Standish

Standish Cole, watching the morning sky as pale light blotted the horizon, hoped for signs of warmth and a day dry enough to take his tractor into the fields. If he couldn’t get into the fields today, the crops would be lost. Along with them, his hopes of making the payments on the land and the tractor would be crushed. Never before had he felt so utterly at the mercy of the weather. Even after the floods two years earlier, when the water took his crops and his wife, he was confident he would prevail and rebuild his farm and his life. This was different. His little remaining confidence felt fragile, like a paper-thin layer of ice on a frozen pond; a beetle could walk across it, but if a mouse were to make the mistake of testing its strength, the creature would drown.

Until recently, Standish refused to allow his mind to wander down paths leading to “what if” the farm failed. But the last two months had proven the power of positive thinking was myth. Too many things had gone wrong to allow himself the luxury of believing in his own capacity for overcoming adversity or his deeply religious neighbors’ admonitions.

“Everything will work out, Standish, the Lord is testing us and He will show us the way.” That was Chloe Webster, whose house burned to the ground when the candles she used for light caught the place on fire after the power was cut to her house for nonpayment.

Steven Pepperman, too, insisted the Lord worked in mysterious ways: “Standish, one day you’ll understand the Lord’s power. He will show you the way out of your darkest hours if you will only believe in Him. I believe we are being tested so that He will show Himself to you as the Almighty God.” Pepperman, too, had perished. He died in the horrific collapse of the Evangelical Redeemer of Faith Bible Church building.

As Standish stood on his porch, waiting for light, he saw a distant cloud bank illuminated by flashes of lightning, then heard the far-away rumble of thunder. He did not move a muscle; his eyes remained fixed on the section of sky where he saw the lightning. Another flash punctuated the morning, this one brighter, followed by a peal of thunder louder and deeper than the first. A third burst of light followed, yet closer, filling the dim morning sky, followed almost instantly by a crack of thunder so loud it shook the foundation of his house. Even before the sound of thunder dissipated, the jarring noise of rain hitting the tin roof sent convulsive shivers through his body.

Standish, the man who had weathered floods and the loss of his wife and who had withstood disdain for his lack of Christian belief, felt a sense of hopelessness envelop him like a choking cloud of noxious gas. He turned toward the door and then stopped and turned around again to look at the gloom.

Maybe this will blow over; just a passing shower.

But he knew this was no passing shower. This was the end. This was the ugly conclusion of a punishment he did not deserve, delivered by something he could not understand, for reasons that he did not care to know. Standish turned around again and stepped inside. He opened a drawer in the table just inside the entry, fishing around under papers and rags until he found it. The pistol he bought twenty years earlier but had never fired, not even once, was there. He opened the cylinder; the six bullets he had loaded when he bought the gun remained in place.  He drew the gun from the drawer, let out an involuntary sigh, and made his decision.

Posted in Fiction, Writing | Leave a comment

Writing Out of Fear

My limited writing of late skirts the edges of frivolity from time to time, then rushes headlong into its muck. Poor writing, they say, is better than none at all. My writing in recent weeks fits the bill of better than none. But now I wonder whether “they” are right? When all I can muster are half-hearted attempts that fall on their faces, might I better serve myself by resting my fingers and allowing my frazzled brain to relax and unwind from what feels like an unending period of angst and anger and fear?

I do not recall whether I read it, or made it up; regardless, this thought resides in my brain: Frantic irrational reactions to fear claim energy best stored for that moment when one must pounce to survive.

That idea seems rational and right at this moment. I read the stories in the news about Trump’s Russian connections and claims about his dalliances with prostitutes and a host of other potentially damning information. Along with those stories, I read frantic reactions, assertions that THIS is the smoking gun we need, THIS is enough to cause us to stop this travesty going forward, THIS better command our attention. I wish the media would simply collude in silence with reliable members of the justice community, passing on information and encouraging behind-the-scenes explorations of best courses forward. The dribbles and drabbles finding their way to the newspapers and fake news sites, which blow up simple things (thereby making everything in the news subject to accusations of “fake news”), enable Trump and his minions to use their well-polished gas-lighting techniques to confuse and obfuscate. Trump does not know how to respond to silence; he cannot understand being ignored. When he baits the media, the media should redirect its attention elsewhere. When he tweets, the media should say, “Trump tweeted…what’s news about that?” and go its way, leaving his tweets to languish in the sewer occupied by his followers.

When enough incontrovertible evidence is amassed, then the pouncing should begin in earnest. Only then. In the interim, a steady stream of citizen resistance should be used to make his way forward hard and unpleasant. The news should report on that resistance and, when the time is right, fill the airwaves and newspapers and social media with FACTS that cannot be disputed. And when Trump and friends gas-light to dispute them, the media must expose, over and over and over, the bastard’s fraudulence.

This experiment in social media governance will not end well. Whether it ends in armed insurrection or martial law or nuclear holocaust, I predict it will not end well.

Posted in Anger, Fear, Government, Politics | Leave a comment

Adrift in an Ocean of Hard Air

I think I’m turning Japanese…

“I think I’m turning Japanese, I think I’m turning Japanese, I really think so…” Those words are from the lyrics of a 1980 tune called Turning Japanese, by the Vapors. From the moment I heard that tune, as nonsensical as it was in many respects, I loved it. I do not, to this day, know why I found it so appealing, but I do. The remainder of the lyrics are not so strange. For example:

I’ve got your picture
Of me and you
You wrote “I love you”
I love you too
I sit there staring and there’s nothing else to do

Oh it’s in color
Your hair is brown
Your eyes are hazel
And soft as clouds
I often kiss you when there’s no one else around

But the lyrics seem to be from two different songs. Yet they fit together. They make an odd sort of sense of madness.

