More Justice

The announcements have become routine: someone convicted long ago for murder exonerated on the basis of DNA evidence or some other incontrovertible proof that the conviction was fraudulently obtained. The latest I’ve heard about involves two men who were falsely convicted of murdering one of the convicted men’s three family members. And the conviction was based, in part, on one of the men, a frightened teen at the time, being bullied into confessing to the crime.

Fortunately, these two men were not sentenced to die for their “crimes.” Had that been the case, the wrong that was done might have been impossible to reverse.  Fortunately, for these two men, they only had to spend twenty-two years behind bars for a crime they did not commit.  Had they been sentenced to die, it’s very possible the sentence would have been carried out within twenty-two years of their convictions.

If this sort of thing were exceedingly rare, it would be a travesty.  But it’s not particularly rare.  According to The Innocence Project, which tracks such information, there have been 312 post-conviction DNA exonerations nationwide in the USA. And that’s solely exonerations based on DNA evidence; I imagine there have been plenty of exonerations based on other evidence coming to light, as well, though that’s admittedly speculation.  It’s not just a travesty; it’s a societally-condoned travesty.

There are plenty of cases in Texas in which convictions have been overturned due to DNA evidence.  But that’s not all.  There are cases in which prosecutorial misconduct, coupled with just plain bad luck, played a part.  I just read about one such case that was the subject of a 48 Hours Mystery program. on television.

People who commit horrible crimes should be punished for those crimes.  But, because our justice system and humans, in general, are fallible, I no longer believe we should ever risk putting the wrong person to death.  Lock them away, but give ourselves, and them, the opportunity to correct our mistakes.  And prosecute prosecutors who fabricate evidence or hide it from defense attorneys.  Our society should not be one in which our objective is to kill those who kill; our society should be one in which our objective to protect people through valid and “just” use of the  justice system.

I have read so many cases in which innocent people are caught up in the justice system with no way out.  Generally, these are poor people who have few resources, people who are easy targets when a prosecutor needs a “win.”  That’s just wrong.  Absolutely wrong.

Posted in Justice | Leave a comment

February 9: Thoughts for the Day

“Few will have the greatness to bend history itself, but each of us can work to change a small portion of events. It is from numberless diverse acts of courage and belief that human history is shaped. Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring those ripples build a current which can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance.”
~ Robert F. Kennedy

Posted in Thoughts For the Day | 2 Comments

DiDi’s

Yesterday, my favorite wife and I decided to splurge…instead of eating soup at home, we went out for lunch at a place newly re-christened as DiDi’s.  It had been called Abuela’s Kitchen, but a woman who served us (I assume she is the owner) said the corporate powers behind Abuelo’s objected and insisted that the tiny place change its name. I’m sure the corporate behemoth, whose chain restaurants litter the landscape in Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri, Arkansas, Tennessee, Florida, Indiana, etc., etc. was terribly afraid a tiny mom & pop restaurant would badly damage its identity. Never mind the fact that, in English, the little place would be called Grandmother’s Kitchen and the corporate beast would be called Grandfather’s (no “kitchen). Anyway, I’m not here to write about a miserable corporate scumbag, I am here to write about lunch.

DiDi’s will introduce a new menu next week, but we got a little peek at it while we had lunch yesterday.  It looks good.  The food is primarily southern Mexican, but there are a few Peruvian dishes on the menu, as well, courtesy of a daughter-in-law who is from Peru. Though this time I had the bistec ranchero (the sauce for which was out of this world!), next time I may try a Peruvian dish.  They have at least a couple of Peruvian ceviches on the menu and there may be a few other Peruvian dishes…we were only able to glance at the new menu for a few moments and they don’t yet have a paper version “to go.”

So far, I haven’t found a website, nor much in the way of social media coverage.  I hope the place survives.  They had only been open two months as Abuela’s Kitchen when the corporate lawyers swooped in to force the expense of an identity makeover.  It’s too bad they didn’t  have the ability to fight the bullying; I suspect they would have won.  I found a couple of other Abuela’s Kitchens in other states, including at least one in Florida, where Abuelo’s supposedly has locations (the corporate website is a piece of trash, in my opinion, when it comes to finding their locations, though…evidence of some ineptitude hidden behind the flashy corporate design).  Hey, I said I wasn’t here to write about a miserable corporate scumbag…and I won’t.

The woman who served us said they will be having a grand re-opening soon, to promote their new name.  She took my phone number and said they will call us with an invitation.

