today rang true. That notwithstanding, I wish he would retreat from his heavy investment in Christianity and magic. But I may be alone in that desire, and it’s not my church after all, so I’ll shut up for now.

Here is Leonard Cohen singing Anthem. His lyrics and his delivery bring tears to my eyes. I hope this video remain available so people visiting this post can see and hear it. I already I miss his gravel voice. He died just a few days ago. The world is lesser for it.

Posted in Music, Thanksgiving | Leave a comment

Courage

Two dictionaries in my house define courage as follows:

  1. the attitude or response of facing and dealing with anything recognized as dangerous, difficult, or painful, instead of withdrawing from it; the quality of being fearless or brave; valor; pluck
  2. the quality of mind or spirit that enables a person to face difficulty, danger, pain, etc., without fear

I choose to use my own modified definition of courage, marrying parts of both dictionary definitions and adding a condition:

  1. the attitude, or quality of mind or spirit, that enables one to face and respond to difficulty, danger, or pain, in spite of one’s fear

In my view, acting fearlessly is not acting courageously. Courage, in my view, requires the conscious decision to behave as if one were fearless in the face of an environment in which the consequences of one’s behavior are likely to bring about difficulty, danger, or pain and, therefore, naturally instill fear.  Yet even my modified definition fails to get to the heart of what I believe courage entails. Courage goes beyond overcoming fear. It involves overcoming the odds, as well. Courage allows one to behave in a way counter to one’s personal best interests in situations or environments in which the likelihood of encountering difficulty, danger, or pain are significantly higher than not encountering those condition. Courage enables behavior that has a better chance of a negative than a positive outcome for the person exhibiting courage.

But there is another side to it; the person exhibiting courage does so in order to increase the chances of a positive outcome for someone or something else. Dashing in front of an oncoming car just to see if one can do it does not exhibit courage; dashing in front of an oncoming car to pull a person out of its path does.

It gets more complex, though, when one’s action or inaction involves multiple ‘others.’ For example, dashing in front of a moving car to save a child may be noble, but if the consequences might be not only in the actor’s death but his family’s anguish, is courage the right word? It takes courage to put oneself in a situation in which one risks death by saving a stranger, but is courage effectively annulled by the potential to cause lifelong grief to a loved one? The action might be viewed as courageous by some, but others might view it as a choice to assign greater value to strangers than to family.

I have no answers. Only questions.

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

A Food Blog, Perhaps

Gochujang Deviled Eggs

Gochujang Deviled Eggs

I’m considering the possibility of adding one more blog to the already innumerable food blogs available on the internet. American Food Bloggers list (as of today) of America’s Best Food Blogs, ranked by popularity and influence, lists 451 food blogs. With that much competition, why would I want to try to create a food blog? Well, first, I don’t consider those food blogs competition; I don’t expect a food blog I might create to find its way onto that list. Nor, for that matter, any list. I just want to have a more convenient place to post recipes, group them by cuisine and such, and make comments about them. And, of course, to post photos of dishes I make. Because…food! (Since I left Facebook, I have no suitable place to post the boatloads of food photos I take.) It would not hurt my feelings in the least, though, if other people who enjoy food and cooking and who do not feel those attributes give them any semblance of superiority over their fellow human beings, would follow the blog and/or post along with me, sharing intriguing morsels about cooking (see what I just did?) along the way.

I do not have a URL yet. I just started thinking about the possibility recently and, frankly, I haven’t given it a whole lot of thought. But I just might do it. The two-year cost for a URL, hosting, and related expenses probably would not exceed $250, given the first-year incentives given by some of the major players out there. That’s a chunk of change, but it’s not outlandish.

A food blog might be an alternative to my deeply-wished-for-book-I-want-to-create, Global Breakfast (breakfasts around the world). Just kicking the idea around. I am passionate about food, but not bat-shit crazy about it; I mean, I realize there are more important things in the world than my interest in food. And maybe, as part of a food blog, I might publish, in tandem, about hunger around the country and around the world and what we—each of us individually and all of us collectively—can do about it.

So, there you are. My latest hair-brained scheme, reveal in its infancy for all the world (or at least four or five visitors) to see.

By the way, I made those gochujang deviled eggs and they were, in my humble opinion, absolutely wonderful.