And so I wonder if my fascination with Japanese breakfasts these last twenty years or so has anything to do with my own madness? A madness born of missing opportunities like the song-writer missed his girl? This little philosophical side-trip down a rabbit warren has nothing in particular to do with this post. Or, on the contrary, it may have everything to do with it. Regardless, I will write about this morning’s breakfast with a sense of awe because, for the first time, I made it at my wife’s request! Yes, she actually asked for miso soup! That’s never happened. Heretofore, she has acquiesced to my desire for miso soup because she is a good person and tolerates a lot of strangeness in her husband. “If he wants miso soup,” I can imagine her thinking to herself, “I’ll indulge him. After all, it’s not so very bad, is it? I mean, I can tolerate it from time to time, can’t I, if only to keep him moderately and tolerably sane.

But this morning, she actually requested it. Perhaps she’s turning Japanese, too. Or, perhaps, if you eat foods you do not enjoy for long enough, they become not only palatable, but appealing. I will say this: she did not partake of the cucumbers, saying she would eat them as snacks later on (as in, ” at a time of day more appropriate for the consumption of cucumbers.” She once was that way about radishes and, to a large extent, still is; but she will eat a radish or two at breakfast these days. It’s what you’re used to.

After breakfast, as I was cleaning up the kitchen and putting food back in the refrigerator, I noticed that we have some fresh snow peas. Damn! They would have been the perfect accompaniment to my radishes and cucumbers! Curses! Maledictions! Big damns and little damns!

Were I to turn Japanese, I would have to make some significant changes in myself. First and foremost, I would have to become fluent in Japanese; essentially, it would be necessary for me to become a native speaker. Second, I would have to change my body shape (which is a work in progress) if I were to want to blend in with the population (assuming I were to go to Japan; one need not be in Japan to be Japanese, right?). And radical changes to my world-view would be required, wouldn’t they?

It’s not just Japanese that I think I’m turning. I think I’m turning Icelandic. And Nordic. And Arabic. And French. And Canadian. Wouldn’t the world be a wonderful place if each culture could retain its unique characteristics, yet embrace and value the differences in all other cultures? I’m afraid that’s a bit like wishing for eternal life or an end to world hunger. It’s not going to happen in my lifetime. (Get it?)

I am adrift this morning. I’ve written about this same tune before. Something about it has its clutches around me, keeping me floating through the air, yet inextricably tied to its claws. I am adrift in something like a sea. But this sea is invisible. The waves are dark, foreboding emotions that dash me against what looks like a shore but is, instead, a block of air as hard as a stone wall. The solution to this is, of course, music. I will visit Spotify, where I will create a playlist of tunes I wrote about last October 30; I called my post Eclectica, but I’ll call this new playlist Mourning Becomes a Mirage. And if the playlist does what I hope it will do for me, I will use its title to spur me to write something with the same title. That’s it. That’s what I’ll do this morning while I wait for HVAC repair people and the exchange, later today, of furniture. Onward in pursuit of happiness.

Posted in Just Thinking | Leave a comment

Sleeping with a Caffeine Buzz and Awakening to Brilliance

I’ve taken to drinking coffee in the evenings in recent days, something I’ve scrupulously avoided in the past for fear of caffeine-induced insomnia. I cannot honestly say whether the coffee is having any effect on my sleep patterns. Even before throwing caution to the wind by drinking a cup or two of strong black French roast in the evenings, sleeping through the night was unpredictable.  Some nights, I might lay awake for hours, without the benefit of coffee; lately, I do not know whether to blame the caffeine or my racing mind for the sleepless hours.

Today, if the gods are smiling down upon me from their perches in the mountains where decency hides, an able technician will come to our house to evaluate our HVAC system, give it a seasonal exorcism, and find and correct the problem that has on a few occasions of late caused a breaker under the house to trip, turning the system off. And if the gods continue to smile throughout the day, two men and a truck from Haverty’s will arrive to exchange three glass-top tables for three wood-top tables; the gods have sneered and snarled for weeks, announcing delay after delay in this process. Today, perhaps, the master clock of all the good times will be re-set to ensure happiness and joy henceforth. Only time will tell. I do hope today will reveal brilliance and beauty more so than days past have done. Again, only time will tell. I wish time would speak a language I understand so I can know what she is saying.

I bought lounging pants yesterday. Not the sort of pants one wears when leaving the house to visit a lounge, but pants one wears about the house when comfort is one’s primary objective. I had not intended to buy lounging pants. My objective was to buy a replacement for our recently-demented indoor-outdoor thermometer that decided it would refuse to display outdoor temperatures if they fell below forty-seven degrees. Alas, none of the indoor-outdoor thermometers we saw satisfactorily excited our neurons. But the pants! They made my neurons leap and dance and sing vaguely erotic hymns in honor of joyful comfort. The pants were cheap and will not last; the pants will last long enough, though, to improve this cold and dreary winter, at least. Considering what I’ve written lately about conspicuous consumption and minimalism, I should be ashamed of myself for buying pants. I should, in atonement, swallow a packet of treble fishhooks and dive face-first into a belching volcano. ‘Should’ and ‘will’ compete for space in my brain and my mouth, along with ‘won’t’ and ‘Calliope.’ How easily my deepest convictions can be flushed into an inconsequential sea.

In today’s mail, I received an envelope from a brother. Among other things, the envelope contained two photos of me. One, which I’ve seen recently and actually have a copy of my own, is my school picture from first grade at Menger Elementary School in Corpus Christi, Texas in the 1960-1961 class. The other is a photo in which I am standing next to my father outdoors next to a car parked on a street. Both of us are looking into the camera with expressions that I can only describe as suggesting disdain for the photographer. I have no idea how old I was at the time. It could have been while I was in college, but I think it’s more likely it was post-college. I wish I knew. I’m wishing a lot lately, am I not? Yes, I am.