I will go; tiny restaurants under attack by giants deserve all the help they can get, especially when the food is good, fresh, and made by the owner.  Go there.  19177 Preston Road, Dallas.

Posted in Food, Justice | 8 Comments

February 8: Thoughts for the Day

My time alone with my thoughts is precious.  My time with my wife is precious.  My time with my family, my brothers and sister and my sisters-in-law and nieces and nephews is precious.  Every moment is precious. Today, I am grateful to have moments.  All moments.

Posted in Thoughts For the Day | 2 Comments

Fifteen Years On

When I read a poignant rumination on what it’s like to be 45 years old, I found myself thinking back fifteen years to the time I was forty-five.  I tried to recall how I felt, what I thought I had learned, and how I envisioned the future.  My time as a forty-five-year-old man was different from Emily Mendell’s time as a forty-five year-old woman.  I was not as mature then as she is now.  I had not learned life’s lessons as well.  At forty-five, I was still striving to achieve things I’ve since realized were not particularly important.

On the one hand, I wish I’d had the maturity and self-knowledge to have known, then, what I would learn about myself in the succeeding years.  But on the other, I’m glad to have had the experience of running headlong into epiphany and epiphany, realizing time and time again how very fortunate I am.

Had I known then what I know now, I might have retired from my first career as association executive and business owner earlier than I did (at 58), but if I had done that, I would have been forced to move immediately to something else to put food on the table. And I might not made some of the decisions that enabled me to retire a bit early.

I hope the next fifteen years prove as insightful and as eye-opening as the last fifteen.  And I hope they are as good to me and my wife as these last fifteen have been.  We’re about to embark on a new adventure that may see me starting a new business (or maybe not), that may have us wandering around the country more (probably), and that has the potential of being…of continuing to be…very, very happy.  At this very moment, I am decidedly happy about life.  I know there will be obstacles, road-bumps, annoyances, and the like, but they’re all part of the process of enjoyment…without them, I might not appreciate their absence as much after I’ve experienced them!

Posted in Happiness, Philosophy, Wisdom | Leave a comment

February 7: Thoughts for the Day

Today is Friday, the end of a work-week for many.  This week is a bit unusual, inasmuch as it is the end of the first work week in February, which happens only once a year.

Wouldn’t it be refreshing to look at every week as an unusual, celebratory week?  There’s nothing stopping us from taking that perspective. Though I am not engaged in the work-week in the same way I once was, I have work to do. And this is the end of the traditional work-week.

If I choose to take the perspective that this week’s celebrations are precursors to celebrations every week, I can make every week just as festive and full of energy and delight.

I choose to take that perspective!

Posted in Thoughts For the Day | 2 Comments

Wisdom

If it were possible to successfully impart to young people the wisdom that comes with age, people in their middle age and older would be far happier.  Unfortunately, the understanding of life that accompanies age and experience comes only through…age and experience.  It does not come from hearing the sage advice of someone who’s been there, done that. Maybe listening to the advice of elders helps prepare the mind to accept wisdom, but learning life is not like learning arithmetic.

When I see young people make mistakes I made many years ago, I wish I could help them understand, today, what they will understand twenty years hence.  But, then, I realize I could never have learned,  in the abstract, much of what I now know; it had to come through experience. Wisdom is far harder to acquire than knowledge.  It takes more time and more pain.

Posted in Wisdom | 2 Comments

February 6: Thoughts for the Day

Today, I’m thinking of the aphorism attributed to Lord John Emerich Edward Dalberg Acton:

Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”

While I agree, on principle, there are days I think I would greatly appreciate being absolutely corrupt.

Posted in Thoughts For the Day | Leave a comment

Trashy

Yesterday was “trash day.” That’s the weekly ritual of scrambling to empty the kitchen and bathroom and miscellaneous other trash into the big, grey trash bin provided by the city.  Trash day coincides with “recycling day,” which involves depositing into the big blue bin provided by the city any remaining glass and plastic and metal and paper recyclables that haven’t already made their way to it.

The size and weight of the trash in the grey bin has, fortunately, shrunk considerably since the city began collecting virtually all recyclable materials.  We have very little trash these days. But we have trash and we expect our taxes to be used to appropriately dispose of said trash.