 

Posted in Food | Leave a comment

A Message in Need of Translation

Not infrequently, I read books or watch films in which main characters reveal, through their words or actions, self-loathing and deep, unrelenting pain based on who they believe they are. Every time, I wonder whether the writers responsible for those characters are writing what they know. I realize these authors may simply be phenomenal writers, observers of the human condition who possess extraordinary insights into the minds of other people and who do not experience the pain they portray in their characters. But I suspect they write from personal experience and intimate exposure to the emotions about which they write. As talented and as gifted as I think they are, I can’t help but think the pain, the ugliness, the fear, and the angst that comes across in the book or film arrives to the consumer’s eyes and mind courtesy of memory, whether personal or as witness to someone else’s pain. The experiences I read about or watch may not be precisely the ones in the experience of the writers, but they are etched in the mind of the person responsible for giving them life. That’s what I think. Of course, I may simply not be as creative as successful novelists and screenwriters and playwrights, etc. If not, then my argument falls apart due to my lack of creativity.

Personally, though, I know that much of what I write rests on my interpretations of experience. The bad guys are, in general, people much like me. Not that I have done all the wrongs committed by them, by any stretch, but I am afraid I share much of their DNA. I try to redeem them by painting them as good people who do bad things. Ultimately, though, we have to accept who we are. If we do bad things, we must own them and their progeny.

That the preceding paragraphs might be considered incoherent drivel does not escape me. But hear me out. Until about three years ago, I did not consider myself a writer. I considered myself someone who liked to write. There is a difference. The former is one who speaks truth, even painful truth, by painting and describing the real world and bringing it alive through words. The latter is a hobbyist who scurries away when the pain of writing reality becomes too much. I have spent much of my writing years in the latter category. And I do not apologize for that. Climbing through a passageway consumed with flames is not something one does unless there’s a decent chance for survival on the other side. But these past few years I’ve been writing with the intent of chipping away at the stone that encases truth, even unrelenting, painful truth that burns like a branding iron.

How I write those considerations, how I make them play out, is what’s more important than who I was. Because writing about who I am and who I was will contribute to the person I will be. The future, always, trumps the past.

Posted in Philosophy, Writing | Leave a comment

The Last Smile

Maria invited him to meet her again, saying she needed to ask his advice about approaching a local political figure with a ticklish, almost accusatory, question. Based on what he later wrote in his journal, he claimed he saw through her charade, though he would play along. They met in a roadside coffee shop. She ordered a cup of chamomile tea and he asked for an espresso. After receiving their drinks at the tiny round table, he began.

“So, what’s this about questioning Tangle McIntire? What do you need to ask him and why is it so hard to ask? You’re a reporter. It’s your job.”

Jobe had a reputation about getting straight to the point, stripping away the niceties. But his words seemed to Maria unnecessarily forceful and lacking in compassion.

“It’s not that it’s so hard, Jobe, it’s that I just want to ask the questions in the right way. I don’t want him to think I’ve already made up my mind about him.”

“But you have, haven’t you? So have I. So has almost anyone within a hundred miles. It’s one thing to be an unbiased journalist, it’s another to be an idiot. Why does his opinion matter so much to you?”

Maria leaned forward and dipped her face toward the table, avoiding his eyes.

“His opinion, not so much. Yours, though, a lot.”

Jobe cocked his head and stared at the crown of her head; she continued, face down, staring at the table.

“Okay. I think it’s time we opened up about this thing. Why did you really ask me to meet you? Is there a thing going on between us? I think there is and I think that’s why I’m here.”

Maria’s head jerked upright.

“A thing? Between us? What makes you think that?”

Jobe’s face flushed. Maria wasn’t sure whether it was anger or embarrassment that brought the color to his face.

“Well, for starters, I know you well enough that you don’t need my advice about asking Tangle McIntire questions. And you’re behaving like someone with a schoolgirl crush.”

Maria stared at Jobe Streeter for fifteen seconds before responding.

“Jobe, I wanted to talk to you first because you’re my friend. My questions to Tangle McIntire are about his relationship with you.”

“His relationship with me? What are you suggesting? You think I’m gay?”

“No, Jobe, I don’t think you’re gay. But I have evidence that suggests you’re involved in a business relationship with McIntire. And that might color your behavior as moderator of the debates.”

Jobe’s mouth opened as in disbelief, then closed into a leering smile.

“Okay, you got me. We’ve formed a company to monopolize Tampa’s gingerbread market. How could you possibly know?”