Day before yesterday, I bought a new pair of earrings. They are the same style and design of the pair I’ve been wearing for the past year. But the pair I’ve been wearing are showing their age; the chrome is peeling, the underlying copper shows signs of tarnish, and the sheen is long gone. The new pair, on the other hand, fairly gleams. Light cannot settle on them, they are so reflective. So, I have one very shiny earring dangling from one ear and another one, equally as shiny, sitting patiently in a drawer, awaiting its call to action. Hmm. I just described an inanimate piece of metal as having patience. That suggests my linguistic abilities are failing. I must get to word-shaman quickly! I’ll write more when I have nothing to say.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Evidence of the Endeavor

Today is Day Eight of my effort to lose massive amounts of weight over the long haul. In my defense, I introduce into evidence two photographs, taken today, illustrating the outcome of my effort…not lost weight, but the WAY to losing it. These are not unusual meals; these are relatively typical breakfast and lunch (though, I admit I have never made these nachos in my life before today). But I do eat relatively healthy meals most of the time. I just eat more of them than I should. And I tend toward modeling gluttony. I should have put those statements in the past tense. For I am a changed man! So say I. The proof, as they say, is in the pudding. Well, I shall have no pudding, but I will deliver up an order of proof one day. And with that, I say good day to you.

Zucchini nachos with Mexican salsa, mozzerella, and pepperoni.

Poached egg, Canadian bacon, radishes, white cheddar, encacahuatado sauce (oh, you would not believe this stuff), and a few assertive drops of habanero sauce.

Posted in Food | Leave a comment

Taking Shortcuts to Mediocrity

Last night, I adapted a tried-and-true (if overly simple and insufficiently spicy) recipe for Shrimp Fra Diavolo. I adapted the recipe in several ways, the two most obvious deviations being the substitution of cod for shrimp and cauliflower for rice. Cooking cod in a skillet differs rather substantially from cooking shrimp in a skillet, so that element of recipe revisionism started the path down different-dishdom. Cod takes longer and, if not prepared properly, will fall apart. So, I patted the cod filets dry, dusted them with flour, drenched them in an egg wash, and squeezed the flour and egg coating off until just a hint of it remained. After cooking the cod for a total of around five and half minutes (compared to three for shrimp), the remainder of the recipe was as it would have been had I been cooking Shrimp Fra Diavolo. Except, of course, I did not use broccoli rabe in the dish because it was unavailable; I used frozen chopped broccoli instead. And I did not cook rice. Instead, I cauliflower, steamed with boiling water into which I had introduced a few teaspoons of lemon juice. Along the way, because I am lazy, I omitted various steps that traditional Shrimp Fra Diavolo would have included. Instead of crushed tomatoes, I used a nice squirt of Italian tomato sauce from a tube. Instead of a crushed anchovy filet, I used a squirt of anchovy paste from a tube (whose “best by” date was early 2015, but I don’t buy that nonsense meant to sell more tubes of the stuff to fearful consumers). And I omitted the white wine and basil leaves and diced onion.

In short, I pretended to make Shrimp Fra Diavolo, substituting cod for shrimp, using cauliflower instead of rice, leaving out several ingredients during the course of preparing the meal, and taking a few other shortcuts.

The end result? It wasn’t bad, not bad at all. But it did not result in the kind of meal I would have eaten had I stuck to an original recipe, followed the plan, incorporated all the commonly-used ingredients, and dedicated myself to making it “right.” Even with the substitutions, it could have been a more delightful experience, had I not taken shortcuts. But it turned out fine. We were hungry. We did not want to wait the extra time it might have taken to reach a higher rung on the gustatory ladder.  Last night’s meal was more about satisfying hunger than achieving culinary excellence. I think I married the two reasonably well; the union will not produce offspring, but it did not end in divorce.

Taking shortcuts tends not to produce great art. We rarely herald writers of formulaic mysteries as great writers. Painters who generate mass-market assembly-line copies of masterpieces fail to achieve artistic recognition. Cooks who take shortcuts to fill hungry bellies are not called culinary wizards.  Actors whose characters are wooden and two-dimensional are not awarded Oscars.

There is nothing wrong with mediocrity, if mediocrity satisfies. But we tend to pity the mediocre and, even more so, we pity the lack of dedication and drive that permit mediocrity to suffice. I want to believe such an attitude is elitist, but I can’t bring myself to do it. I think there’s something in us, at least most of us, that forces us to push on beyond mediocrity. Shortcuts are acceptable in the right circumstances, but accepting them as a way of life would be a shame.

I may try creating Cod Fra Diavolo again. Next time, though, the hunger will not reside solely in my stomach; it will sizzle in my brain. Next time, I will create a dish worthy of the energy of someone who could call himself chef.

Posted in Art, Creativity, Food, Philosophy | Leave a comment

Justification

We think the world owes us an explanation. It doesn’t. We owe it one. We owe the universe substantive  justification for why we should be allowed to remain here; an argument validating our existence. If there’s purpose, it is not some external “thing.” Purpose is something within us, something of our own making. We must, individually, defend our presence on the planet. Without vindication, we do not merit space in time and place. That could be a frightening thought in the absence of belief in oneself. Even if one possesses high self-esteem and indefatigable self-confidence, the idea that we must prove our worth in order to stake our claim to life introduces the potential for existential anxiety; as well it should.

I do not subscribe to the belief that humankind exists in homage to a purpose set forth by some higher power. We create our own purposes. When the purposes we create run counter to our own interests and the interests of the planet we occupy, bad things happen: conflicts, wars, murder, rape, misogyny, xenophobia, et al. Those result from indefensible purposes, purposes insufficient to defend our presence on the planet.

When the purposes we create parallel and support peace and harmony and, at minimum, survival in reasonable comfort for all who share our common humanity, good things happen. It seems to me that the logic of creating purposes that support such outcomes is flawless. Why, then, is it so hard for us, individually and collectively, to embrace purposes that justify our existence? Are we fighting flaws within ourselves? That, I suppose, is an unnecessary question; of course we are. The better question is this: who wins?

