Envision

Constraints exist only in one’s imagination.
Possibilities have limits only in the mind.
If a person can conceive of time travel,
he can travel forward in time, carrying
a notebook in which to record his reality.
Circumstances impose boundaries only when
we let them bind doubts to our dreams.
Stories I tell myself shape the future
in ways impossible to measure without
tools I create in my imaginations.
Even old men build bridges to infinity,
using ideas to form structures clad with words.
Accomplishments rest on visions fed by wishes.
Hope is the calculus of fantasy, scrubbed
clean of impossibility and polished with
inspiration and unbridled ingenuity.
Envision a future and it is yours.

Posted in Poetry | Leave a comment

Venezuelans and Their Food

Earlier today, an article on the National Public Radio website about a food common in Venezuela, called arepas, launched my exploration of the dish. Several recipes later, my interest grew beyond food as I became increasingly intrigued about the current state of affairs in the deeply divided country. I tried to find reliable, unbiased information about the recent plebiscite and the Maduro government’s response to it. Regardless where I looked, I questioned the legitimacy or the veracity of the news. from BBC to NPR to a couple of English language “news” websites dedicated to Venezuelan politics, nothing was sufficiently comprehensive, nor sufficiently absent judgmental language, for me to feel I was learning what’s really going on in the country.

Much of what the major international news organizations write about the country seems to be fed to them by the governments of the countries within which they operate. BBC reports on what the British government says. NPR (one of the news outlets I’ve come to trust almost completely) reports on what the U.S. government says. I have absolutely no confidence in a word that comes from the present U.S. administration; it is steeped in blatant lies. And when I read Venezuelan media, the claims that effectively say “we report only facts and do not allow bias to enter our reporting” are immediately crushed by blatantly biased reporting, both pro-Maduro and anti-Maduro. Despite my inability to find news I can trust (or my inability to trust news I can find), I think the days of Nicholás Maduro as President of Venezuela are numbered. Of course, I’ve thought the days of Donald Trump’s presidency were numbered in the low single digits since his inauguration and I was wrong about that.

The upshot of all this is that I wish I knew more about Venezuela and its immediate future. And I wish I had more confidence in the news media. I am not about to start calling every media outlet “fake news,” but I think many media outlets are allowing themselves to be manipulated into becoming just that. Part of the reason can be traced to people like me, people who choose to get their news “free” online, as opposed to paying the very reasonable (and very expensive) prices of newspapers. And, for that matter, television news. We ask advertisers to pay for news; we feel they should pay for our access to information.

This little side-show has gone in an altogether different direction that I envisioned when I started. I’d really like to find a source for the pre-cooked white corn flour necessary to make arepas. I suspect that won’t be hard. And I’d like to assemble a collection of recipes for several fillings I can use for arepas. I suspect that, too, won’t be hard. And I wish I could share some of the arepas I make with the hungry people of Venezuela. Because I think they are in far greater need of arepas than I.

Posted in Compassion, Food, Justice, Politics | Leave a comment

An Artificial Benchmark

This is post number 2400. And ninety-one more await as drafts, though most of them will eventually be erased without ever realizing the potential of being seen by human eyes other than my own. If each of my published posts embodied a day of my life, this blog would represent more than six and one-half years of my existence, more than ten percent of my time on earth thus far. That’s either a sad critique on the impact I’ve had on the universe or a commentary about my ability to talk to myself at length. In reality, I’ve been writing this blog for just shy of five years,  having written my first post here on August 10, 2012. In that first post, buried among the introductory garble, I said this:

This site was conceived as a place for me to record my confusion, thoughts, beliefs, frustrations, wishes, dreams, desires, and what little wisdom I have had the good fortune to acquire through the years. Reflecting back on my life, I have many regrets, almost all based on my failure to be the kind of person I know I want to and should be.

It has turned into a place where I do all the above, as well as labor over writing fiction that simulates my confusion, thoughts, beliefs, frustrations, wishes, dreams, desires, and a modicum of wisdom. The characters about whom I write, the ones whose inexcusable flaws exist in parallel with short-lived outbursts of decency, are modeled in one way or another after the person I know better than anyone: me. Perhaps that’s why I’ve been unable to finish—satisfactorily—writing about any of them. Neither their worst flaws nor best attributes, after the flaws have been sanded and polished, have a finished model in life.  It’s quite possible that the characters in my writing would have scant appeal to most readers, given their flaws.

I continue the slow process of attempting to compile a collection of what I’ve written, both here on the blog and in other places, into a collection with some semblance of order and connectedness. I’m finding chaos in what I’ve written, with occasional pockets of smoother, less disturbing environments. I suppose all human lives are chaotic disturbances into which sufficient serenity is introduced to make them bearable. So, in that sense, my writing is like life. And therein rests the eternal question: what is the meaning of life (and, by extension, my writing)? None of my diatribes answer that question, not even the ones that assert, “there is no meaning to life, life just is.”

Why these matters are on my mind today, not on the anniversary of the blog but, instead, at the achievement of a meaningless number of posts, I do not know. I did not stop to ask before I wrote what I’ve written. And now it’s too late. I’d have to go back and start over, and that’s not on my agenda this morning. This morning, my agenda calls for delivering my wife’s car to the dealer for its 30,000 mile service, which will drain our bank account to the tune of well over $300. Perhaps I’ll write about greed in the automotive sales and service industry in a future post.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Distant Broden

Lina waited for Broden to continue.

“Oh, he was just so totally in love with life. Why would a man buy a two million dollar car and then kill himself a week later? I mean, it just doesn’t make sense.”

“That puzzles me, as well,” Lina said. “But I was part of the forensics team that looked into the car. We found nothing mechanically wrong with the car.”

A vein rose on Broden’s forehad as she spoke. “I don’t doubt you found nothing wrong with the car. But how can that lead to a pronouncement that the cause of death was suicide?”

“I can’t answer that. I was not the one who made that determination. Tell me, does the pronouncement that your husband’s death was a suicide have any effect on your insurance settlement? I assume he had a life insurance policy.”

Broden’s eyes bore into Lina as she responded. “I can’t answer that. I haven’t even thought about life insurance. Fortunately for us—for me—money has not been an issue. If you’d like to check, though, feel free.  I imagine you already have. We both have policies issued by Länsförsäkringar. I don’t recall the amounts, but I doubt they were significant, at least not compared to our net worth.”

Lina had checked into insurance before the investigation had concluded. There was nothing to suggest murder for insurance money. But she had run out of ideas. She was, to use one of Eklund’s favorite sayings, “poking the bear.”

Weaving, again. Just weaving. I hope to open my blog one day to find a tapestry.

Okay, but now I have to explore that statement. What am I waiting for? What magical potion will string together for me all these disjointed snippets, vignettes that struggle to find relevance on their own? I’m not happy with myself tonight. I’m disappointed that I’ve not published anything, I’ve not even finished anything worth publishing, and I’ve allowed Donald Trump to keep breathing. Not that I have any control over that last item, though if I were a praying man I’d pray I did. I need to either find someone to guide my prolific, stream-of-consciousness writing or give it up and devote my attention to learning how to do body work on my newly-reacquired 1997 Ford Ranger XLT Extended Cab. I’m probably better suited to the truck. I can buy a new headliner for $260 plus shipping, install it, and feel like I’ve accomplished something. Or I can write snippets unrelated to anything else I’ve written, give myself a passing grade for literary accomplishment, and wish, unsuccessfully, I would accomplish something. The truck wins. It’s more expensive, but what’s money for except to spend?

Posted in Fiction, Writing | Leave a comment

Ophira

“If you look long enough and hard enough, you can find things to dislike about almost anyone. But you’d be looking for the wrong things. Instead, you ought to be looking for those shreds of likability hidden among the overgrowth of noxious weeds.”

That’s what Ophira Strunk said to me before she boarded a small freighter in Baltimore Harbor, bound for Norway. Ophira had an unhealthy attraction to Norway. At least that’s what I thought at the time. In fact, her attraction was not to Norway but to Stefan Ruud, a married man who had just left his wife, Elise, and son, Kennet. I learned later that Stefan, an oceanographer by training and a writer-philosopher by avocation, did not really expect Ophira to come to him. But he wished she would. He wished so hard she would that he took the extraordinary risk of leaving his family in anticipation of Ophira’s arrival. I, of course, felt deeply wounded when Ophira told me later she had left me for a married man she’d never actually talked to before she disembarked from the freighter in Stavanger. Later, though, when I learned more about what drove the two of them away from their respective spouses and toward one another, I was touched that they took risks the rest of us would never dream of taking.