“Because, Jobe, I have high-resolution video of a meeting between you and McIntire, in which you discuss awarding the Elmont Street bridge contract to JS Construction. And, though ownership of JS Construction was well hidden, I found out who owns it, Jobe.”

Jobe’s leering smile dissolved. Maria watched that smile disappear, knowing it might be the last one to cross his lips for a long, long time.

Another little vignette to add to my growing bag of goodies.

Posted in Fiction, Writing | 1 Comment

2100

This is it, post number 2100. Okay, now that the celebration is over, let me get right to the work at hand.

Salt and sugar look damn near identical. I know this for many reasons, but let me recount the most recent event that confirms the fact. A couple of days ago, as I prepared to brine a pork tenderloin that I planned to smoke the following day, I placed a canister of sugar on the counter and opened it (the brine recipe I use for pork tenderloin uses sugar, salt, pork rub, and a bay leaf in two cups of water). Then, I took a box of Kosher salt down from a shelf and placed it next to the sugar. Between them sat the pot in which I would prepare the brine. I dipped a measuring cup into the sugar, pulled the full cup from the canister, and emptied it into the pot. Next, I poured a cup of Kosher salt into the same measuring cup and emptied it into the canister from which I had just taken a cup of sugar. Instantly, but before I could stop my hand from doing the deed, I realized what I had done. I attempted to retrieve all the salt I had dumped into the canister but, you know, sugar and salt look quite a lot alike. The next day, I mentioned to my wife what I had done. She tested the sugar for salt flavor and found that, indeed, sufficient salt remained in the sugar canister to warrant discarding all the remaining sugar.

I washed and dried the empty sugar canister and, after my wife purchased more sugar, I refilled it. The lesson I learned is this: close the sugar canister immediately after retrieving the needed sugar.

The following morning, I smoked the pork loin. We ate a bit of it for dinner that night; it was good.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

It Sounds Like Hope and I Think It Is

I spent the day in ventilation mode. Opening up my closed mind to ideas I’d rather not have entertained. That’s not a bad use of the clock that’s working hard to reach midnight. Listening to points of view that differ from one’s own is a monstrously freeing and frightening experience. Certainty, in such situations, becomes questionable. Madness becomes legitimate sorrow. Rage becomes tolerable, but only behind a cage built of hardware cloth and distance. Even people whose motives are dark and demonic and whose goals are fraught with poisonous outcomes merit examination by unbiased observers with sharp pencils and open minds.

I am so sick of darkness I could scream. And the scream, of course, would be my own voice directed at myself. For I am the purveyor of darkness. That is an ugly burden to bear, but it’s factual. Tomorrow will be a different day. Tomorrow, I will begin to wash the contents of the cesspool down the mountain. They may flood highways below me, but they won’t sully the air I breathe and the wishes I hold more dear than my life and the lives of those I love.

Together, the decent among us can reconstruct cathedrals to honesty and decency and honor appreciation for our differences and love for diversity. We’re in a post-apocalyptic world; we must behave as if the future depends on it because, most surely, it does.

Posted in Hope | Leave a comment

Bad Behavior

Molly was an impossible leprechaun. Impossible because, as we all know, leprechauns are delightful, mischievous little beings whose behavior on their worst days brings smiles to our faces and songs to our hearts. But Molly was different. She was, for one, female. Leprechauns portrayed in literature and stories are almost entirely (and quite possibly always) male. And, though she cobbled shoes, she loathed her job because it entailed working with her nose in footwear that reeked of sweaty, unwashed feet. She eschewed the traditional green outfit, too, opting instead for cobalt blue, decorated with orange and yellow starburst designs. Perhaps most surprising of all was the pot at the end of her rainbow. Instead of gold, it was filled with dried rabbit-pancreas-parts. When asked why she loaded her pot with dried pieces of dead rabbits, Molly scowled and bared a set of sharp pointed teeth, sending the inquisitor away in terror.

Jim Dandy, a carnival barker turned real estate broker, came upon Molly one hot November afternoon. He asked her to repair his obscenely expensive ostrich cowboy boots. Molly flashed with anger. She opened her impossible leprechaun mouth and, with her razor-sharp teeth, seized Jim Dandy’s left arm just below the elbow. Molly shook her head side-to-side in a frenzy, the way dogs do when trying to wrest a rope from their masters’ grips. The motion of her head, coupled with the sharpness of her teeth, had the effect of tearing Jim Dandy’s lower arm from his body.