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

Minimal

For years, I’ve been drawn to the concept of a minimalist lifestyle.  Several years ago, I stumbled across an online video created by a young guy who designed and built tiny houses and who had created an online video series to encourage others to explore the possibilities of doing the same. He was seeking sponsors to enable him to do more videos and I found his ideas absolutely riveting.  At the time, my company was doing especially well, so I offered my company’s sponsorship. As is so often the case, I got busy and lost track of the guy, his videos, and whether my money made a difference. But I’ve always remembered how intrigued I was by his tiny houses; I remain intrigued by the things. It wasn’t just the tiny houses; it was the frame of mind they nurtured: living a minimalist lifestyle.

Though that experience happened years ago, I remain drawn to minimalism, though I certainly do not live the lifestyle. I am just as addicted to ‘stuff’ as the next guy. Perhaps the difference is that I recognize my willingness to purse ‘things’ suggests an implicit acceptance of the concept that more things should equal more happiness; that bothers me. A lot. And it has for a very long time.

From time to time, I find myself in the middle of a daydream in which my circumstances have changed and, in order to survive, I am forced to make my own way in the world without the massive amounts of luggage tying me to one place.  In my daydream, I must grow my own food, create my own shelter, solve my own problems, and think my own thoughts. It’s almost as if I were wishing for the meltdown of society, just to force me to abandon my attachment to objects that do not matter. Because, you see, without being forced, I don’t think I’ll allow myself the luxury of abandoning the useless glitter with which I surround myself. It’s embarrassing and upsetting. Rather than focus my attention on the things that really bring me joy, I willingly allow myself to care about smart phones and new furniture and the latest technology and having a closet full of clothes and all those other symptoms of greed; greed replacing humanity.

If I were a stronger person, I’d be able to just cut the cord with conspicuous consumption. I would not allow myself to be swayed by television advertisements or friends’ enthusiasm about the latest trending ‘gotta have it.’ I suppose part of it is laziness. And part of it is that my wife doesn’t necessarily share my ennui about capitalism run amok.

I have enormous admiration and respect for people who opt to pursue lifestyles that eschew luxury and consumption in favor of a more ascetic and more inner-directed world. I am not sure whether I’ve ever told anyone, except a friend from my early college years, that I really wanted, many years ago, to live the life of an ascetic. My interest was not religious in any sense but, rather, intensely personal; I wanted to know who I was. I felt that the only way I could learn who I was would be to direct my attention to my own thoughts and making my own way in the world, relying only on myself for food and shelter and rejecting overabundance. My friend and I talked for hours about such a lifestyle. He was of the same mind as I, but I think he had greater discipline and focus than I. I am not sure, but I strongly suspect that he pursued that lifestyle, at least for a time. And I suspect, if he did, he came to know who lived inside his head.

I still don’t know who I am and I’m afraid it’s too late to try to find out. If I had acted on my interest at the time, I might be the same person I am now or I might be someone different. But at least I’d know which one. I wish I knew.

Posted in Greed, Happiness, Materialism, Philosophy, Self-discipline | Leave a comment

New and Regained, 7 and Done

One week ago, I declared that I intended to document on this blog each day one new thing I learned or something that I had once known but recently recalled or re-learned. It seemed like a good idea at the time. But I have decided I have better things to do than fulfill a commitment whose genesis neither had nor has real merit. I’ve come to the conclusion that my commitment was a gimmick to force me to write something that I, or others, might find ‘illuminating.’ What made me think that would hold any appeal to anyone, least of all to me? I’m better off coming to the realization that nothing will magically transform my life or my writing.

I’ve not felt much like writing fiction of late. I don’t know why. I could hazard a hundred guesses, but none of them would hold any more substance than the next. Writing is too lonely to be satisfying right now. That’s the regained knowledge for today and the last attempt to stumble upon some magical truth that will illuminate mankind’s struggle with himself.

Posted in New and Regained Knowledge | Leave a comment

Observations on Animal Instinct

Despite its many bungling attempts to protect us (e.g.,  the Transportation Security Administration, or TSA), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) recommends an absolutely natural response if one confronts an active shooter or other such attack on one’s person (i.e., danger). DHS recommends, in order, the following responses: 1) run, 2) hide, 3) fight.

Now, consider the behavior of ‘wild animals’ when confronted with the dangers posed by the presence of humans. Yes, their reactions mimic those recommended by the DHS. The first reaction animals have to humans (which they clearly recognize as presenting danger, indicating animals often have more on the ball than do people) is to run. If they are unable to escape the human (or, for that matter, other predators), they try to hide. And if their attempts to make themselves invisible to their aggressors fail, they turn on them and fight, hard, with every tool available to them.

In most animals with whom we share this earth, these are instinctual behaviors. Yet it seems we must be taught them. Or, is it that those responses to perceived threats have been educated out of us? Are we, instead, being taught to recover what is natural in us?

It seems to me ‘Stand Your Ground’ laws are based on an unnatural premise; that we should not react naturally to danger by running away from it. Rather, these laws and other forms of socialization teach us we should overcome, dismiss, and ignore the first two natural responses to danger by accelerating our response to the third, and final, way of dealing with danger. These laws, and the people who promulgate and support them, seem to embrace a concept that relegates natural fear responses to behaviors reserved for the weak and impotent.

These thoughts of mine are just observations on animal instinct; my assessments of what I observe, attached to opinions I formed (I am quite sure) through bias. I’m in favor of knowing the realities of what I think. That’s why I am firmly in favor of the scientific method of finding answers or, in the case of my opinions and odd laws, verifying or correcting answers others have given.