Ophira was not my wife. Not formally or officially. We’d lived together as if we were married since 1975, though, so perhaps the state would recognize us as having a common-law relationship. When she told me she wanted to travel, alone, to Norway on a freighter, I tried to dissuade her from such an odd undertaking. She would have none of it, though. She was determined that she would take the trip, as she told me, “to explore parts of me I did not even know where there until just recently.”

Weaving. That’s what I may be doing. I may be weaving strips of story, thread by thread, into a tapestry. Or whole cloth. Or a tangle so utterly chaotic that it will become suitable for nothing but stuffing pillows.

Posted in Fiction, Writing | Leave a comment

Damn the Grills, and All They Stand For!

The intense loathing I feel for the man who sold me my cheap grill is intensifying. It is morphing into abject hatred, coupled with hatred steeped in molten rock and liquid steel so thin that it could be sprayed from a hypodermic needle. I do not know the man’s name. It’s probably better that way, lest I search Saline County property records for him, get his address, and cause him to vaporize in the white-hot heat of my rage.

You may wonder what caused such an outburst? Glad you asked. I just burned the sh** out of my fingers, courtesy of the grill. And the jerk chicken I was grilling was not even close to done. So I had to open the inadequate grill lid (difficult, as a bolt disappeared on the first try), retrieve the chicken from the inadequate grates, try (but fail) to protect my eyebrows and hair from intersecting with the heat of the sun (on the wrong bloody side of the grill), and move the chicken corpses to a cooker suitable for oven cookery.

Tonight, I’m in the mood to capture and force hummingbirds to listen to my complaints, kill chickens that exhibit even the least bit of scorn for my eating habits, skin grill-sellers, vaporize gas grills and their progeny, and set fire to the Milky Way for its willingness to host bad actors.

If my finger didn’t hurt the way it does (thanks to the goddamn grill and its expulsion of a bolt holding the lid on at the most inopportune time), I would go to bed early and sulk. Instead, I’ll drink whiskey and plan an insurrection. Grrrrrr!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A Short Treatise on Reconstructive Transplantation

The first experiments with what was once called “teleportation” involved enormous machinery into which a person’s body was inserted. This occurred long after the whimsical “teleportation” of characters in Star Trek brought the idea into the popular consciousness. Unlike the Star Trek characterization, the real process was much more involved and, in the early days, extremely dangerous. Estimates of the number of unsuccessful teleportations have ranged as high as two hundred thousand. To this day, no one is quite clear on what happened to the physical bodies of those who disappeared, never to appear in their intended relocations.

The term “relocation” is not, and never was, accurate. The proper term, reincarnation, was avoided because of its religious overtones, but that’s precisely what it was. Yet someone, no one knows just who, started using the term “transplant” to describe the process. It caught on, despite summoning chilling visions of organ removal and replacement. Regardless of its history of lost souls and erroneous linguistic identification, the process we now call “reconstructive transplantation” is as common as marriage and automobiles were in times past.

Today, reconstructive transplantation has reached an almost one hundred percent success rate. It is rare, indeed, to learn of a person disappearing during the initiation of the process and failing to reappear at the conclusion. It happens, but in the old days, people died in automobile accidents or wedding violence with greater frequency; the risks are deemed to be within acceptable limits.

Reconstructive transplantation (RT), in its simplest form, involves replicating every aspect of a person, including every single physical, mental, emotional, and experiential attribute. That includes memories (which, as we know, are bio-electrical). The data that record these attributes are transferred, instantaneously, from the reconstructive transplantation initiation equipment (RTIE) to the reconstructive transplantation receptor equipment (RTRE). Simultaneously, the RTIE’s laser essentially erases the individual who has been replicated at the same movement the RTRE replicates (like the old-style 3-D printers, but far faster and more elegant) the subject in his or her new location. As I describe this process, I hope you can see that it’s not a physical movement of the individual from one place to the next, but the actual elimination of the individual in one place and the recreation of the person in another.

One especially pernicious aspect of RT involves the occasional hiccup, in which the RTRE creates more than one copy of the subject. Because they are absolutely identical and their creation occurs simultaneously, there is no way to know which is the “original” and which is the “copy.” The legal system is still sorting out how to handle claims between the “dupes,” as we call them, for the rights to live the lives they both assert are theirs. At present, the admittedly unpleasant method is to allow each dupe a fifty percent share; one dupe lives the normal life for a week while the other is kept in a dupe suppression facility (kept in what amounts to a medically induced coma), and then the two switch places. The obvious problem with that is that the two accumulate vastly different experiences from week to week, making them different from one another. Eventually, the legal system will determine how to handle this. RT specialists have long called for immediate euthanasia in such situations, in which one of the two dupes would be selected at random and put to sleep, thereby eliminating the problem of experiential divergence. The ethicists are still working on that one.

The converse problem occurs when the RTIE eliminates data and the subject but the RTRE fails, for one reason or another, to capture the data. That may well be what happened to the missing two hundred thousand.

Posted in Writing | Leave a comment

Shielded from the Real World

A word of warning: This is macabre and unsettling. Maybe quite advanced on the madness scale. It’s just me, practicing for something yet to be written, I suppose.


“Mrs. Griffin, may I go to the bathroom?”

“No.”

“But I need to go, Mrs. Griffin.”

“Tough. You had your chance fifteen minutes ago. Wait another fifteen minutes.”

“I can’t, Mrs. Griffin. I need to go bad.”

“Did you need to go fifteen minutes ago?”

“Yes ma’am, but not so bad.”

“Well, then, you’ll just have to wait. And next time, don’t put it off.”

“But Mrs. Griffin, I’m afraid I’ll soil my pants.”

“You better not. If you do, I will tan your hide. Is that clear?”

Tears suddenly flooded the boy’s face as Tanksley Trevemore began to cry, his sobs deep and effusive. A sickening stench flooded the air. The rear of the boy’s khaki trousers darkened from beige to dark brown.

Hope Griffin smelled the mistake and grabbed the wooden paddle hanging from the side of her desk. She marched over to Tanskley, yanked him out of his chair, and bent him over the desk, his face and chest against the desk and his brown butt facing upward.

“Maybe this will teach you a lesson,” she screamed as she slammed the paddle, drilled with dozens of tiny holes, against the brown backside. The instant the wood hit the cloth, brown streams sprayed up from those tiny holes, drenching Hope.

“Goddamn it, Tanksley, you did this on purpose!” The paddle again tore through the air, landing hard on Tanksley’s brown bottom. Another mist of youthful diarrhea engulfed the woman, whose convulsive shrieks caused the other children in the room to wince and turn away.

Cagley Smale, the acting principal, entered the room just before the first paddle hit Tanskley’s behind. He witnessed both the first and the second incidents of hard wood against soft, wet fabric. And he heard Hope’s enraged howls. He had no other choice, he thought, than to put an end to the beating. Raising his 45 calibre pistol in front of him, at eye level, he pulled the trigger. The report was deafening. Little Tanksley’s body went limp.

“Thank you, Mr. Smale! I thought the boy was going to kill me.”

Smale, seeming surprised by the response, tipped his hat at the teacher and spun around toward the door. “It was nothing, ma’am. It was nothing. I’m just sorry I missed.”

He stopped, turned around again, and aimed the pistol at the smiling teacher. The explosive sound of gunfire filled the air as Hope Griffin’s eyes grew wide and she clutched her chest. The bullet entered her chest just below the sternum, missing the heart by only a few inches.

“How could you?” Her words, shallow and weak, barely escaped her mouth.

“It was easy,” Smale replied.

The remaining children in the room looked confused and frightened.  “Children, don’t you fret, that poor boy is no longer suffering the indignities of dealing with Mrs. Griffin. And you won’t have to deal with her anymore, either.” Smale’s toothy smile filled his face with ivory pickets as long as his lips were wide.

The class erupted in spontaneous applause. Karen Clockman, subbing for Eleanor Corely, who Smale had gunned down only a week earlier, peeked in the door. “Is everything all right?”

“Peachy,” Smale replied. “Do you have anything that will remove blood stains from a white shirt?”