But for reasons unknown, our big grey trash bin was left untouched in the alley yesterday. The big grey bins left out by our neighbors were emptied into the monstrous trucks that swallow the contents of those bins, but ours was ignored, leaving our trash bin, alone, in the alley.  Our bin included freshly-deposited chicken carcasses, which had been stored in sacked marked “trash” in the freezer, to begin the process of odorizing the neighborhood. Fortunately, the weather was quite cool and turned sharply colder overnight, so the brakes have been applied to odor creation.  But, unless the trash truck returns to fetch its forgotten cargo, there will be an unwelcome smellfest a-comin’ in the near-term.

My wife called the city to complain that we were left out, ignored, and left to our own trashy devices; she was told they would send someone out within 24 hours to collect the forgotten treasure.

The full-to-overflowing recycling bin was emptied as normal.  I returned it to its place inside the garage, where it can accept all the paper and plastic and metal and glass we throw its way.  But the trash bin remains, alone, on the edge of the alley, hoping someone will come to the rescue, so it can return to its proper place next to the fence gate.

I am fortunate to be able to consider this little oversight something of significance.  Most of the people on the planet, I suspect, have far, far more onerous things to occupy their minds.

Posted in Government | 2 Comments

February 5: Thoughts for the Day

It’s hard to stay hopeful and optimistic, but if the easy alternative is to be a despondent pessimist, I’d better put my shoulder to the wheel.

Posted in Thoughts For the Day | 1 Comment

February 4: Thoughts for the Day

Forty years ago today, Patty Hearst was kidnapped in Berkeley, California by the Symbionese Liberation Army and then, not long thereafter, she joined the organization. The world has changed a lot since then. I still wonder whether her conversion was a classic example of Stockholm Syndrome or something entirely different.  I remember the way many people judged her without having any knowledge of what she might have endured. In that sense, the world hasn’t changed much.

Posted in Thoughts For the Day | 2 Comments

Compassion…hmmm

Yesterday afternoon, I read many reactions to the death of Philip Seymour Hoffman.  They ranged from expressions of loss and grief to attacks on the character and intelligence of anyone who dies of a drug overdose.

One comment said simply, “R.I.P. Another great goes too soon.”  Another one said, “It’s not sad or tragic when someone dies from a drug overdose. it’s stupidity.”  The first comment was respectful and suggested the death was tragic; the latter suggested it was a deserved punishment for ‘stupidity.’

I’m not even sure what my reaction was, other than surprise.  I’ve only seen a few of the films in which Philip Seymour Hoffman starred and I did not know much about him, personally.  I did not know until reading news of his death that he had struggled with addiction in his youth, nor that he had checked into a rehab program last year after relapsing into drug use.  Both his early struggles with drugs and his relapse may have been big news, but I try not to pay attention to celebrity news; I have an almost pathological need to avoid getting on the “groupie train.”

Regardless of my distaste for celebrity worship, though, I know I did not feel anger or disdain for him.  When I learned of his death, I did not judge him any less of a man because drugs took his life.  But when I read the condemnations, the attacks on his intelligence, and the snarky comments about wealthy actors thinking they are beyond the reach of the negative effects of drugs, I felt anger at the people who posted those virulent attacks on a dead man.

Who can possibly know the darkness each of us may hide within us?  Who can know the pain or the fear or the anger inside that might cause someone to escape with drugs or alcohol?  That is not to say that I condone it, only that I think being judgmental overlooks the intricacies of reality.

I am sorry Philip Seymour Hoffman died; whether a drug overdose or natural causes, his death robbed us of a talented actor and it robbed his family and friends of someone they loved. It’s a heartless-son-of-a-bitch who can attack him for his mistakes and imply he had it coming.  That attitude suggests, to me, the person who holds it needs to take a long, hard look inward and do a bit of self-assessment…and self-judging.

 

Posted in Death, Film, Philosophy | 12 Comments

February 3: Thoughts for the Day

I used to think a “curmudgeonly” demeanor was sort of cool, even in myself.  Now, I wonder why I saw things that way.  And I wonder if, sometimes, I still do. Today, at least, when I encounter a person who has that demeanor, I feel sad; I get the sense the person is reacting badly to his or her own sense of shame or inadequacy. It makes me wish I could do something or say something to make it better.

Posted in Thoughts For the Day | Leave a comment

Ode to Chorizo…and so forth

I cannot help myself.  I love Mexican chorizo.  There’s something about the sharp, vinegar flavor of the stuff that I find immensely appealing.  When I learned, years ago, that the ingredients of commercial chorizo often include pig salivary glands, lymph nodes, fat, cheeks, etc., I was not put off by it; I figured if I’ve eaten it for years and didn’t gag or die, it was all right.  I loved the stuff.  I ate it with some regularity and enjoyed it.