Posted in Fear, Frustration, Philosophy | Leave a comment

New and Regained, 6

Today’s regained knowledge involves the power of cold temperatures. I remember, from several winters ago, the capacity weather possesses to disrupt our ability to travel. Even with a light dusting of snow—and the effect of that snow thawing under car tires and then refreezing—very hilly terrain can become virtually unmanageable in most passenger vehicles. The advice a short while ago from the management of the community in which I live—that residents stay off the roads if possible (and announcing the closure of a particularly treacherous hill)—reminded me that the capacity of humans to cope with climate is a function of past experience. I asked myself whether our community’s reaction to a light dusting of snow was indicative of our inability to function in such weather or simply our inexperience with snow and cold temperatures. It’s both, the former an artifact of the latter. That’s what I’ve learned anew this morning.

Posted in New and Regained Knowledge | Leave a comment

Satisfying Hunger with Paint

I am posting here several photos, some of which already found their way online via Facebook, that illustrate how  I satisfy my hungers by painting with food. Let me explain. Later. Look at the images and read the captions, as well as more narrative text that follows below.

Painting a low calorie lunch in early January can inspire warmth, decadence, and satiation.

Koren-Inspired Pasta-Filled Cucumber Cups

Another painted lunch. I’m feeling full just looking at it.

Christmas dinner 2016; half a roasted Cornish game hen, beans, sweet potatoes, and stuffing.

The wanna-be chef preparing Cornish game hens.

The table sign identifying the soup we took (and who made it) to the Unitarian Universalist Christmas Eve soup dinner.

Cajun shrimp and sausage over fettucine.

Brazilian style rice, tomate recheado, and shrimp moqueca

Brazilian style rice, tomate recheado, and shrimp moqueca

Miso soup, as I like it.

You noticed, didn’t you, that I wrote of satisfying my hunger(s)? Plural. I do enjoy food and I love the fact that the way it is prepared and presented can paint moods and emotions. Food can set the stage for thought and ideas; it can serve as a man’s (or woman’s) artistic medium just as surely as acrylic and oil paints and watercolors can do for painters. Unusual treatment of food, like filling cucumbers with spiced pasta, triggers creativity; not just creativity in the kitchen, but in the inner recesses of the mind. Splashes of excitement, spurred by shocked and stunned synapses encountering the unexpected, erupt from the brain, spilling into every aspect of one’s experience. Possibilities never before imagined flood the mind with energy. Hope and belief in the possibility of world peace and harmony would be nice outcomes of unusual treatments, but I’m not counting my chickens.

 

 

Yet how many chicken would I have to catch to convince me that food is the salvation of the world? If I think hard enough about it, the certainty of its holy place in life cannot be subject to question. For, without food, what would happen to the world in which we live? We would never know, because we would starve and die. So, in a very real sense, food is our salvation. On the other hand, is it possible to live without Cornish game hens? Well of course it is. So, a chicken in every pot is not the sine qua non for existence. But food, in a broader sense, is necessary for life and for art. And food ought to, by all rights, be part of art, an active participant in helping the world understand creative peacemaking and delicious joy.

Posted in Art, Food | Leave a comment

Morning Morsels: Salmon, Avocado, and Condiments

Salmon, avocado, cherry tomatoes, radishes, and a side of tomato juice.

2.24 ounces broiled Sockeye salmon (108 calories)
1/2 avocado (116 calories) [the Tajín sprinkled on top is a gimme]
2 radishes (4 calories)
2 cherry tomatoes (6 calories)
Grand Total: 272 calories (compared to earlier this week, a MONSTROUS increase in calories)

Posted in Food | 1 Comment

Controlled Food Lust

I wrote not long ago that I might start a food blog. At this moment, I doubt I will. But I may assemble all of my food posts from years past into a resource from which I write a longer blog post or, perhaps, a separate page on my website devoted exclusively to food. That I am thinking of such a thing during the early stages of Phase I of the South Beach Diet is testament to my insanity. No, not really. Actually, though I’m sticking pretty closely to my personally modified version of the South Beach Diet’s first phase for a week or two, I plan to use the diet’s philosophy to guide my eating habits and train myself to exercise self-discipline, rather than use it as a cudgel to beat myself into weight-loss. I’ve done it before and it worked quite well; I simply allowed myself to deviate from perfectly comfortable good habits, drifting into wanton gluttony.

Back to the food blog or food section of this website or whatever it may become: I find the challenge of creating tasty but healthy recipes and meal plans enticing and exciting. The idea of focusing on using readily accessible and cost-competitive alternate ingredients to make gloriously appealing and satisfying—but high-calorie, high-carb, high-fat—dishes into healthier, easy-to-make, affordable meals appeals to me. I have no interest (at least not today) in becoming a food ascetic; I want to continue to eat and enjoy food as much as I do now and have for as long as I can remember. The solution (assuming controlled gluttony is a solution) is to create satisfying dishes that remain healthy, even in “healthy” portions.

The results of my latest effort to lose weight (with the objective of fitting more comfortably into my snug clothes), now only beginning its fourth day, are impressive: I’ve lost 6.6 pounds while eating reasonably well. This first week, I’m not starving myself, though I am limiting caloric intake as well as carb intake rather dramatically. Yesterday was the first day my caloric intake exceeded one thousand calories (and only slightly). I do not plan to do that for long, as I suspect such a practice long-term would do more harm than good.

My wife was impressed (as was I, I must admit) with a dish I created a couple of days ago using frozen cauliflower, frozen spinach, canned fire-roasted tomatoes, pan-fried purple onions, store-bought curry powder, garlic salt, and a very tiny bit (less than four ounces) of lean ground meat. The recipe yielded what I intended to be two servings, with a total of 424 calories (212 per serving). As it happened, we used the leftovers (yes, there were leftovers) the next day to supplement a very low-calorie, low carb lunch. The meal was cheap, easy, filling, and healthy (save for the high levels of salt in the canned tomatoes). That’s the sort of thing I’d like to create on a regular basis. And, in fact, I’ve done that for some time. I just want and need to keep doing it and to document the recipes I create. Tasty, inexpensive, easy-to-make, healthy meals as alternatives to tasty, price-irrelevant, effort-irrelevant, not-so-healthy meals.