Posted in Writing | Leave a comment

Citizenshifting

For reasons beyond my capacity to understand and explain as I begin to write this, I crave fish this morning. I’d like a filet of fresh cod, heavily salted, grilled over some smoky mesquite shavings and drizzled with lemon juice. The fish would pair well with a baked potato dressed with Greek yoghurt mixed with fresh-ground black pepper, horseradish, and a touch of vinegar. Slices of ripe tomato and cucumber spears would almost finish the meal, though I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention the absolute requisite: slices of peaches so ripe they’re nearly over-ripe.

I do not know why, but this menu takes me a hundred years into the future, when I am a middle-aged Canadian man living alone in a small but comfortable home in Vermilion Bay on Eagle Lake in the township of Machin, Kenora District in northwestern Ontario. I suppose that’s the reason the menu is on my mind. See, it didn’t take long for me to understand the genesis of my hunger, did it?

This is a typical breakfast meal for me in my future incarnation. It’s not a common breakfast for other Vermilion Bay residents, mind you. Most of my neighbors enjoy breakfast cereals before heading out to guide visitors from Duluth and Thunder Bay on fishing and hunting expeditions. I, though, relish my fish and potatoes and so forth. When I have visitors, a rarity, I surprise them with my breakfasts. Perhaps that’s why visitors are so rare for me.

I’m as much of an oddity a hundred years hence as I am today. It’s not just my appetite, it’s my attitude. Unlike my very pleasant neighbors, I’m more interested in the evolution of Canadian English than I am in hunting and fishing. I’ve just completed a dictionary of Canadian lingo, defining and recording for posterity, terms like chesterfield and pogey and all-dressed and give’r and parkade and hoser. They’re all terms my neighbors use, but they are unaware they’re uniquely Canadian. Ever since I was a boy, in that other life, I’ve coveted the state of Canadianship. In spite of the growing number of incidents in which Canadians behave like their southern neighbors, Canadian decency still courses through my veins. I’m afraid the coarseness of the Dakotas and Texas and the rest of the fifty U.S. states is flooding northward, though. One day, and it won’t be long, Canada will be just another notch in the belt of swashbuckling indecency and arrogance. That’s when I’ll have to leave, bound for the outskirts of Kvaløyvågen, Norway. I’ve always admired Norwegian decency, too. Would that I would have been born Norwegian. My parents would have lived a far better life than they did as struggling Americans, two hundred years earlier. I might write a book about the benefits of citizenshifting. But, then again, I might not. But I’ll coin the word, by God. I will coin the word and claim it as my own. Citizenshift. Citizenshifting. I am a Citizenshifter. That’s not to be confused with being Citizenshiftless, which is not to be coveted in any sense of the word.

Posted in Uncategorized, Writing | 1 Comment

Time in Motion

I woke up tomorrow, refreshed. And I will wake up yesterday, equally as spent as the day after tomorrow.

Time is cylindrical most days, spherical in others. Its texture mimics the odor of bravery or the taste of sullen defeat. We treat time as if it were invisible, like the concept some call God, but its shape and size and countenance are as clear to us as that decaying face in the mirror, if only we allow ourselves to see it. We encase the passage of time in photographs, capturing babies growing into homeless alcoholics and greed-drenched politicians. We nurture it as we mold idealists into administrators—whose sole purpose is to bring mindless order to circumstances in which the potential beauty of chaos is ripe and ready. Time twists us into stone pretzels, deformed fossils of unrealized dreams and broken promises unwilling to bend or yield to concepts outside our parochial experience. Time is an allegory for pain, an illusion of meaning, when meaning never existed. Clothed in robes of memory and draped in hollow wishes, we claw our way from the womb to the mortuary, seeking satisfaction in a world in which there is no reason to be satisfied. The only satisfaction is time gone by, that worn and weary remnant of struggles and mistakes and those temporary victories swept away by losses too enormous to comprehend.

Sadness, as deep as the vault within which the Milky Way was buried at the end of its pointless reign, will wash around the remnants of time, flushing the rubble of existence into the drain from which nothing can emerge. Black holes are harbingers of time expunged. When the gravity of our mistakes and our dangerous folly tilt the scale of celestial justice, black holes and their hidden progeny will swallow time and its accouterments. Even dreams cannot break the bonds of the end of time.

Posted in Writing | Leave a comment

Skeptic

When people you value ignore things important to you, you begin to wonder how important you are to the people you think matter. You start to withdraw into your shell and you question the depth of others’ investment in your happiness, just as you begin to question the merit of your investment in theirs. When it reaches that point, you reach for the switch and you turn it off. As nakedly self-serving as it sounds, you cannot afford to invest your emotions in people who don’t reciprocate. Happiness is not a commodity readily available on the open market. It is a rare thing, requiring nurture and tenderness. You may think a quid pro quo is an ugly, commercial element unsuited to friendship. You may think it, but you’d be naive. We all want to be the personification of altruism, but we’re not suited to the task.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Famine is to Family as Murder is to Mother

Allen Sherman loved his mother. Her maiden name was Achtung. She was of Prussian ancestry, though she was loathe to admit it. She preferred to tell lies, claiming Scottish lineage on her mother’s side, with a direct line to nobility that predated the Viking invasions. No one believed her, of course, not even Allen Sherman. But he never confronted  Jameestaqueezia Sherman with his doubts about her heritage because there was no reason to do so. Not until rumors of a new cleansing started to circulate. But by then, Jameestaqueezia had manufactured enough fake genealogical evidence of her ancestry to make its denial highly suspect.

Allen tried to persuade her to stop the charade, even before the authorities began their inquiries. “Mother, something’s afoot. I’m afraid this anti-Scottish sentiment is getting out of hand. I’m concerned your assertions about your Scottish ancestry will get you in trouble.”

“Assertions? They’re not assertions. They’re statements of fact! And, anyway, this anti-Scottish nonsense will pass quickly. These things always do.”

“Not always, Mother. Look at what happened to the Argentinians. They rounded them up and put them in camps and deported them. It was just like World War II and the Japanese. Except it was worse. There’s not a soul of Argentinian ancestry in this entire country now.”

“Well, that was different. Scottish ancestry is not like Argentinian ancestry. With the likes of Perón and Videla in that country, it’s a wonder they didn’t deport them all much earlier.”

“Mother, that is such a bigoted attitude! And I’m serious about talking about your Scottish ancestry. If you keep up with your proclamations about how proud you are to have pre-Viking Scottish ancestors, they’re going to show up at the door one day and cart you off!”

Jameestaqueezia Sherman, nee Achtung, was having none of Allen’s fear-mongering. She continued to proudly announce her noble lineage to anyone who would listen. But two weeks after Allen’s entreaty, she responded to a knock at the door.

A tall uniformed man, his face dull and emotionless, stood at the door. “Are you Jameestaqueezia Sherman?”

“I am. Who wants to know?”

“I am Captain Enrique Squalor with the U.S. Genealogical Cleansing Service. I’m here to escort you to the deportation barge.”

“What? What do you mean?”

“We have evidence that you are of Scottish ancestry and, furthermore, that you have expressed pride in your scurrilous connection to that land whose only claim to fame is the Highland Potato Famine of the middle nineteenth century. You’re being taken to the Scottish deportation barge, which will be escorted to the middle of the Atlantic Ocean and released.”

“There must be a mistake. My maiden name is Achtung. Actually, I am of Prussian stock.”

“That’s not what you’ve been telling your neighbors, Mrs. Sherman. And that’s not what the documents you’ve filed with the Orleans Parish Genealogical Authority say. Come with me.”

The Scottish deportation barge was a large, flat, open-air vessel with no railings. Sixty-four hundred eye-hooks, thick and  eighteen inches apart, were affixed to the deck. Jameestaqueezia and sixty-three hundred and ninety-nine other Scottish deportees, rounded up from as far away as Port Arthur, Texas and Springfield, Missouri, were chained to the eye-hooks. When the barge was fully loaded with its human cargo, an enormous tugboat pushed it away from dockside and steered it down the Mississippi River into the Gulf of Mexico. Once in the open Gulf, the tug pulled around the front of the barge. Captain Enrique Squalor, aided by his newly-hired Lieutenant, Allen Sherman, attached thick cables to the barge. When the cables were firmly affixed, the Captain steered the monstrous tug southeast.