Now, all of this took place in a crowded public park in Berlin, not the kind of place one normally encounters leprechauns. Fortunately for Jim Dandy, a German civil servant named Gunther Schubert sprung into action, slapping Molly hard with his right hand, sending her flying backward. Gunther grabbed Jim Dandy’s right arm with one hand and the bottom portion of Jim’s left arm with the other and rushed to the DRK Kliniken Berlin, where orthopaedic surgery is as common as Berliner kartoffelsuppe mit knacker.

“That is impossible,” the surgeon shouted, as Gunther told him the story of Jim Dandy’s leprechaun attack and Gunther’s heroic intervention.

“That is impossible! That is impossible! That is impossible!”

Jim Dandy heard the surgeon’s repetitive shouts for what seemed like an eternity. But, finally, Jim awoke from the dream in a state of confusion. Covered in sweat and panting like a dog in a hot car, Jim pondered what he had seen and heard. He swung his legs off the side of the bed, slid his feet into his slippers, and stood up. He turned to look at the cage in the corner. She was still there. Molly, his rainbow rabbit, sat munching on a carrot. The German potato salad Jim had placed in the cage the night before remained untouched. The dye Jim had used to color Molly to go with his Halloween costume had faded considerably from her white fur, but the starbursts remained visible against a dull blue background. Next to her cage, Jim’s ostrich boots, worn and bedraggled, seemed out of place.

Molly looked up at Jim. He would have sworn she smiled at him, revealing teeth like razors. In her eyes, Jim thought he saw rage.

Posted in Absurdist Fantasy | Leave a comment

Something to Occupy My Fragile Mental State

20161115_203241“Senator, I have maniacal plans for after the revolution. And you will play a significant and deeply crimson part in them; your crimson splash will be an especially welcome sight to the people you injured with your policies and your greed. I expect you will be surprised to see the brigade pass beneath your windows, but even more shocking will be the pitchforks and razor-sharp machetes. Be forewarned, mi amigo, Desiderata and his minions will cause you struggle and strife and, ultimately, will extract the final price for your arrogant display of sociopathy.”

So said the note attached to the missive sent by Express Mail to Senator Bobolink Trazsmucker a week after the fated election. The message, mailed from New Port Richey, Florida, was difficult to decipher. Megan Carmunkle, Trazsmucker’s chief of staff, wrote it off as a prank. But Senator Trazsmucker was terrified. So terrified, in fact, that he sent Governor Rectomscott this message:

“Governor, I believe my life has been threatened. Please do what you can to afford police protection to my family and me.”

Rectomscott responded to the plea with a message of his own: “Senator Trazsmucker, your request will be handled in the order in which it was received. Please be patient while the State of Florida responds to literally tens of millions of citizen questions posed long before you had reason to ask yours and well before you and your wife were married and, later, divorced. Actually, the questions began the moment you were born. The first question was, ‘why’ and we have yet to answer it.”

Just as Trazsmucker was about to dash off his enraged response, a red-hot branding iron, thrust upon the top of his bald scalp, seared the following message into the crown of his head: Live, from New Port Richey, it’s your worst nightmare.

[Author’s note: Yes, I realize some of you might think I’m crazy. And you may be right. I may be crazy. But it just may be a lunatic you’re looking for. ;-)]

Posted in Absurdist Fantasy, Writing | Leave a comment

Characterization

I had a conversation with a friend yesterday morning, over coffee, during which we discussed writing. During the course of the discussion, she mentioned someone with a military history, a person who served as the inspiration for a story she wrote. That comment, in turn, reminded me that I’ve been thinking of writing a story based on a the experiences of a person, with a military connection, who I’ve watched evolve, online, for several years. I got excited about the idea again. But later I began to question all the other stories about which I was “all fired up,” only to write and never finish them or finish them and wonder why I did. And then, it occurred to me; I have to know my characters’ motivations, inside out, in order to develop a plot sufficient to warrant keeping my attention, much less a reader’s attention. So, I’m going to ascribe a lot of attributes, including personal history, to some of my favorite characters, people I’ve written into being in stories and vignettes. And I’ll see if some of them come to life in ways that suggest intriguing plots that allow their personalities to come out and carry me, and prospective readers, to places we want to go.

Posted in Writing | Leave a comment