While the first few weeks will be alcohol-free (with an exception for an already-planned dinner party), going forward, I’ll limit myself to an occasional glass of wine. Alcohol is highly caloric and tends to accumulate around my waist. Now there’s a challenge: creating (or finding) a substitute for alcohol that’s low-cal, satisfying, and lubricates social interactions as well as booze. If I can come up with that, I’ll not only be healthy, but people will call me wealthy and wise.

Posted in Food | Leave a comment

New and Regained, 5

Snippets about Iceland. I did not know:

Iceland lays claim to the world’s oldest legislative assembly, the Alþingi (anglicized as Althingi), which was established in the year 930. The Icelandic National Parliament (Alþingi Íslendinga) is a unicameral body currently representing seven distinct legislative groups: the Independence Party, the Left-Green Movement, the Social Democratic Alliance, the Progressive Party, the Reform Party, the Bright Future, and the Pirate Party.

In 1875, fallout from the Askja volcano of devastated the Icelandic economy and caused widespread famine. Over the following twenty-five years, twenty percent of the island’s population emigrated, mostly to Canada and the US. Denmark, which had ruled Iceland for centuries, granted limited home rule in 1874 and complete independence in 1944 (Icelandic independence day is June 17, 1944).

Substantial economic growth driven primarily by the fishing industry took place in the second half of the twentieth century. The economy diversified greatly after the country joined the European Economic Area in 1994, but Iceland was hit especially hard by the global financial crisis in the years following 2008. Literacy, longevity, and social cohesion are first rate by world standards.

For reasons I can’t quite pin down, I’ve had an interest in Iceland for quite some time. This morning, I’ve delved into learning a bit more about the country that holds an inexplicable appeal for me.

 

Posted in New and Regained Knowledge | Leave a comment

Forgetting

Long swaths of my life have gone missing, experiences unremembered
in my rush to attend to the next exuberant undertaking that will join
the other forgotten ones in the chase toward the unwanted end.

Do we all fail to give sufficient attention to our own memories that we let
them slip away unrecorded, or am I alone guilty of treating life and
love and the fabric of wisdom with undue disrespect?

If I could go back in time, I’d train myself to keep and analyze a journal
of my life, a running recollection of the magnificent and the mundane that,
taken together, form the perspectives that define me.

But, absent the ability to mine that life script, I rely only on conjecture
as to the accolades and aching wounds, the life-altering experiences,
that molded me into this vessel of love and hate.

I can only wonder about what formed this urn, this hideaway in
which grace and beauty compete for space and relevance with
crudity and self-imposed disfigurement.

The lessons, too late learned, chide me for the naked hubris of
thinking I would remember every precious moment of joy and
each excruciating second of its empty absence.

Forgotten moments are like knives that cut and pierce the threads
that bind us to our humanity; lost memories rob us of the generous
spirit we long to find in ourselves.

Experiences we do not remember shaped us; if we had used
the early lessons to craft and validate the later ones, we might
have become more than egos in bags of skin.

Posted in Poetry | Leave a comment

New and Regained, 4

Andrés Segovia, the renowned Spanish classical guitarist, made his first tour of the United States in 1928. When I watched and listened to him play many years later, I did not know anything of his first tour of the U.S. so many years before I saw him. And I cannot say with even a range of years when nor where I saw him perform. I only know it must have been between 1979 and 1985, because those were the years I was employed by what was then called the National Association of Corrosion Engineers, now called NACE International—The Corrosion Society; it was during one of the organization’s annual conferences, called Corrosion/XX (XX being the last two digits of the year in which the conference was held) that I saw and heard him play. A few other staff members and I paid for tickets to see and hear the virtuoso classical guitarist.

Here’s something new I learned as I dug into Segovia’s history: he played with a combination of his fingers and fingernails, which differed from his contemporaries. Other classical guitarists of his era typically used either one or the other, but not both. But Segovia, using a combination of the two, was able to produce a wider range of tone qualities than with one or the other, alone.  Segovia died in June, 1987 at age ninety-four.

Here’s something else of which I was reminded as I tried to determine when and where I saw Segovia play: the internet may hold all of the world’s knowledge, but it hides significant parts of it. Though I have admittedly not exhausted all my internet resources, I have been unable to find a complete list of NACE’s Corrosion/XX conference dates and locations. I would have thought that would be a simple matter. But, no, not for me. Gaining some bits of knowledge requires more effort than others. I knew that. Now, I consider myself reminded.

Posted in New and Regained Knowledge | 1 Comment

New and Regained, 3

I know a little about cheese, as in I know what I like, but I’ve learned my knowledge of cheese is superficial in the extreme. I can name several cheeses off the top of my head: cheddar, Swiss, emmental, gruyere, Roquefort, parmesan, gouda, Manchego, stilton, camembert. But I had no idea a database of cheeses available online (at cheese.com) contains 1777 different cheeses. According to the online database, cheese are classified (according to one scheme) by type: fresh soft; fresh firm; soft; semi-soft; semi-hard; hard; semi-firm; and firm. I knew that experts often differentiate cheeses from one another by descriptions of their texture, but I did not know there are so many categories of texture:

  • brittle
  • buttery
  • chalky
  • chewy
  • close
  • compact
  • creamy
  • crumbly
  • crystalline
  • dense
  • dry
  • elastic
  • firm
  • flaky
  • fluffy
  • grainy
  • oily
  • open
  • runny
  • semi firm
  • smooth
  • soft
  • soft-ripened
  • spreadable
  • springy
  • sticky
  • stringy
  • supple

Inasmuch as the complexity of the numbers, types, textures, flavors, ingredients, and processes by which cheeses are made are so great, I do not expect to become a cheese expert. But I now have a sense of how much I would have to learn to earn that title.