As the pair of vessels slipped around the southern coast of Florida a day and a half later, the coastline was visible in the distance. It was the last time the deportees would see land. Four days later, drenched with salt water and burned by the sun, the deportees watched Captain Squalor and his Lieutenant disconnect the cables.

“You’re just going to leave us out here?!” Jameestaqueezia, shouting at her son, shook her fist in his direction.

Allen Sherman stared at her and nodded.

“It takes guts, boy, to do your duty when it’s family.” Captain Squalor put his hand on Allen’s shoulder.

“If only she’d have stopped the charade of Scottish ancestry long ago, Captain, this whole thing could have been avoided.”

“Yeah, son, this could have been a much brighter day. But she made her bed. The lot of them did.”

Ten years later, almost to the day, both the Argentinian and the Scottish deportations were ruled unconstitutional. And a year after that, Captain Enrique Squalor and Lieutenant Allen Sherman were hanged after being convicted of sixty-four hundred counts of the crime of mass murder by neglect. The U.S. Attorney General had opted not to pursue charges against them for their subsequent involvement in the Peruvian and French deportations.

Posted in Fiction, Writing | Leave a comment

More World of Wine

Tonight was the fifth (I think…France, Italy, Portugal, Germany, Australia…were there more?) “World of Wine” dinner and wine tasting we’ve attended at Coronado Center. Tonight’s meal and wine assortment were Australian. Upon entering, we were given a glass of Andove Zibibbo Sparkling Moscato. If I never drink the wine again it will be too soon; far too sweet and syrupy for my taste. The meal began with a truly tasty Australian meat pie, which was paired with a 19 Crimes Red blend. The wine was pretty good. Next up, the second meal course was Australian “Rack of Lamb” chop (Lollipop Chop) with red wine sauce. I think it was to have been paired with with Greg Normal Cabernet/Merlot, but the wine was delivered early. The lamb was good, though it’s hard to keep such a dish warm with banquet service. The wine was pretty good, as well, but very tannic (which I like). Next up was Sticky Toffee Date Pudding, paired with Jacobs Creek Dry Reisling; I liked both, though Janine was not fond of the wine. I bought a bottle of the wine, only $9 with tax. The final course was a cheese and fruit plate, paired with D’Arenberg Stump Jump Chardonnay.

We ended up taking home another bottle of wine, in addition to the dry reisling, thanks to my commitment to the venue manager to sponsor him in the upcoming BikeMS ride from Little Rock to Hot Springs Village and back. The wine that came as part of that commitment is one he made; it should age until at least December (and not much longer). He enjoys making wine and was the driving force behind the wine-making class we attended (and in which he participated as a teacher) a month or two (or three) ago.

The next two World of Wine events will feature Argentina (in September) and Chile (in October). Unless our plans change, we’ll attend those events, too. I really can’t say either the wine or the food is particularly appealing, but the events are interesting. It’s hard to say just why I enjoy them; perhaps it’s the company and the entertainment value of the environment.  And maybe it’s because I enjoy seeing the efforts of a creative guy turn in to something that engenders support from throughout the Village. I’m glad we attend. It’s an enjoyable evening.

To top it off, our table-mates offers suggestions of good, cheap wines: Crane Lake and Foxbrook wines, said to be alternatively-branded “Two Buck Chuck” wines and “Big Smooth,” said to be cheap and quite appealing. We suggested Slate Dry Reisling, a South African wine, to another table-mate who’s into reislings.

And there you have it.

 

Posted in Food, Wine | Leave a comment

In Favor of Cheese

We have the very good fortune to have some very generous neighbors. A woman with whom Janine plays cards one night a week most weeks gave us three cheeses earlier this week. Because I want to remember them for future reference (if I can find them—these were sent to her by distant progeny), I am writing about them here.

Abondance: A semi-hard raw milk cheese made in France. It is aged for a minimum of ninety days on specially produced spruce boards. According to cheese.com: “It has a strong smell and an intensely fruity, buttery and hazelnut flavour, with balance of acidity and sweetness, followed by a lingering aftertaste. Unearth an aroma of nutty vegetation as you slice the cheese. However, remember the crust including the gray layer beneath, should be removed before eating.”  Though I agree with the description, I did not remove the crust; I like the crust as much as the cheese.

Cabra la Prudenciana: This Spanish cheese is a stronger, more powerful cheese than the Abondance, but I like it as much. Janine is not as fond of it as I; this is good, as I get to eat the rest of it. According to Zuercher Cheese on Tumblr, “Cabra La Prudenciana has a compact paste with tiny eye formation. Although slightly granular at first, it warms up nicely on the palate. Unexpectedly buttery for a goat’s milk cheese, Cabra La Prudenciana reminds one of its sheepy cousins. We are especially delighted that this cheese remains unpasteurized. The flavor begins with a fresh, tangy, salty bite, then lingers and mellows into a goaty, herbal finish.”


 
Shepherd’s Blend: This cheese, from Carr Valley Cheese Company in Wisconsin, is a sheep, goat and cow milk cheese cured for 10 weeks, so says the Carr Valley Cheese website. They go on to say “it has a soft body and a subtle, complex flavor. Excellent melting cheese and great in any recipe!”

I had samples of each this afternoon, along with a few large green olives stuffed with garlic and jalapeño. It was the appropriate snack for the day, for me, and for this century. It just worked.

Posted in Food | 1 Comment

In Twenty-Five Years, Give or Take a Year, I’ll Be Canadian

Twenty-five years ago, I had no assurances I would live to reach sixty-three years of age. Nor did I have such assurances five years ago or even one year ago. The absence of assurances notwithstanding, I had expectations. And they’ve been met, albeit with some adjustments and difficulties. I have no assurances I’ll reach sixty-four, though if I’m alive come the end of October, that expectation will have been met.

A lot can change in twenty-five years.  George H.W. Bush was President in 1992. Bill Clinton was running for the job. In the years since, Clinton won the election and then repeated his victory. And he was impeached, thanks to his dalliance with Monica Lewinsky and lying about it. George W. Bush stumbled into office, twice, and then Barrack Obama twice won the office. The twin towers fell to terrorism. Princess Diana died in a car crash in Paris. O.J. Simpson was found not guilty of murdering Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman, then was found guilty of, among other things, armed robbery. Terry Nichols bombed the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City and paid for his crime with his life. North Korea tested its first nuclear device. NASA revealed evidence of water on Mars. The American Episcopal Church became the first church to approve a rite for blessing gay marriages. One hundred ninety-five nations signed the Paris Agreement on climate change. I took a short sabbatical that turned into a longer sabbatical that turned into retirement. The last original “Peanuts” cartoon appeared in newspapers after the death of the creator, Charles Schultz. China ended its one-child policy. The Columbine high school massacre took place. The first smartphone was sold. Saturn Corporation sold its last car and went out of business. Oldsmobile went out of business. Corporations, granted personhood by the Supreme Court, stole elections.

Now, I consider whether, twenty-five years hence, I will be in a position to write about my lack of assurances and my expectations. In twenty-five years, I would be approaching my eighty-ninth birthday. Considering that my father died at eighty-one and my mother died at seventy-eight, the odds are not in my favor. But if I were to be alive then, in 2042, I would have witnessed the discovery of intelligent life on multiple planets in nearby galaxies. I would have seen the creation of new forms of collectivism, in which large groups of people opt out of society as we know it today in favor of self-rule without the encumbrances of structured society. Cars would have long-since been abandoned in favor of transportation cyborgs, hybrids between horses and gyroscopes with comfortable seating. Chiggers would have been eradicated, replaced in the insect food chain by harmless creatures whose only desire and only purpose is to be food. Euthanasia, adopted worldwide as the only means of human death following the advent of drugs that induce self-healing of all injuries and ailments, would be mandatory. Crime would have been eliminated by making almost all behaviors legal; without the prohibitions on behaviors we deem criminal today, the incentive to break the rules would have disappeared, thereby reducing such behaviors to negligible levels. Cutting in line in grocery stores would be the only criminal act, punishable by permanent paralysis and periodic public floggings. Certain sea creatures—including dolphins, starfish, and shrimp—would have evolved to the extent that they live on land.