That having been said, my wife long ago decreed that our household would devote at least some effort to reducing the intake of fat, so it became very rare for me to have occasion to have “natural” Mexican chorizo in my house.  Instead of the pork-based stuff, we began to buy chorizo made of ground chicken at our local Sprout’s market.  It was tasty, but not nearly as good as the real thing.

Then, later, when we went beyond reducing fat and started reducing the intake of meat, we tried a soy-based chorizo, sold by Trade Joe’s.  I was surprised at how good the stuff was, and cheap!  I didn’t bother making note of the brand because I figured Trader Joe’s would stock the stuff (the only meatless chorizo on the shelf when I bought it).  But when I returned, it was not there.  I asked the stocking staff; it was out of stock…maybe it will be back in stock soon.  Next trip: “we’ve been unable to get more stock from the supplier; we’ll probably get some more soon or we’ll go with another supplier.”

Next trip.  Nothing.  And the next trip. And the next one. Damn!

On a later trip to Supermercado El Rancho, I was surprised to see soy-based chorizo in the butcher section, sold in bulk!  Wonderful, I thought, surely they wouldn’t sell crap here! So I bought some.  It was the most disgusting swill I’ve ever put in my mouth; I bought  a pound and threw away three-quarters of a pound…it was offensive in the extreme.

And then, as we were wandering Whole Foods Market a week or so ago, I saw it: Organic Soyrizo Meatless Soy Chorizo.  I bought some, a 12-ounce package, consisting of two links of soy chorizo sealed in plastic casings.  We’ve had it twice now; it is…not bad.  But not great.  But better by far than El Rancho’s version.

But, oh, how I long for a breakfast taco made with real, fatty, Mexican chorizo, oozing bright orange-red juices that stain my fingers.  I really want to smell that pungent, devilishly good Mexican chorizo that taught me to enjoy pig parts that so many people find offensive.

The only legitimate way to do that, though, is to steal away to a down-and-dirty taqueria and order my favorite tacos: chorizo, barbacoa, pastor, and lengua. Is it legitimate to “steal away” to do this?  I don’t know; I think it is.  Look it up.

Posted in Food | 3 Comments

February 2: Thoughts for the Day

“Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.”  One’s judgment of what constitutes beauty says a great deal about the person who makes the judgment.

Posted in Thoughts For the Day | Leave a comment

February 1: Thoughts for the Day

I read recently of advice a father gave his son, who was facing prison if he did not change his life.  The advice was, essentially, to calm down and to focus on the moment. And the way to do that: count every breath, every inhalation and exhalation, for a while until the fury disappears.  According to the article, it worked.

Posted in Thoughts For the Day | 1 Comment

Musings on Cars

The Camry’s suspension issue finally has been resolved.  We’ve spent far too much time and far too much money on it, but it appears the problem is now part of history.  The source of the annoying “clunk” I heard and felt over even the slightest bump was not entirely the struts (which now, again, are new), nor was it the lower control arm bushings (which did not get replaced); no, the noise and attendant thud arose from bad front stabilizer links.  Whatever the hell those are.  Regardless, after another $370 thrown at the monster, it’s gone.  Only two years after the problem began.

In spite of the fact that we’ve probably spent far more on the car than should have been necessary and in spite of the fact that I was ready to throw in the towel, I’m glad we didn’t sell it.  I figure I’ve invested $3,000 or more in the past two years to get the problem fixed, but I would have spent far more to get a replacement vehicle.  And, although the 2002 Camry’s exterior design is rather homely, it is comfortable, drives reasonably well, and only has 108,000 miles on it…or is it 105,000…so it should have at least another 100,000 left in it.  It won’t be a cheap 100,000.  I accept the fact that maintenance, such as for brakes, the next new timing belt, etc., etc. commands high prices.  But, still, it’s cheaper than a replacement vehicle.  At 12 years old and counting, the Camry is relatively young.

Even though we’ve spent more on the Camry than we planned, we’ll go ahead and get another car in the not-too-distant future and make the Camry the “second” car.  Even though it will be “number two,” we’ll go ahead and invest yet a bit more to fix up an issue or two, most notably a scratch in the windshield that was caused by sand under the wiper blades a few years ago.  We’ll get the windshield replaced (or, if the scratches can be buffed out, we’ll just have it repaired) on Saturday.  And we’ll replace the front headlight assemblies which have grown awfully cloudy and no longer respond sufficiently well to be “buffed” to clarity. Once those additional investments are made, it will be almost like new; just 12 years old.