Now that I’ve come across this tiny fragment of new knowledge, I believe I can use it either as fodder for stories I might write or, with a bit more exploration as required, as information to make my stories more life-like.

Posted in New and Regained Knowledge | Leave a comment

Handsel

“I offer you this advice as a handsel for the new year upon us: be as gentle with yourself as you are with those you love most dearly, yet measure yourself against high expectations. By so doing, you make yourself into the gift those you love truly deserve.”

With those words, Jamison Branch tipped his hat, pulled on his horse’s reins, and trotted down the path toward the road to Smithville. As Branch and  his Appaloosa disappeared in the distance, unwelcome tears welled up in Cash Gleason’s eyes. How was it, Cash wondered, that someone he’d met only a few hours earlier could have such insight into his own struggles? How could that man have seen the pain buried under the rough exterior that Cash crafted so carefully?

Cash glanced back at his wife, Emily, who stood at the doorway of the cabin watching her husband’s exchange with the man who had stopped by unexpectedly on the first day of the new year. She looked worried, he thought, but she couldn’t have heard the conversation. She couldn’t have heard him reveal how afraid he was that the coming year would present challenges he was unsure he could overcome. But Emily seemed to have a way of reading his emotions; she seemed to know him better than he knew himself.

[Yes, New Year, it’s more of the same snippet stuff.]

 

Posted in Fiction, Writing | Leave a comment

New and Regained, 2

When the skies rebel against the peace, exploding in monstrous roars of thunder and brilliant flashes of lightning, something must be done. When the heavens flush doubt and hubris and hope from the air in the fury of pounding rain, and when the ground shakes and shudders and trembles in fright at the rage of Mother Nature, something must be done.

First and foremost, because today (even though ‘today’ is an odd word to use when the time is 4:00 a.m. and daylight refuses to consider showing its face for hours) is January 2, 2017, what must be done is that I must remember to wish my friend and long-ago-former-employee, Jade Hart (with whom I have no contact since her last age-expansion experience) happy birthday. But, secondly, the tumultuous nature of this early morning calls for writing the second edition of New and Regained. Even without the riotous storms outside our windows, New and Regained would have called for attention. And thus, as we know from the wise words of Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman, “attention must be paid.”

COUNTIF Function in Excel

Today’s regained knowledge relates to the COUNTIF function in Microsoft Excel. I am sure I once knew COUNTIF like I know the back of my hand, but I’ve forgotten where I left my hand, or perhaps I’ve left my hand where I’ve forgotten it. So, today, I’ll revisit and regain that lost memory, by example.

In the following example, the function argument returns a value equal to the sum of days of the week in the range of cells from B7 to B78, the value in cell B3 is found. =COUNTIF(B7:B78,B3)

For example, if cell A1 contains the function formula, cell B3 is blank, and cells B7 to B78 contains seven instances of “Monday,” fourteen instances of “Tuesday,” eight instances of “never,” and five instances of “someday,” the numbers following the words below would appear in cell A1 if I were to type the following the words in cell B3:

Monday: 7
Tuesday: 14
Never: 8
Someday: 5

Now, whether you realize the importance of this function or not, the world would not spin properly on its axis without the truth conveyed in the COUNTIF function. While I was revisiting the goodness of COUNTIF, I encountered new information (at least it was new as far I can recall) that shocked and stunned and otherwise surprised me. And that is this:

MOD Function in Excel

The MOD function in Excel delivers the remainder of a number when divided by a divisor. For instance, MOD 3,2 returns the value of 1, which is the remainder of 3 divided by 2. I do not recall ever using the MOD function, which I learned as I was wandering the esoterica of Excel is shorthand for modulo, a mathematical term meaning “with respect to a modulus,” to which I do not believe I have had the displeasure of being exposed. Another way of expressing the term, which I find easier to understand, is this: 3 is congruent to 2, modulo 1 or 9 is congruent to 6, modulo 3.

Now, you may think these bits of regained and new knowledge are useless logs in a forest, but I assure you they are not. I am teaching myself Excel; rather, I am relearning some of the more complicated aspects of Excel I once knew and learning other aspects I never learned. But I’ve actually put both of these functions to use in a spreadsheet that determines, mathematically, whether a given year is a Leap Year (per yesterday’s post). I’m not fully “there” yet, but I’m making progress. And that’s all we can demand of ourselves, isn’t it? That we make gradual improvements in ourselves, in pursuit of becoming a person of whom we can be justly proud?

Posted in New and Regained Knowledge | Leave a comment

New and Regained, 1

This year, I intend to document—here on my blog—knowledge I gain or regain each day. That is, something new I learn or something I may once have known but have forgotten and learned anew.  With that explanation, here is my start to 2017, which is not, by the way, a Leap Year.

Leap Year
A leap year is identified according to the following guidelines:

  • The year is evenly divisible by 4;
  • The year cannot be evenly divisible by 100, unless;
  • The year is also evenly divisible by 400, in which case it is a leap year.

So, the year 2000, while it is evenly divisible by 4, should not be a Leap Year because it is evenly divisible by 100, except that, because it is evenly divisible by 400, it is a leap year.

Aside from the mathematics, Leap Years can be identified by the February calendar, which has twenty-nine days, versus the usual twenty-eight, thereby keeping the calendar in sync with the earth’s revolutions around the sun.

Posted in Leap Year, New and Regained Knowledge | Leave a comment

Prelude

We’ve reached it. The final day of 2016, the day on which we can put this year to rest and, for many of us for many good reasons, say “good riddance!” Yet, without this year, we would not have reached the cusp of another one. Without this year’s heartaches and misfortunes and grievous adversity—hallmarks of 2016—we might not have realized the gravity of circumstance. We might not have come to grips with the powerlessness with which we have faced the world’s woes, nor the potential power we can wield if enough of us opt to use it.