A few years short of 2042, on my eighty-sixth birthday, I will share a bottle of New Zealand wine with two dolphins and a shrimp; this gathering will take place in The Canadian Brewhouse in Timberlea, Alberta (incredibly, it will still be there), a suburb of Fort McMurray. We will, of course, enjoy an order of Montreal smoked meat poutine with our wine. Because bigotry has no expiration date, a burly tourist from the lower forty-eight, a guy named Scud Portman, will shout to my companions, “Hey, get out of here and go back where you came from! I don’t want no seafood where I eat my steak!” With one quick slip of her tail, Swoop Westerman (she’s the female of the dolphin pair) will send Scud Portman to his early demise (he didn’t take the self-healing drug). His corpse will be disposed of with the rest of the refuse from the kitchen and we will continue enjoying our repast. An African eel, watching the engagement from a corner booth, will approach us. “Hello, I’m Slither Cone and I just wanted to say I was impressed with the way you handled that jerk. Can I buy your dinner?” We will decline, of course, but will invite her to join us, which she will. The bartender, a retired lumberjack named Brandon Sawman, will send over another bottle of wine with a note attached; it will say ‘This bottle of wine is on me. Here’s to brotherly love.’ Soon, the entire place will be alive with joyous expressions of decency and kindness, wine and hard liquor serving as the lubricants to said environment. Suddenly, a Royal Canadian Mounty, Dutch Boyle, will run into the place and yell, “There’s a party on the highway! Everyone’s invited!” Naturally, the place will empty quickly as we jump on our transportation cyborgs and head for the highway. A week later, upon returning to  The Canadian Brewhouse, I will be asked to settle the bill that I inadvertently walked the week before. And I will. Because it was never my intent to steal from the owners of such a happy place. Of course, this entire scenario depends on my survival . It sounds like so much fun I feel I have an added incentive to live to see it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Echoes

Another vignette that may find its way into something I write.

Surely you remember those kisses. Those hundreds upon hundreds of kisses. We were shy, at least I was, but we shattered that obstacle somehow. We broke every rule. Yet rules seemed so utterly empty to us, didn’t they? Rules were simply the articulation of fears, fears that human nature, unchecked by onerous boundaries, would explode into chaotic expressions of lust or hatred or love or, perhaps, innocence. We knew the rules but we broke them anyway. We crossed those lines, stepping from strident fidelity into minefields littered with erogenous zones. Your marriage had collapsed. Mine hadn’t begun. It was in that miasma of anger and anticipation that something blossomed, albeit briefly, that brought us together in a fire that burned too bright, too fast. It was so impossibly short that it could not have hoped to satisfy our cravings. And then it was over. Except for the longing and the questions over all these years. “What if?” “What might have happened if fear hadn’t intervened?” And still, today, when I see you, I wonder whether the universe would have spun a little sweeter, a little faster, with a little more energy, if I hadn’t been so immature, so young, and so damned afraid.

Posted in Writing | Leave a comment

The Way to Riches

The switch that controls the left rear burner on our KitchenAid Architect Series II electric range costs $131.69. I know this because I managed to break said switch last night. I carelessly grabbed for a heavy wood cutting board, swinging it at just the right speed and arc of movement so that it hit the knob with sufficient force to snap the end of the switch off inside the knob. After much online effort, I found the part necessary to repair the range. I did not, though, find information about how to remove and replace the broken part. I suppose I’ll just have to monkey with the range, taking it apart bit by bit until I can remove the front panel so I can get behind the switch. Two screws hidden behind the knob suggest it will be easy to remove the switch, but first I must be able to get behind the panel. Alternatively, I could hire someone else to do the exploratory work. But I figure my $131.69 mistake should be enough of an investment, without paying someone $80 an hour to learn the workings of my range.

While searching for the replacement part, I discovered all sorts of other replacement parts for the range. Though I did no calculations, my guess is that I could replace all replaceable parts of the range and the oven below it at a cost of roughly $231,000. That being the case, I think we got an incredibly good deal when we bought this house. Most of the purchase price went toward buying the range. The rest of the house was thrown in for just a few thousand dollars more. So, it occurs to me that, once I’ve repaired the range, I might just sell it at a significantly discounted price—say $130,000—and buy a replacement range for considerably less. Even if I went upscale, I doubt I’d need to spend more than $5,000. So, I’d put $125,000 in my pocket. Considering the selling price of comparable homes in the area, I could then offer the house for sale at a price that would guarantee multiple offers. I’d come out ahead by well over $100,000, which we could use to purchase a smaller home here and another one in a friendlier summer climate.

Now that I know the secret to house prices, I think I’ll start flipping houses nearby. I’ll just break the knobs off their stoves, repair them, sell the ranges at a staggering profit, buy replacements, then sell the houses at steep discounts. In no time, I’ll be awash in money with which to buy seasonal homes worldwide. With the flood of money, I’ll easily be able to buy first class airline tickets to visit my homes in Croatia, Italy, France, Bolivia, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, and other such places. I’ll have ample cash to spend time at my summer homes in Nova Scotia and British Columbia. Once I’ve proven the concept, I’ll offer free, limited-seating seminars in cities worldwide, describing in overview style what I’ve done. For specific details of how the process works, seminar participants can buy sure-fire money-making kits with step-by-step instructions for the low, low price of $5,000 per kit. Hundreds of thousands of people will line up to buy my remarkable kits (cash only, please, no checks or credit cards). After I’ve sold 1,000,000 kits, I’ll retire in luxury. But, because I will not want to be called greedy, I will become a philanthropist, donating 75% of my money toward peace and ending world hunger. Who knew one simple, careless motion with a heavy cutting board could lead to such a fairy tale ending?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Wabi-sabi

Two years ago today, I read an article entitled The Art of the Mistake, by Alice Driver. The article moved me to tears. I doubt others would be moved to tears the way I was. But the ideas offered in the article—ideas that suggested to me the immeasurable value of viewing the world from a peculiar but utterly wonderful perspective—struck a chord so deep within me that I could not help myself. I sobbed. I remember thinking: There must be something wrong with me; this article should not summon such a powerful emotional response. But it did. And, today, as I read the article again for the first time in two years, it had the same effect. As I mull over the strange reaction I have to the article, I am slowly beginning to conclude that the Wabi-sabi world view is a powerful framework upon which emotions may be strung like lights on a Christmas tree.  And that concept is one I need to explore. Not for knowledge, but for enlightenment.

Posted in Philosophy, Wabi sabi | Leave a comment

July 2017 Oklahoma/Kansas Road Trip

July 12, 2017

We left the house around 8:15 a.m., bound first to Hot Springs to visit a friend in the hospital.  When we arrived, she was talking with a surgeon; when we opened the door to her room, he said, “give us a few minutes.” We waited for about fifteen minutes and decided to leave, inasmuch as we were bound for Tulsa and planned to go back roads, which would take us some time. Two hours later, we stopped in Mena, Arkansas to buy some bottled water. We also checked text and voice mail messages, discovering messages from another friend, saying our hospitalized friend won’t need surgery, after all; just stents and medication for now. Good news! We called and spoke to both of them for a bit, before hitting the road again.

By the time we reached Poteau, Oklahoma, we decided we were hungry. But Poteau wasn’t just a hunger-inducer; the place is littered with colorful sculptures of cows. After a little research, we discovered that the cows were the brainchildren of some community leaders who were looking for After stopping at a place we thought was a diner but was, actually, a coffee cafe, we settled on Maria’s Mexican Restaurant. Both before and after lunch, we passed a number of convenience stores that were unfamiliar to us: Tote-a-Poke. And after lunch, near Panama, Oklahoma, we spotted a loose black and white cow on the roadside, enjoying his/her freedom (we only got a glimpse) and fresh grass.

As we neared Tulsa, Oklahoma, the scenery began to look like suburban America. Bixby, Oklahoma could be mistaken for Plano, Texas or Frisco, Texas or any number of other suburbs driven by consumerism, greed, and capitalism gone awry. As we made our way to the motel where we’d made reservations while having lunch in Poteau, I questioned why I’d decided to visit a good-sized city with plenty of traffic jams.

We found out motel, checked in, and quickly learned it has a miserable wifi system. It drives me approximately crazy to be kicked off a very slow internet connection every three to five minutes. Crazy, I say.  After losing my temper any number of times, we headed out to dinner. We ate at Molcajete, a truly wonderful little Mexican spot. We were the only gringos in the place. At one point, the waitress forgot to speak English to us and ask us in Spanish, instead, how we liked out meal. Good food! Good atmosphere! Thanks to the motel clerk for recommending it to us.