We’ve discovered there’s enough of a demand to be two people in two places at the same time that another car, though not an absolute necessity, is a reasonably justifiable luxury.  We’ll probably hold off on that, though, until we move.  So we’ll have plenty of time to decide what kind of vehicle best fits our needs.  In an ideal world, I’d find a new type of convertible, a vehicle that converts from a gas-sipping pickup with a big bed to a small, easily maneuverable sedan for my wife.  Our technology has not evolved so far.  Too bad.

Posted in Cars | 2 Comments

January 31: Thoughts for the Day

The solitude of an early morning appeals to me.  Perhaps solitude, alone, appeals to me. But the mix of solitude and an early morning is food for my soul.  I love the time before the sun shoves the darkness into the corners of drawers and gives me just a hint of what’s to be.  Early, pre-light morning and I have an intimate relationship that goes deep. 

Early morning and me.  We are alike in so many ways.  We are more private than we admit.  We have no secrets, but we don’t tell all without a reason. We find comfort in one another’s company.  Our love is beyond words.

[I wrote this on April 23, 2011.  It’s similar to what I wrote on January 11, 2014, but I think this is a more substantive and more personal way of saying what I felt.  So here is another thought for the day on a topic that’s clearly near and dear to my heart.]
Posted in Thoughts For the Day | Leave a comment

January 30: Thoughts for the Day

About three years ago, a friend shared with me that, each year on the anniversary of her father’s death, she burns a yahrzeit candle. She said, “It’s a Jewish tradition to mark the day with a candle that burns for 24 hours. I watched my father burn a candle every year for his mother, the candle light flickering on the walls at night. Now it flickers for him.” There is something to be said for such a powerful tradition.

Posted in Thoughts For the Day | 7 Comments

Ephemeral Art

Art of Andre Amador, from his website.

I have to admit it; Facebook can at times be entertaining and educational.  This morning, for example, I glanced at a link shared by a friend, whose comment about the link was “Wow!”  And it was.  After exploring the link,  I agreed with her.  I found myself fascinated by the work of an artist, Andres Amador, whose primary “canvas” is the beach at low tide.  The creativity necessary to produce his art is, truly, amazing.  In viewing his Facebook page and his website, it occurred to me how completely wrapped up in enjoying life this guy is; he creates for the sake of creating and he enjoys beauty for just as long as it exists, then goes on to something else just as beautiful.

Posted in Art | 2 Comments

January 29: Thoughts for the Day

It is important, I think, to give people the benefit of the doubt; look for the good lurking beneath the sinister cover, as it were.  Too often, the State is complicit in wrecking lives when those lives might have been put back on course with the right intervention.  By the same token, we must not allow ourselves to be used by bad people aiming to take advantage of our soft hearts. We must discern the downtrodden from the dangerously deviant and act accordingly.

Posted in Thoughts For the Day | 2 Comments

Polishing the Shell

Photo from HRCR website

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A Tribute to Pete Seeger

The saddest thing is not wanting what the next man has.
The saddest thing is wanting to be who the next man is,
leaving the shell of oneself, cracked and frayed and forgotten,
to languish in the dustbin, buried under withered wishes.

I see those people, wishing to be someone else, hoping for a miracle.
We are those people. We cling to another man’s fortunes like a
sailor grasps the waves, unable to hold on to anything but the anchor,
helplessly following it to the boneyard far beneath the surface.

Once, we ached to burst forth from our polished shells,
investing passion and effort and time, striving for potential.
Somewhere along the way we allowed that promise to become
too little, to dull alongside the brilliance of the man next door.

We no longer compared ourselves to the man in the mirror
but to the man through the window in the house down the street,
the man with the money and the debt and the dinner in Paris.
We fell through the cracks in our own gritty shells.

Holding ourselves to low standards, we weigh the emptiness
of greed against the bedrock of compassion, using broken scales.
The shabby impermanence of wealth permeates our culture,
starving generation after generation who hunger for thought.

I remember when we were motivated by the moon and by Mars,
when the impossible was just an obstacle away from reality.
That was a time in which we made hard choices among priorities,
sacrificing ourselves to our futures, buying hope for our children.