We’ve made horrendous mistakes, as a species, this year. We’ve allowed ourselves to be manipulated, swindled, and taken for fools. We’ve stood idly by as the social order—not just in the USA but globally—has unraveled.  But we can take comfort in the fact that we’ve been given the opportunity to learn lessons from the experiences of 2016; but only if we assert our collective wills to prevent a further disintegration of the links that bind us together. By this I do not mean accepting the horrors of a Trump presidency and “coming together” behind the wave of misogyny and racism and sexism and xenophobia that sent him to the White House. I mean we must join together in pursuit of the highest ideals that his ascendency to the highest office in the land has endangered.

I look at 2016 as a lesson. A lesson in what can happen when we allow ourselves to focus on what splits us apart. A lesson in what can happen when we refuse to accept that half the population is experiencing pain or frustration we are unwilling to understand or even acknowledge as legitimate. We spent the entire year in the USA in a rage brought about by one man’s psychotic rants that, somehow, touched a nerve with almost half the voting public. Much of the rest of the world wrestled with open wounds whose symptoms looked much like those we felt. We witnessed a global backlash against troubles brought on by inadequate responses to the horrors and dislocations of war and the realities of changing populations. As much as I remain convinced that many of the reactions to immigration and job losses and terrorism were and are based in bigotry and its cousin, fear, I think the absence of our own dedicated and effective voices of reason and reconciliation led to the divides we now are facing.

In the year ahead, it would behoove us to speak loudly and with conviction when we see actions that run counter to our principles. Yet if we scream foul at the new administration’s every utterance, others will perceive us the same way we perceive Trump: as obnoxious, uninformed crybabies who just want attention and who want things our way. Rather than focus on the harm Trump’s utterances to date, if transformed into actions, might do, I believe we ought to work to counter his potential bad acts by performing our own good ones. If we focus our attention on taking positive steps instead of negative reaction to his acts, we’ll be more effective. That is not to say we should be silent; we should not. But we should focus our energies on accomplishments rather than obstruction, whenever possible.

Obviously, my comments apply primarily to those of us in the USA. But the philosophies behind them apply globally. These are my thoughts about 2016. They seem more focused on the future than on the past; that, I think, is another lesson to take to the memory bank. I hope my words here are preludes to my thoughts and actions in 2017. And I hope they are preludes to yours, as well.  Good riddance to 2016, but thanks for the painful lessons you taught us. Now, we’ll march into 2017 and see if we learned them.

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

Free Association

Flinch. Twinge. Cringe. Sparkle. Shake. Stutter. Masticate. Articulate. Throng. Skeptic. Inclusive. Divisive. Embrace. Muscular. Delicate. Ephemeral. Taut. Soft. Massive. Maniacal. Voluptuous. Cunning. Shrink. Shirk. Study. Paternity. Modernity. Hysterical. Historical. Worship. Harsh. Death. Suicide. Completion. Solemnity. Poverty. Elemental. Vague. Crisp. Spastic. Effusive. Dull. Demonstrative. Orgasmic. Climactic. Wasted. Winded. Moribund. Bucolic. Brave. Frightened. Fabulous. Manly. Moronic. Ugly. Unmoved. Upper. Flush.

If you can solve the riddle, you deserve  my everlasting admiration. You won’t get it. Because I’m a much lesser man than I ever wished to be. But I have hope. At least a little.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Resolutions

After the near-miss accident on December 28, I sent an email to the Property Owners Association, recommending something be done about the dangerous intersection where I’ve seen two cars fly off into the ravine. I understand there have been other situations in which cars have tumbled off the road in that spot. Tonight, I got an email response back, indicating the issue would be investigated. Assuming the matter is actually explored, I feel pretty good about it. When we see problems, we ought to bring them to the attention of people who have the capacity to explore and, we hope, resolve them. Tonight, I wanted to think I was not alone in wanting to address an issue that could have catastrophic consequences if not resolved. That simple email response made me think, at least for a spell, I am joined in compassion by someone else.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Linguafile

An idea for a story came to me during a conversation with my wife yesterday. The story would have been a whimsical one in which a young boy dreams of becoming fluent in every human language and, by working hard, achieves his dream. But, generally, I do not write even whimsical stories without exploring, at least to some extent, the degree to which such whimsy is within the realm of possibility. So, when I came to realize that by one estimate, 6,909 languages are spoken worldwide, I decided the plausibility of the kid’s dream was outside the dimension of reality. Maybe, I thought to myself, I’ll one day change the dream to something more achievable and write that story. But my exploration into the number of languages spoken worldwide and the maximum number spoken by one person captured my interest and imagination.

During my little foray into linguistic research, I learned that Mandarin Chinese is the world’s most popular language, with one billion, two hundred-thirteen million speakers. I learned that a Canadian man named Powell Janulus was entered into the Guiness World Records in 1985 as the person with fluency in the most languages, having tested as fluent in forty-two languages. He is alive today (aged seventy-seven); he was forty-six when he entered the record books.  At one point, he considered himself a skilled speaker of sixty-four languages. There’s a story in that man; maybe it’s been written.

During my research I learned that, of the total number of languages spoken world-wide, around two thousand languages have fewer than one thousand speakers each. Further, I came to realize that languages and dialects within languages make difficult the task of pinning down the precise number of languages spoken. And, of course, because languages change over time, the language of one period may be vastly different from the same language in a different period. Consider, for example, a conversation between Chaucer and George Washington and George Clooney; would it be a conversation, or would every comment by any one of them be simply an utterance unfamiliar to the other two?

So, there you have it. My story idea crashed against reality. But, I have to say, many of my stories ideas are utter lunacy and reality hasn’t prevented their birth, so why does reality get to stop this train today? I don’t know; maybe I just needed an excuse not to write.

[I intended for the title to be “Linguafile” and not “Linguaphile,” in case you were wondering.]

Posted in Language, Writing | Leave a comment