After dinner, we went back to the room, where Janine worked crosswords and read the paper, I read the paper and tried to surf the web, and half-watched the film, Con-Air.

When we went to bed, I found I could not go to sleep. By 3:00 a.m., I had been awake for hours. At some stage during pre-daylight hours, I finally slept, but only barely. The motel, a Best Western near the airport, does not deserve your business. It is a dump.

July 13, 2017

When I got up, I showered, shaved, and went down for breakfast. Janine had awakened in the middle of the night while I was still awake and had a hard time going back to sleep. Finally, she did, and she slept late. Once she got up and had breakfast, we talked about what to do during the day. I had planned to visit the Woody Guthrie Museum and the Gilcrease Museum, but the thought of fighting traffic bothered me. So we opted to hit the road: the day’s destination would be Manhattan, Kansas. With Janine as the guide, we wandered the back roads of Oklahoma and Kansas, rarely encountering much traffic. The roads were in good condition, the scenery got increasingly better, and my stress level (though ratcheted up for reasons I won’t go into here) finally declined.

On the way to Manhattan, we stopped to explore Emporia, Kansas for a bit. My primary goal was to visit Radius Brewing Company, but I had to do lunch first. We ate at BobbyD’s Merchant Street BBQ, which was decent but not exceptional. I was stunned and horrified when I learned that did not have any jalapeños available. After lunch, we crossed the street to Radium Brewing, only to find that it did not appear to be a tap room but, instead, a restaurant. I got the impression after peeking inside that one would feel out of place asking for a single beer; so, we left. I will go back one day, perhaps.

It felt good to be traversing rolling green hills beneath the enormity of the sky, a massive collection of high grey, roiling clouds from horizon to horizon and pole to pole. We got to Manhattan around 4:00 p.m. and immediately found our motel. After unloading our gear, we went for a drive, getting acquainted with the area. Before dinner, I wrote an email to the two managers of the TRIGA Mark II nuclear facility on the KSU campus, asking them some questions, the answers to which would be quite helpful as I write my novel. I hope to get a response.

When it was time for dinner, we went to the Little Apple Brewery and restaurant. Food was good, my ale was adequate. But the place seemed like a monument to greed and wishful thinking. We returned to the motel (after a visit to a liquor store near the brew-pub) with a to-go box, which I finished off a bit later. At the liquor store, we bought their remaining for bottles of Babich Sauvignon Blanc for my sister-in-law and a couple of bottles of cheap but drinkable wine for me, for later.  Back at the motel, we lazed and went to bed early, though neither of us slept particularly well.

July 14, 2017

I awoke late, about 6:45 a.m. I took a shower, slipped on some clothes, and went downstairs for a breakfast of sausage, biscuits and gravy, and coffee. When I returned, Janine was up and had showered and was ready for her breakfast. We returned to the dining area, where she ate a healthier breakfast and I added some cherry flavored Greek yogurt to the meal. During breakfast, we decided to stay in Manhattan at the same motel for another night, versus going up the road to another place where we could have earned a $20 travel bonus; just not worth the effort. With that decision, the day became more relaxed almost instantly.

Our first exploration of the day began with a visit to the Manhattan Zoo. Typically, we are not people who seek out zoos, but the idea of a zoo in a community of fewer than 53,000 people was intriguing. So we visited. It is an interesting place. Not a monstrous zoo by any means, the place has greater variety than we would have expected. Tigers, leopards, anteaters, Asian wild peccaries, peacocks, all manner of exotic birds, otters, cheetahs, monkeys, gibbons, and on and on. As one would expect, the place was awash in children, but the screeching, in general, kept to tolerable levels.

From there, we visited the Flint Hills Discovery Center, which offered an extraordinary education in the history of the Flint Hills region, beginning with the VERY beginning millions of years ago and zipping right on up through the present. The first experience inside the very modern building was a “4-D” movie. The film was shown on an extremely wide screen and was augmented by smoke, wind, snow, odors, and an incredible sound system. I was impressed. And I thought it interesting that many of the words used in the narration echoed the words of a post I made the night before, in which I described the enormity of the sky and said “I have decided parts of Kansas are beautiful; parts of the state are emotionally draining, they are so beautiful.”

We decided to have lunch at the Tallgrass Tap Room, the food and beer establishment run by Tallgrass Brewing. I had a burger and a flight of five Tallgrass offerings, plus one other: 1863 Wheat; Eleanor; Carhop; Thunderclap; and Midwest Berry Crunch, and a non-Tallgrass offering, a Dogfish Head 60 Minute IPA. After lunch, we slipped back to the motel for a bit, then headed out to Kansas State University, where we visited the KState Insect Zoo. In addition to an incredibly large collection of live insects (literally dozens of tarantulas of all sorts, plus monstrous beetles, flies, scorpions, etc.), the place has an exquisite exterior garden area, mostly native plants, I think.

The next stop was the Call Hall Dairy Bar, where we both had double scoops of ice cream. A huge group of students—an extraordinarily diverse group, ethnically speaking—was in front of us, making for slow going to get our orders in. No worries, though, as I found them interesting. I suspect they were from a class that had just let out. We sat and ate our ice cream while we learned, by Janine’s reading signs, that we could buy eggs and all manner of meats in the little store, which is run under the auspices of the Animal Sciences and Industry department of the university.

On the way back to the motel, we stopped at Walmart to buy odds and ends we’d been intending to buy, thence to the hotel. I planned to wash clothes in the single guest washer, but it was hogged by a woman who left her load in the machine for well over an hour after it finished; she also left a load in the dryer. I tried and tried to see if the machines were empty, but the evil, lazy woman left her clothes in the washer and in the dryer. I hope she was forced to iron all the clothes in the dryer in order to make them wearable. We ordered pizza for delivery to the motel; just too tired to go out again. After eating a monstrous amount of pizza and putting the remainder in the refrigerator, we talked about what we would do the next day. We reached a decision, as outlined in the following paragraphs.

July 15, 2017

After breakfast, we drove to Abilene, Kansas, where we took a two-hour ride on an excursion train, the Abilene and Smoky Valley line.  The train is powered by an old diesel locomotive, which pulls an enclosed car (with windows that open and close, thankfully), as well as two open-air (but with canvas covers) gondola cars that have picnic style tables for seating.  The train goes from downtown Abilene (across from the Eisenhower Presidential Library) east, through farmland devoted to soy beans, corn, wheat, and the like. We saw mostly corn and soy; the wheat crop had been harvested near the end of June. The train crossed the Smoky Hill River immediately before arriving at its stop in the town of Enterprise. Along the way, we saw enormous irrigation systems alongside the railroad tracks. I’ve seen them in fields as I’ve driven by in a car, but never quite as close as these were to the train. They are far larger than I thought, and I’ve always thought they were quite large. In Enterprise, the stop is at the Hoffman Grist Mill, a huge red barn of a building in which the owners mill grain and make baked goods and related “stuff” available to the tourists on the train. We did not buy any, so I cannot attest to its flavor or quality. We were told the engine would separate from the passenger cars in Enterprise, move along a siding, and reconnect on the other end, so it could pull the cars back to Abilene. Not long after we got to Enterprise, I saw three guys trying to move a switch that would allow the engine to switch tracks; the tried, then stood up with their hands on their hips, staring down at the switch. I concluded something was amiss. Sure enough, there was track damage, so the engine had to push us back to Abilene, rather than pull.  When we got back to Abilene, we crossed the side street on the west side of the depot to have lunch at the Hitching Post restaurant. Afterward, we visited the Eisenhower Presidential Museum and Library, which was considerably more interesting than I had expected, and a much larger and more modern building that I had anticipated it would be. The museum’s films and displays were, in my estimation, easily on par with the Clinton library in Little Rock and considerably more impressive than the George H.W. Bush library in Bryan, Texas.

From Abilene, we drove the short twenty-plus miles to Salina, Kansas. Once we checked in to our motel, we went out looking for the brewery/restaurant I had read about, Blue Skye Brewery and Eats. I asked whether they had flights; the waitress said “no, but we let you have six-ounce glasses of each of four beers for $6.” Hmm, sounds a little like a flight to me, I thought, so I picked four of Blue Skye’s brews: Fire Engine Red; Muglers IPA; Jalapeño Cream Ale; and 6th Street Wheat. Janine broke the doctor’s rules and ordered a house specialty, The Beach, which was a cucumber-jalapeño margarita. All of them were quite good. We opted for an early dinner at Heart of Dixie restaurant, a Cajun place just across the street from the brewery. Eat there if you must; I was unimpressed, but it wasn’t horrible and I wasn’t poisoned. So what if the service was slow and inept?