Somewhere, the hope went awry, shifting from tomorrow to today,
changing from big to small, from then to now, from we to I.
Hope changed, from dreams to wishes and from needs to wants.
And, now, we anguish not for a new meaning, but a new car.

But I see the signs and feel the heat of embers growing in the dust.
When we mourn old Pete Seeger, we acknowledge what we’ve lost,
there’s a hole in our conscience where his songs used to rest,
and the worship of wealth is being be put to old Pete’s test.

Now’s the time to bring it out, brush the cobwebs from our minds,
to call up the oldest memories and to recall the fondest times.
Now’s the time to do the things Pete’s songs would always tell,
time to work again, so very hard, at polishing the shell.

Posted in Poetry | 5 Comments

January 28: Thoughts for the Day

Dis-moi ce que tu manges, je te dirai ce que tu es.
~Anthelme Brillat-Savarin~
Physiologie du Gout, ou Meditations de Gastronomie Transcendante, 1826

This translates, roughly, into “Tell me what you eat and I will tell you what you are.”

Today, we say “You are what you eat.”  And you are.  And I am.  And I should always remember that.

Posted in Thoughts For the Day | 3 Comments

January 27: Thoughts for the Day

When I look in the mirror, if I see no reflection,
just a smudge where my heart used to be,
it’s time to consider just which way I’m heading
and it’s time to look closer, to try harder to see.

There’s still time to recover, still time to return,
to become the man who was there from the start.
Hard work and attention, compassion and hope,
are all that I need to recover my heart.

Posted in Thoughts For the Day | Leave a comment

Nudity

I would give credit for this, but it’s so ubiquitous online that I don’t know the original source.

I hope you won’t think the lesser of me for it, but I am here to admit that I sometimes think about nudity and wish there were more of it.  Not nudity in the sense of titillation or arousal, just…nudity.  And I wonder what the hell is wrong with nudity for the sake of nudity; nudity for the sake of shedding the constraints of clothing?  I’m not brave enough to assert my right to walk naked into the grocery store, but I am brave enough to call into question the legitimacy of the social fear of, and reaction to, nudity.

This article is what brought the issue to my mind today.  The writer wears the robes (excuse the pun) of reason confronting irrationality, but I think she limits her criticism of constraints against nudity by restricting her arguments to issues with female nudity and further limiting it to exposure of female breasts. I take the issue beyond control and misogyny; I take it to this: what is fundamentally wrong with allowing the human body to be in full view, in all its glory, any time?

Some people might think I’m joking about this.  I am dead serious.  I just do not understand humans’ apparent fear of nudity or, if it’s not fear, our tendency to equate nudity with immorality (which, in my view, is yet another perspective, in this case, based in fear).

It’s hard to have a serious conversation around this subject; people tend to become teenagers when the topic is raised, laughing and behaving as if the subject is “naughty” and deserving of ridicule or worse.  I just don’t get it; why are we so averse to allowing one another to shed clothing without reacting with either terror or lust?

And, of course, I’ve heard comments to the effect that “I don’t want to see the naked bodies of a bunch of overweight old men…”  To that, I respond, “I don’t particularly want to see a bunch of sleek young studs who make me look like an overweight old man, either, but what you gonna do?”  Who cares whether people “want” to see nudity?  Where do we draw the line?  Do we restrict the public display of elbows or kneecaps or ankles or a midriff?  This stuff drives me more than a little nuts.

I remember a time last summer when the weather was particularly unpleasant…hot, humid, and generally not comfortable.  I was wearing a t-shirt and gym shorts and flip-flops, but still felt hot and uncomfortable.  I mentioned to my wife my frustration that I couldn’t feel free to just remove the few bits of clothing I was wearing and sit out on the lawn sipping a beer.  Had I done that, I might have been attacked by angry neighbors; at the very least, they would have called the police and I would have been dragged away from my house and arrested for public indecency.  Indecency?!  Indecency?!  What the hell?!

I’ve never been around nudists, to my knowledge, but I think I understand their perspective on at least one little part of life, the freedom to just be free.  Society has, for a very, very long time, defined the human form as something ugly that must be hidden or, alternatively, something sexual that must be covered to protect us from wanton sexual attacks, I suppose.  Why did those perspectives arise?

I have absolutely nothing against clothing and, in fact, I am pretty sure I’d continue to wear clothes almost all the time, regardless of whether nudity were “permissible.” But I’d feel like I were living among more intelligent beings if the prohibitions against public nudity were to disappear.

Any thoughts on this?

Posted in Nudity | 3 Comments