July 16, 2017

The next morning, Janine allowed that her sore throat, which had been bugging her for two days, was getting worse. She suggested we head for home. So, after the motel’s breakfast, I filled the car with gas and hit the road. We opted to take the fastest way home, unlike our meandering trip thus far (we opted for back roads for much of the way from Hot Springs to Tulsa to Emporia to Manhattan). Once on the road, Janine spied a sign that intrigued her; it promoted a Swedish village in Kansas, a place called Lindsborg. We took a brief detour to drive around the town and discovered that, indeed, the place was awash in things Swedish, like architecture, Dala Horse figures all over town, and signs everywhere saying, “Välkommen to Lindsborg.”  After our short diversion, we hit the road again and took the Kansas Turnpike and various Oklahoma Turnpikes. Somewhere along the way, we stopped at a Dairy Queen (which was one of several physically connected businesses at a turnpike concession. Though I usually avoid fast food like the plague, I was hungry; our burgers turned out to be rather tasty and much better than the chemical swill I’ve had from most fast-food burger joints. Janine had something I think was called a frosty, which was ice cream with chocolate and fudge mixed with semi-soft ice cream. It was in a dish that could be turned upside down without any of the sweet treat spilling. Another store in the turnpike concession, a place that looked like a convenience store from the outside, was called (according to the sign above its entrance) EZ-Go. I told Janine I assumed that must have been the turnpike’s laxative concessionaire. How she could fail to see the humor in that is beyond me.  We intersected with I-40 several miles west of the Arkansas border, then drove to Arkansas Highway 7 and on home. The trip home began around 8:30 p.m. and we got to the house around 5:45 p.m. Because neither of us were in the mood to figure out what to prepare for dinner, we went to Last Chance Lakeside Café, where the woman who finally seated us got into a very loud shouting match with one of the waitstaff. I asked our waiter to see the manager, who was off doing an errand. When he came back, I explained to him what we’d seen and heard and told him I thought he ought to be aware of it. He apologized and thanked us. I wonder if he actually addressed the issue with the parties involved? I don’t know. And so ends my blow-by-blow of our abbreviated trip. The photos below are from the trip, but I’m insufficiently motivated to go to the trouble of labeling them individually.


Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

All Things in Moderation

The purposes of our trip to Oklahoma and Kansas were twofold: 1) take a long-delayed road trip, with the intent of “chilling” a bit; and 2) gather material from and become familiar with Kansas—Manhattan in particular—as a resource for a novel I’m writing in which Manhattan is one of several settings. I did not expect nor plan to explore my prejudices with respect to conservatism, nor did I anticipate I would come to understand (at least part of) the genesis of conservatism and ways in which liberals/progressives might work toward reaching consensus with conservatives.  But I did both. I came face-to-face with my prejudices about conservatives and conservatism and I think I’ve learned how to begin the task of solving social and political problems in bipartisan fashion.

We (I guess I’m using the royal ‘we’) attack the use of pesticides, drilling for oil, corporate farming, planting cash crops instead of food crops, etc., etc. What we fail to understand, I think, is that the people on the receiving end of our criticism perceive our attacks through two lenses: 1) we are attacking them, personally, because of what they do and the way they live; and 2) we offer no suitable alternatives to enable them to live decent lives if they were to sacrifice the livelihoods we so readily condemn. In addition, our non-religious holier-than-thou attitudes are just as ruffling to them as their religious holier-than-thou are ruffling to us. We’re creating the perfect storm for absolute rejection of anything we suggest. Our arrogance is breeding distrust, opposition, and hatred. With our constant barrage of verbal attacks on their intelligence, their decency, and indeed their humanity, why are we surprised that they respond in kind? We have become Pavlovs and they have become the subjects of Pavlovian experiments; we’ve trained conservatives to respond to our every word with venomous responses, regardless of what we’ve said. We’ve trained them to assume that, each time we open our mouths, we are attacking their way of life.

All right, perhaps we’re not the Pavlovs. Perhaps we are the experimental subjects. Maybe we’ve been trained to respond with loathing to every utterance. But does it really matter who is the trainer and who is the trainee? Doesn’t it make sense to shed the automatic biases against every assertion and attempt, instead, to understand a different point of view? I get the impression from both staunch conservatives and resolute liberals that any willingness to even listen to the other side is traitorous. People who fall into either steadfast, unwavering position, in my opinion, admit to their fears that the “other” might be capable—through some magical mental elixir—of brainwashing us to see some semblance of value in the other perspective. And that fear is born of ignorance and intolerance and bigotry. I’m calling both of you out, conservatives and liberals. You’re both guilty of closing your minds so as not to put your precious chauvinism at risk.

Back to my trip and the genesis of my understanding of conservatism. One’s environment plays a central role in one’s attitude about reality and righteousness. If I had grown up on a farm where a good corn or wheat or soybean crop were absolutely requisite to paying my bills, I might be rather protective of the pesticides I had learned were required to produce a good crop. Without them, I probably learned, the crops would not be as productive and could, in fact, fail. If the first inkling I had that pesticides were controversial came from people who said pesticides were causing wildlife to die in alarming numbers and, moreover, the people who use pesticides are personally responsible for the decimation of wildlife and for birth defects, I might get my back up. If, on the heels of those assertions, came accusations that I both knew the consequences of my use of pesticides and ignored them because my motive was unadulterated greed, I might get defensive. If my accusers then claimed I did not care who or what was hurt today or for generations to come by my recklessness, I might get downright angry.

Now, I did not hear these ideas or anything like them on my trip. But as I watched farmers work their fields, I imagined how they must have responded to liberals who attacked their way of life. For most of my life, the approaches I have heard from the left have been confrontational and angry. They assume everyone has heard or read all the information they have heard about pesticides (and the environment in general, militarism, religion, etc., etc., etc.); and anyone who does not share their zeal and enthusiasm for their positions must be willfully stupid, greedy, slow in the head, backward, nasty, monstrous, and deserving of any number of other negative descriptors. I give equal credit to the right, who without giving it a second thought instantly dismiss anything expressed by a liberal as dangerous, treasonous, communistic, and utterly poisonous.

It’s gotten to the point that attempts on either side, liberal or conservative, to engage in reasoned arguments are rebuffed out of hand by the opposition. There’s no room for discussion; both sides have staked their positions; they’ve drawn their lines in the sand and are unwilling to even consider that there’s a shred of truth in the positions taken by their adversaries. I am not writing this to show how I am somehow above this irrationality; I am in the thick of it. All of us who are not actively attempting to reach out to people whose views directly oppose our own are guilty of perpetuating this madness. Leaving aside his positions on anything (if he has any positions that can be nailed down), conservatives’ embrace of Trump is a shining example of where things have gone. Conservatives do not necessarily like Trump, though many say they do. They embrace Trump because he opposes the rest of us, the people who do not embrace conservatism. To use a well-worn phrase, conservatives embrace Trump because “the enemy of mine enemy is my friend.” Liberals do the same thing. We (or at least many of us) cling to every word of liberal mouthpieces like Rachel Maddow, Michael Moore, Bill Maher, et al. For conservatives, when Trump lambastes these same people and all who think like them, he is their friend. And when Maddow and Moore and Maher attack conservative positions, regardless of any irrationality or other annoying characteristics they may bring to the table, they are liberals’ friends.

This is madness. We, the collective we, have manipulated ourselves into positions in which what matters to us is not so much the positions a person takes but the enemies we share. The more common enemies, the closer our bond, regardless of the fact that our positions on specific issues may be diametrically opposed to one another.  While visiting the Eisenhower museum in Abilene, Kansas, I was reminded of many things Eisenhower did, did not do, or stood for that would be rejected by either liberals and conservatives today: the massive Federal spending for the interstate highway system; his negotiated settlement of the Korean war; his failure to get the government out of agriculture; his failure to moderate the Republican Party. Yet his Presidency accomplished something virtually no presidency since has done: he kept the country at peace, albeit a strained peace. Eisenhower, perhaps as well as any other president, worked collaboratively with his supporters and opponents to achieve consensus where it was achievable. His lessons seem to have been lost on both the Republican and the Democratic parties and their adherents. I cannot speak as a conservative to this loss. But as a proud liberal, I am embarrassed that otherwise intelligent people today seem to have lost their ability to see the decency in compromise. Instead, they view compromise as a moral failing; they see consensus-building as abandonment of their core principles. I think that’s true of conservatives, as well; but I can say with some degree of certainty it’s true of many if not most liberals.

I don’t know who started us down the road to condemnatory politics, but if liberals have half a brain they will stop engaging in their Pavlovian reactive rage and will begin to actually listen to their conservative peers. They will try to understand their opponents’ positions and, instead of attacking their premises as nakedly aggressive and uncaring and unprincipled, will try to moderate their own positions in an effort to give conservatives a carrot to moderate theirs.

This has been a socio-political rant.  You may now feel free to go about your lives, provided you attempt to step back from the inflexible positions you (or I) take about all things social and political.

Posted in Essay, Frustration, Government, Philosophy, Politics, Rant | Leave a comment

Whirlygigs

Today’s adventures involved a drive from Manhattan to Abilene, Kansas, a round-trip train ride in open cars, lunch in a diner adjacent to the train tracks, a visit to the Eisenhower museum, homestead, and library, a drive from Abilene to Salina, a visit to a brew-pub (where I sampled four brews), dinner at a Cajun restaurant, and finding four more bottles of my favorite sauvignon blanc (which, unfortunately, will not stay with us but will, instead, find their way to my sister-in-law). Much more could be said about the day and, when the right time comes, will be done.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Depending on Strangers

We’re in for the night and haven’t bothered turning on the television because, well, there’s usually no point. Instead, I’ve been wandering the internet in search of answers to questions I’ve never quite posed, but which have always waited patiently to be asked. One of those questions—one I never knew was there until this evening—is this: if I found myself alone in a place I knew no one, who would I turn to for help if I needed it? One answer, I was surprised to finally respond, would be this: I’d probably try to find out whether the community had a Unitarian Universalist church and, if so, I’d seek out a leader or member. As one who’s always—and I mean always—eschewed church in all its loathsome forms, the very idea that I’d turn to a representative of a church stunned me. What in the name of all that’s holy or not would cause me to seek out a “church-person?” Well, I’ve decided people who attend UU churches are more likely than the average person on the street to be willing to help a stranger in need. At least I think so. I hope so. Maybe I think a UU member/friend would respond more favorably to someone else who claims UU affiliation. Regardless, I think people who attend UU churches would make good first contacts when seeking help. This attitude is quite a stretch; my only exposure to UU people is recent and has been limited to people from one church. But the concepts I hear espoused from the UU on a broader plane suggest to me that giving aid is a core principle that guides people to attend. They do not have to believe in a god, a dogma, a prescribed theology; they just have to believe in the dignity of other people. That, to me, translates into the kind of people I think I might be able to depend on in a pinch.

As I wandered the interwebs tonight, I discovered decent-sized UU congregations in Manhattan, Kansas and even in other small Kansas towns: Salina and Abilene. Then I looked to see whether Arkansas and Louisiana and Texas have appreciable numbers; there are not huge numbers, but enough to make me believe liberalism is alive and may, with some assistance, continue to breathe in even the reddest of red states.

I wonder whether a UU church would allow my wife and me to show up, unannounced, on Sunday, dressed way, way down? I doubt we’ll find out, but we may.

Posted in Religion | Leave a comment

Postprandial Ruminations

The Little Apple Brewing Company was a bit of a disappointment. The food was fine, but the single beer (the Riley’s Red Ale) was just adequate. And the atmosphere was most definitely not the sort I’m used to experiencing in brew pubs; it struck me as a large, purely profit-driven establishment that caters to people who want flash more than they want flavor and familiarity. The establishment is no Third Place; Ray Oldenburg would find none of the attributes of a third place there, nor did I. Perhaps I’ll try again tomorrow at the Tallgrass Tap House. If that’s not it, there’s bound to be a contender for the title on the KSU campus, too. It will just take some digging. The structure and complexity of my novel—the working title of which is First, We Take Manhattan—is maturing. I’ve been concerned that it has not carried the same emotional gravitas nor depth of character development on which I pride myself. The more I learn of Manhattan, Kansas, and the characters themselves, the happier I’m becoming with it. Not necessarily what I’ve written thus far, but what I feel sure will emerge from expanding what I’ve written and augmenting it by incorporating the sense of place I’m developing by wandering through Oklahoma and Kansas. I expect some of the interactions I’ve had in Emporia and Manhattan will find their way into interactions and character expressions in both existing and new chapters. Tomorrow, we will visit the KSU insect zoo. If time permits, I will try to find my way to KSU Rathbone Hall, where I might get lucky and meet the guys I contacted via email.

Posted in Third Place, Travel, Writing | Leave a comment

Whisking Through the Middle

We went to Tulsa. I hated the traffic. We spent the night. We left. We drove through parts of Oklahoma and Kansas. I have decided parts of Kansas are beautiful; parts of the state are emotionally draining, they are so beautiful. Tonight, we sleep in Manhattan. I’m getting a lay of the land for my novel. I have tried to contact two managers of the TRIGA Mark II nuclear facility, in the hope they will answer questions. I may decide not to do to Manhattan in my novel what I have already done; I may revise it. I can’t save it entirely, but it’s got too much going for it to write it off entirely. Tonight, maybe a brewpub is in order. I like university towns.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Road Tripping in the K States and Going Global

The morning is warm and humid. A short walk to the neighbors’ house to one side of us, to pick up their newspaper, resulted in sweaty skin and a shortness of breath indicative of inadequate exercise. I’ve been promising myself that I will return to morning walks, but a corn on my left foot makes that prospect unattractive. At some point, I’ll accept that I really do need to see a podiatrist for relief. Until then, I’ll complain about my foot and buy Dr. Scholl’s corn pads in quantity in a fruitless attempt to relieve the pain by cushioning the corn.

In a short while, I’ll get in my rental car and drive to Texarkana, where I’ll retrieve my pickup truck from the mechanic. The owner of the shop generously offered to have someone pick me up from Texarkana Regional Airport, where I rented the car from Avis. Less than two hours later, I’ll be back home. And then I’ll wash clothes in anticipation of beginning a road trip of unknown duration. We’ve talked about going to Kansas City, Manhattan, Topeka, Tulsa, and various points in other directions. We probably won’t decide where we’re heading until we get in the car. I like that. We used to do that with some frequency; it felt like freedom.

It occurred to me, as I was writing this, that some of the states to which we are going and the state from which we will depart include the letter K in their names (Arkansas, Kansas, and Oklahoma). Unless I missed something in my cursory review, only four states’ names include the letter. So, on this trip, we expect to drive within the borders of seventy-five percent of the states whose names include the letter K. The only other K state, Kentucky, is not on our itinerary. That triviality provides fodder for my rambling this morning.

Yesterday, we talked about flying to Mexico in the not-too-distant-future to visit my brother and his wife. If we plan far enough ahead and don’t wait too long, we have sufficient air miles to cover our tickets. Otherwise, the cost of the trip would be prohibitive. For the purposes of this stream-of-consciousness-ramble, I’ll consider that Mexico has the K sound. Phonetically, I say the English pronunciation is meksiko. If I were to use the presence of a K sound in country names as a requisite for visiting other countries, I wonder where I’d go? Let’s see:

  • Burkina Faso;
  • Cambodia
  • Cameroon
  • Canada
  • Cabo Verde
  • Central African Republic
  • Chad
  • Chile
  • China
  • Colombia
  • Comoros
  • Costa Rica
  • Cote d’Ivoire
  • Croatia
  • Cuba
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo,
  • Iraq;
  • Kazakhstan
  • Kenya
  • Kiribati
  • Kosovo
  • Kuwait
  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Liechtenstein;
  • Micronesia;
  • Mozambique;
  • Nicaragua;
  • North Korea;
  • South Korea;
  • Pakistan; Qatar;
  • Republic of the Congo;
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis;
  • Slovakia;
  • South Africa;
  • Sri Lanka;
  • Tajikistan;
  • Turkey;
  • Turkmenistan;
  • Ukraine; and
  • Uzbekistan.

Did I miss any?

 

Posted in Travel | Leave a comment